Package nagstamon seems unmaintained / non-responsive maintainer

2019-07-24 Thread Raphael Groner
Hi, does anyone know how to reach out for the maintainer of nagstamon? There's a FTBFS bug [1] since ages without any response so far. It would be bad to see this useful package go away from Fedora. Regards, Raphael [25.07.19 07:23] whoowns nagstamon [25.07.19 07:23] owner: jaur; admin:

Intent to drop python2-kobo*

2019-07-24 Thread rohanpm
I plan to drop the following python2 subpackages from rawhide: python2-kobo python2-kobo-client python2-kobo-worker python2-kobo-rpmlib python2-kobo-rpmlib already fails to install in rawhide due to the removal of python2-koji (bug 1732080). One package depends on these:

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Simply reclaim disk space in Anaconda

2019-07-24 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:01 PM John Reiser wrote: > > Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > ... If the change is approved, I'll suggest Docs team revise > > documentation to recommend any resize of the pre-installed OS (macOS > > or Windows) be done within those operating systems using their tools. > >

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-07-25 16:00 UTC)

2019-07-24 Thread James Antill
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2019-07-25 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2019-07-25 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2019-07-25

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2019-07-24 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 35 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-12f1eb1b1f tomcat-7.0.94-1.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing dehydrated-0.6.5-1.el6 Details about builds:

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-07-25 - 95% PASS

2019-07-24 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/07/25/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190724gitc778255.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Simply reclaim disk space in Anaconda

2019-07-24 Thread John Reiser
Chris Murphy wrote: ... If the change is approved, I'll suggest Docs team revise documentation to recommend any resize of the pre-installed OS (macOS or Windows) be done within those operating systems using their tools. Right now, there's no support for resizing any macOS file system layout

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 24. 07. 19 17:30, Robbie Harwood wrote: Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in a new koji tag (which will be the default target for Rawhide). The package will be picked up from this koji tag, signed and moved onto a second tag.

Re: are the ppc64le builders healthy?

2019-07-24 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "TS" == Tom Stellard writes: TS> Are these updated builders only used for f30? It appears that there are 29 PPC64le builders configured currently: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/hosts?start=80=enabled=name They don't all have the same "capacity" rating. TS> Because I'm still

Re: are the ppc64le builders healthy?

2019-07-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 7/24/19 3:53 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 07/23/2019 11:36 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> "KK" == Kaleb Keithley writes: >> >> KK> I built the latest ceph-14 (14.2.2) on rawhide successfully two days >> KK> ago. Two different builds on f30 built or are building fine on >> KK> x86_64,

Re: are the ppc64le builders healthy?

2019-07-24 Thread Tom Stellard
On 07/23/2019 11:36 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "KK" == Kaleb Keithley writes: > > KK> I built the latest ceph-14 (14.2.2) on rawhide successfully two days > KK> ago. Two different builds on f30 built or are building fine on > KK> x86_64, i686, and aarch64, but failed with different

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: dridi

2019-07-24 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 24. 07. 19 18:51, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: Greetings fellow package maintainers, I'm starting the non-responsive maintainer process on myself because the time I can dedicate to Fedora will significantly drop for the next 3 months. It wasn't that much to begin with... I don't think I will be

[389-devel] please review: PR 50514 - Port UI to Patternfly 4

2019-07-24 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50514 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Simply reclaim disk space in Anaconda

2019-07-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 14:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 15:29 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > Kamil Paral píše v St 24. 07. 2019 v 13:37 +0200: > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:44 PM Ben Cotton > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Simply reclaim disk space in Anaconda

2019-07-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 15:29 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > Kamil Paral píše v St 24. 07. 2019 v 13:37 +0200: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:44 PM Ben Cotton > > wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Anaconda_Reclaim_Disk_Space > > > > > > The Manual Partitioning screen supports all

HEADS UP: Source File Verification

2019-07-24 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Hello, we've got new section in Packaging Guidelines about verifying upstream sources[0] with GPG. Please use it whenever possible :) Thanks! [0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification ___ devel mailing

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: AArch64 Xfce Desktop image

2019-07-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 15:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:32:29PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > In general there's usecases where a low resource desktop is useful, > > such on devices with only 1Gb of RAM where Workstation doesn't provide > > a good experience. > >

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:05:50PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > I've added an entry in the FAQ for this: > https://pagure.io/cpe/rawhide-gating-docs/pull-request/5 > Maybe we could also expend fedpkg to provide some information on this. Speaking with my occasional-packager hat on, yes

