https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765422
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711098
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Convert-UUlib-1.6-1.fc |perl-Convert-UUlib-1.6-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760397
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765033
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768145
Bug ID: 1768145
Summary: Please provide EPEL8 package
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-INET6Glue
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 at 14:03, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> James Cassell wrote:
> > When I asked, the answer was that it costs money to do custom redirects,
> > and the old site is going away "soon" so it would be overcome by events
> > sooner or later.
>
> This just shows how bad an idea it is to rely
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744709
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768131
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768131
Bug ID: 1768131
Summary: [RFE] EPEL7, EPEL8 branch of perl-Text-Table
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Table
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767613
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767613
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-e377dd6fa1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e377dd6fa1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019, at 2:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> James Cassell wrote:
> > When I asked, the answer was that it costs money to do custom redirects,
> > and the old site is going away "soon" so it would be overcome by events
> > sooner or later.
>
> This just shows how bad an idea it is to
James Cassell wrote:
> When I asked, the answer was that it costs money to do custom redirects,
> and the old site is going away "soon" so it would be overcome by events
> sooner or later.
This just shows how bad an idea it is to rely on third-party-hosted
services. If this were self-hosted Free
Please, see vitetris:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765917
On 02/11/19 14:16, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I knew the day would come and it finally did. After OpenCASCADE changed
> to a true FOSS license the OCE (OpenCASCADE Community Edition) stopped
> releasing new versions and is now
I knew the day would come and it finally did. After OpenCASCADE changed to
a true FOSS license the OCE (OpenCASCADE Community Edition) stopped
releasing new versions and is now way out of date and no longer functions
properly with FreeCAD.
I can do a review in exchange if needed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762269
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762271
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Notification time stamped 2019-11-02 11:34:19 UTC
From eadfcb2c92c0005c7e4f6332adb3c3772fc8b73c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Nov 02 2019 11:29:00 +
Subject: EPEL-8 post-bootstrap rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Mail-Message.spec b/perl-Mail-Message.spec
index
Hi!
I'm working with Apache Zookeeper package [1], trying to update to the
last Fedora versions. The last version of Zookeeper is using Apache
Yetus [2] for Javadocs annotations (Yetus Audience Annotations). Yetus
artifacts are totally missing in Fedora packages (no Yetus package at
all). Is
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 10:51:08 +0100, Markus Larsson wrote:
>
> If this has made you feel bad I apologize. I mean you no harm in any way.
> Clearly my tone has been off here since I managed to offend you.
No worries. I am sorry too---my tone wasn't the best either.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur
On 2 November 2019 10:18:20 CET, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 09:23:37 +0100, Markus Larsson wrote:
>> Not having this planned for and sorted before the change is sloppy.
>> Sadly this kind of attitude towards breakage in a production
>> environment seems makes fedora look bad and
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 16:24:02 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> ankursinha
> python-tasklib
> (BuildRequires: python2-pytz → PY2)
Thanks for removing the BR Miro. tasklib looks OK for py3 now.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 09:23:37 +0100, Markus Larsson wrote:
> Not having this planned for and sorted before the change is sloppy.
> Sadly this kind of attitude towards breakage in a production
> environment seems makes fedora look bad and like we as a community
> can't even keep simple services
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 22:58:00 +0100, Tim Jackson wrote:
> I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora, was there
> a reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing solutions,
> rather than just putting the new system on a different domain? Or, failing
> that, at
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 09:12:21 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 11. 19 22:58, Tim Jackson wrote:
> > I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora, was
> > there a reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing
> > solutions, rather than just putting the new
On 2 November 2019 09:12:21 CET, "Miro Hrončok" wrote:
>On 01. 11. 19 22:58, Tim Jackson wrote:
>> I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora,
>was there a
>> reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing
>solutions, rather
>> than just putting the new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767602
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766202
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762930
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
On 01. 11. 19 22:58, Tim Jackson wrote:
I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora, was there a
reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing solutions, rather
than just putting the new system on a different domain? Or, failing that, at
least adding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768068
Bug ID: 1768068
Summary: perl-perlfaq-5.20191102 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-perlfaq
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
31 matches
Mail list logo