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Boost 1.70 upgrade

2019-07-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:48:01AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F31Boost170 > > == Summary == > > This change brings Boost 1.70 to Fedora. This will mean Fedora ships > > with a recent upstream Boost release. > This change, previously approved by FESCo, has

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: AArch64 Xfce Desktop image

2019-07-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:32:29PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > In general there's usecases where a low resource desktop is useful, > such on devices with only 1Gb of RAM where Workstation doesn't provide > a good experience. I definitely agree that there's value in providing for such usecases,

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:31:50PM -, Robbie Harwood wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:30:45AM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > > > > So we don't have an easy way to do this. I have a script that monitors the > > entire pipeline/workflow in production and in staging. > > I have been

Re: [Heads up] Fedora Container base image is getting smaller

2019-07-24 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le mercredi 24 juillet 2019 à 20:05 +0200, Clement Verna a écrit : > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 16:58, Matthew Miller < > mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:09:24AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > > Last couple days a bigger change [2] have been introduced in the > > >

Re: [RFC] target font model on Freedesktop systems

2019-07-24 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le mercredi 24 juillet 2019 à 14:37 +0200, Kevin Kofler a écrit : Hi, Kevin Thank you for taking the time to answer, > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > 2. fontconfig strives to hide all the legacy ways to designate > > different > > parts of this ideal font, and strives to expose a single "font" > >

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Robbie Harwood
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:30:45AM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > > So we don't have an easy way to do this. I have a script that monitors the > entire pipeline/workflow in production and in staging. > I have been querying datagrepper for messages about the build that I've made > to > see

Re: [Heads up] Fedora Container base image is getting smaller

2019-07-24 Thread Clement Verna
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 16:58, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:09:24AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > Last couple days a bigger change [2] have been introduced in the > > fedora:rawhide image. This change drops all the weak dependencies from > > the base image which allowed

Re: Orphaning/retiring 3 Java packages

2019-07-24 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 23.07.2019 um 16:08 schrieb Mikolaj Izdebski : > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:50 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 23. 07. 19 13:27, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >>> Soon after Fedora 31 branching I intend to retire java-packaging-howto >>> package and orphan byaccj and javapackages-tools packages.

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Simply reclaim disk space in Anaconda

2019-07-24 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:38 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:44 PM Ben Cotton wrote: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Anaconda_Reclaim_Disk_Space >> >> The Manual Partitioning screen supports all actions of the Resize Disk >> Space dialog, so it doesn't make sense

Re: MPFR 4

2019-07-24 Thread Pavel Cahyna
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:31:02AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:07 AM Jerry James wrote: > > I'm down to these 3 still to go: arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs, avr-gcc, and > > cross-gcc. Those gcc builds take a long time. :-) So far the builds > > have gone smoothly. > > All the

Re: Self Introduction: Dee'Kej (looking for sponsor)

2019-07-24 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:52 PM Pavel Valena wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "David Kašpar" > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 5:23:22 PM > > Subject: Self Introduction: Dee'Kej (looking for sponsor) > > > > Hello, > > > > my name is David

Non-responsive maintainer: dridi

2019-07-24 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
Greetings fellow package maintainers, I'm starting the non-responsive maintainer process on myself because the time I can dedicate to Fedora will significantly drop for the next 3 months. It wasn't that much to begin with... I don't think I will be able to follow up on anything, especially

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

2019-07-24 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "FW" == Florian Weimer writes: FW> ELF multilib DSOs inside RPMs result in code deduplication, FW> affecting container image size. I think it's important to quantify this kind of thing. I think we can all agree that there is very little benefit to duplicating every single library, so

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:30:45AM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: > > > When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in > > a new koji tag (which will be the default target for Rawhide). The > > package will be picked up from this koji tag, signed

Re: Self Introduction: Dee'Kej (looking for sponsor)

2019-07-24 Thread Pavel Valena
- Original Message - > From: "David Kašpar" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 5:23:22 PM > Subject: Self Introduction: Dee'Kej (looking for sponsor) > > Hello, > > my name is David Kaspar (a.k.a. Dee'Kej), and I used to be a package > maintainer as a

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Robbie Harwood
Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: > When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in > a new koji tag (which will be the default target for Rawhide). The > package will be picked up from this koji tag, signed and moved onto a > second tag. Bodhi will be notified by koji once this

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 11:09, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:36:35PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 24. 07. 19 14:32, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > > > That said,

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:42:11PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 23. 07. 19 22:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > How do I enroll? > > Great! We’re glad to see such enthusiasm! You can find the instruction in > > the > > docs on how to enable

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 7/24/19 7:22 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:36:35PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 24. 07. 19 14:32, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote: > That said, having to go round adding a

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 23. 07. 19 22:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: How do I enroll? Great! We’re glad to see such enthusiasm! You can find the instruction in the docs on how to enable gating:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/gating/ Assuming I want to gate openssl for python_selftest from here:

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:22:01PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:36:35PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 24. 07. 19 14:32, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > > > On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > > > That

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:18:25PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: >On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 2:33 PM Josh Boyer <[1]jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> >wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok <[2]mhron...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:17:41PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 24/07/2019 14:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 02:13:02PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > > Then there's decision_context which apparently does nothing > > > but has to be there. > > > > It is used! It is

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:36:35PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 24. 07. 19 14:32, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > > That said, having to go round adding a mega ugly config file > > > > to every

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Kamil Paral
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 2:33 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > That said, having to go round adding a mega ugly config file > > > to every package that looks an awful lot like an internal braindump > >

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Tom Hughes
On 24/07/2019 14:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 02:13:02PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: Then there's decision_context which apparently does nothing but has to be there. It is used! It is what define which tests are used to gate the build/update when entering the -testing

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:57 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > > On 24/07/2019 13:32, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote: > >>> That said, having to go round adding a mega ugly config file > >>> to every package that

Re: [Heads up] Fedora Container base image is getting smaller

2019-07-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:09:24AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > Last couple days a bigger change [2] have been introduced in the > fedora:rawhide image. This change drops all the weak dependencies from > the base image which allowed us to have a smaller base image (215MB). This makes me happy.

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 02:13:02PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 24/07/2019 13:32, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > > That said, having to go round adding a mega ugly config file > > > > to every

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Boost 1.70 upgrade

2019-07-24 Thread Ben Cotton
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:02 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F31Boost170 > > == Summary == > This change brings Boost 1.70 to Fedora. This will mean Fedora ships > with a recent upstream Boost release. > This change, previously approved by FESCo, has been withdrawn

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Boost 1.70 upgrade

2019-07-24 Thread Ben Cotton
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:02 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F31Boost170 > > == Summary == > This change brings Boost 1.70 to Fedora. This will mean Fedora ships > with a recent upstream Boost release. > This change, previously approved by FESCo, has been withdrawn

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 24. 07. 19 14:32, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote: That said, having to go round adding a mega ugly config file to every package that looks an awful lot like an internal braindump from some system doesn't really

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: AArch64 Xfce Desktop image

2019-07-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:07:27AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:12:29PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > We currently offer Workstation, Minimal and Server images for use with > > > AArch64

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Simply reclaim disk space in Anaconda

2019-07-24 Thread Jiri Eischmann
Kamil Paral píše v St 24. 07. 2019 v 13:37 +0200: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:44 PM Ben Cotton > wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Anaconda_Reclaim_Disk_Space > > > > The Manual Partitioning screen supports all actions of the Resize > > Disk > > Space dialog, so it doesn't make

[Bug 1731013] Upgrade perl-Net-Stomp to 0.60

2019-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731013 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: AArch64 Xfce Desktop image

2019-07-24 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:28:12 +, you wrote: >On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:12:29PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: >> We currently offer Workstation, Minimal and Server images for use with >> AArch64 Single Board Computer's (SBC's). We would like to add a >> lighter weight desktop image for hardware

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Tom Hughes
On 24/07/2019 13:32, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote: That said, having to go round adding a mega ugly config file to every package that looks an awful lot like an internal braindump from some system doesn't really

[Bug 1731013] Upgrade perl-Net-Stomp to 0.60

2019-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731013 Bug 1731013 depends on bug 1732311, which changed state. Bug 1732311 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-NiceDump - Get a nice and human readable dump of objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732311 What|Removed

Re: ownership of /proc and /sys

2019-07-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 24.07.19 13:24, Jun Aruga (jar...@redhat.com) wrote: > Sorry I posted my previous email wrongly. > > > > I have bunch of ideas, but all of them ugly (e.g., not own that file and > > > create that directories in scriptlet). Do you > > > have any ideas about this situation? > > > > Make

Re: [Fontconfig] [RFC] target font model on Freedesktop systems

2019-07-24 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le 2019-07-24 13:49, Akira TAGOH a écrit : Hi Akira On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:45 PM Nicolas Mailhot wrote: No foo variable, foo hebrew, foo narrow, foo caption, just a single foo with different available features (full variability or fixed states on the default axis, real upstream provided

Re: [RFC] target font model on Freedesktop systems

2019-07-24 Thread Kevin Kofler
Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > 2. fontconfig strives to hide all the legacy ways to designate different > parts of this ideal font, and strives to expose a single "font" objet no > matter what quirks exist in individual font files. We stop exposing lots > of weird quirky bits right and left, that need

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: AArch64 Xfce Desktop image

2019-07-24 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:24 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:12:29PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > We currently offer Workstation, Minimal and Server images for use with > > AArch64 Single Board Computer's (SBC's). We would like to add a > > lighter weight

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote: > > That said, having to go round adding a mega ugly config file > > to every package that looks an awful lot like an internal braindump > > from some system doesn't really inspire confidence, or make

Fedora-Rawhide-20190724.n.0 compose check report

2019-07-24 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 45 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED:

[Bug 1732682] Upgrade perl-File-Copy-Recursive to 0.45

2019-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732682 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: [RFC] target font model on Freedesktop systems

2019-07-24 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 23 July 2019 at 15:45, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > Hi, > > Now that things are starting to move fonts-side[1], I’d like the various > actors to agree on a common font model target. [...] > Therefore, I’d like to propose that the target font model on freedesktop > systems, is

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190724.n.0 changes

2019-07-24 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190723.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190724.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:28 Upgraded packages: 101 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.43 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Simply reclaim disk space in Anaconda

2019-07-24 Thread Kamil Paral
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:44 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Anaconda_Reclaim_Disk_Space > > The Manual Partitioning screen supports all actions of the Resize Disk > Space dialog, so it doesn't make sense to have two user interfaces > with the same functionality. >

[Bug 1731804] Upgrade perl-Class-Inspector to 1.36

2019-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731804 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

2019-07-24 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:07 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Stephen Gallagher: > > > With my FESCo hat on, I can't support this action as currently stated. > > I think I'd be more inclined to consider it if the Change was proposed > > as a new architecture bring-up. Effectively, this would be a

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

2019-07-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
This meeting is going to be rescheduled to be 1 hour earlier to deal with conflicting meetings On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 14:35, wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >EPEL Steering Co on 2019-07-24 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT >At freenode@fedora-meeting > > The

Re: ownership of /proc and /sys

2019-07-24 Thread Jun Aruga
Sorry I posted my previous email wrongly. > > I have bunch of ideas, but all of them ugly (e.g., not own that file and > > create that directories in scriptlet). Do you > > have any ideas about this situation? > > Make systemd create them? It has to manage them anyway. I see this situation to

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 24. 07. 19 10:17, Dan Horák wrote: On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 22:51:28 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Good Morning Everyone, TL;DR: On July 24th we will turn on the first phase of Rawhide package gating, for single build updates. In a later phase, Rawhide updates that contain multiple builds

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote: That said, having to go round adding a mega ugly config file to every package that looks an awful lot like an internal braindump from some system doesn't really inspire confidence, or make for an easy way of opting in. This. The gating.yaml file is

[Bug 1732686] Upgrade perl-MCE-Shared to 1.843

2019-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732686 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: ownership of /proc and /sys

2019-07-24 Thread Jun Aruga
> I have bunch of ideas, but all of them ugly (e.g., not own that file and > create that directories in scriptlet). Do you > have any ideas about this situation? Make systemd create them? It has to manage them anyway. On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 5:30 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Di,

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: AArch64 Xfce Desktop image

2019-07-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:12:29PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > We currently offer Workstation, Minimal and Server images for use with > > AArch64 Single Board Computer's (SBC's). We would like to add a > > lighter weight

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:41:16AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 08:29:03AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Pierre-Yves Chibon: > >> > >> > Good Morning Everyone, > >> > > >> > TL;DR: On July 24th we will turn on the first phase of Rawhide

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MCE-Shared (master). "Update to 1.843 (..more)"

2019-07-24 Thread notifications
Notification time stamped 2019-07-24 10:26:08 UTC From 739eb917db5d364b8947be7f1a751d0188a7c206 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Jul 24 2019 10:23:49 + Subject: Update to 1.843 - New upstream release 1.843 - Updated results in MCE::Hobo (Parallel::ForkManager-like

[Bug 1732685] Upgrade perl-MCE to 1.843

2019-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732685 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: portable performance engineering

2019-07-24 Thread Kevin Kofler
Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kevin Kofler: >> As I wrote elsewhere in this huge thread: just turn the program into a >> library with a dummy main program. > > That requires manual work, so it's unclear how to do this for large > parts of the distribution. I would not do this for large parts of the

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:27:35AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:14:05AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:35:13PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > > > On

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

2019-07-24 Thread Florian Weimer
* Stephen Gallagher: > With my FESCo hat on, I can't support this action as currently stated. > I think I'd be more inclined to consider it if the Change was proposed > as a new architecture bring-up. Effectively, this would be a whole new > architecture that would just happen to be largely

Re: portable performance engineering

2019-07-24 Thread Florian Weimer
* Kevin Kofler: > Dave Love wrote: >> they'd be rather limited by the compiler options we're supposed to use, >> that don't include vectorization, so you don't even get the benefit you >> could from SSE2. (I've been told off in review for turning that on, >> though an FPC member has approved

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Florian Weimer
* Pierre-Yves Chibon: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 08:29:03AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Pierre-Yves Chibon: >> >> > Good Morning Everyone, >> > >> > TL;DR: On July 24th we will turn on the first phase of Rawhide package >> > gating, >> > for single build updates. >> >> How does this

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: AArch64 Xfce Desktop image

2019-07-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:12:29PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > We currently offer Workstation, Minimal and Server images for use with > AArch64 Single Board Computer's (SBC's). We would like to add a > lighter weight desktop image for hardware that lacks the ability to > run accelerated desktops.

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Peter Robinson
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:14:05AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:35:13PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > > On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > > > > > > When you run

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:17:20AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 22:51:28 +0200 > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > TL;DR: On July 24th we will turn on the first phase of Rawhide > > package gating, for single build updates. > > In a later phase,

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

2019-07-24 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:37 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 13:32 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 12:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On 7/22/19 10:34 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:31 AM Igor Gnatenko > > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Tom Hughes
On 24/07/2019 09:14, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:35:13PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in a new koji

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:14:05AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:35:13PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > > > > When you run `fedpkg build` on

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 22:51:28 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > TL;DR: On July 24th we will turn on the first phase of Rawhide > package gating, for single build updates. > In a later phase, Rawhide updates that contain multiple builds will > also be enabled for

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:35:13PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > > When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in a > > > new koji > > > tag (which will be

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 08:29:03AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > TL;DR: On July 24th we will turn on the first phase of Rawhide package > > gating, > > for single build updates. > > How does this interact with the mass rebuild? It

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:35:13PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in a new > > koji > > tag (which will be the default target for Rawhide). The package will be > > picked > > up

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

2019-07-24 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 24. 07. 19 8:29, Florian Weimer wrote: * Pierre-Yves Chibon: Good Morning Everyone, TL;DR: On July 24th we will turn on the first phase of Rawhide package gating, for single build updates. How does this interact with the mass rebuild? Will Fedora 31 release with an unrebuilt package if

Re: Request to take ownership of gimp-resynthetizer

2019-07-24 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 24. 07. 19 3:42, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Following the bug report[1], I would like to take ownership of gimp-resynthetizer because of its use on Fedora Design Suite Labs. Would it be possible to orphan that package? You can follow either:

[Bug 1732686] New: Upgrade perl-MCE-Shared to 1.843

2019-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732686 Bug ID: 1732686 Summary: Upgrade perl-MCE-Shared to 1.843 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-MCE-Shared Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

[Bug 1732685] New: Upgrade perl-MCE to 1.843

2019-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732685 Bug ID: 1732685 Summary: Upgrade perl-MCE to 1.843 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-MCE Assignee: p...@city-fan.org Reporter:

[Bug 1732682] New: Upgrade perl-File-Copy-Recursive to 0.45

2019-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732682 Bug ID: 1732682 Summary: Upgrade perl-File-Copy-Recursive to 0.45 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-File-Copy-Recursive Assignee:

Re: [Heads up] Fedora Container base image is getting smaller

2019-07-24 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Happy to help! On Wed, Jul 24, 2019, 08:13 Clement Verna wrote: > Hi all, > > The Container SIG has been busy in the last few weeks working on > getting the Fedora container base image smaller (It was growing over > 300MB). While a few minor changes [0-1] have recently landed in the >

[389-devel] lib389 lack a type for nsAdminGroup

2019-07-24 Thread Anuj Borah
Hi all, Please correct me if subject line a wrong , as i cat not find one . Regards Anuj Borah ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

  1   2   >