https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775789
--- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth ---
Well now that you have this ticket you can reference it in the update for the
EPEL-8 package when you've built it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776110
Bug ID: 1776110
Summary: Upgrade perl-Specio to 0.45
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Specio
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776107
Bug ID: 1776107
Summary: Upgrade perl-MCE-Shared to 1.863
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-MCE-Shared
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776106
Bug ID: 1776106
Summary: Upgrade perl-MCE to 1.863
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-MCE
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter:
Hello Orion and Kevin,
Orion, many thanks for sponsoring us! This helps will help us
tremendously. I have tested a few server and the connection works great.
Gene and I are very grateful!
Kevin, thank you greatly also for helping us with sponsorship for the
additional group.
Best regards,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776105
Bug ID: 1776105
Summary: perl-MCE-1.863 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-MCE
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Yes, it is a bug and is already reported:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769788
Marek Blaha
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 1:20 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> I can't reproduce this with Fedora Workstation 31, as released, clean
> installed. 'dnf autoremove' returns nothing to remove. After
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8905ccaea7
libidn2-2.3.0-1.el6
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
pspg-2.6.0-1.el6
Details about builds:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/11/25/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.4-20191125gita370f8d.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-1563c1eaf3
chromium-78.0.3904.97-1.el8
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d9bc350179
mingw-libidn2-2.3.0-1.el8
1
On Saturday, November 23, 2019 12:53:03 AM MST Raphael Groner wrote:
> Upstream merged the patch for python3. Could someone give some love to
> the package of pdf-stapler?
>
> Otherwise, we'd run into danger to see this package get retired due to
> lack of python3 support.
This is precisely why
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775789
--- Comment #6 from John Heidemann ---
Thanks. I had a non-expired token that I got for this purpose.
But at your prompting I got a new token and also chmod'ed the fedpkg.conf
go-rwx. One of those two things fixed it and seems to have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770291
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
I can't reproduce this with Fedora Workstation 31, as released, clean
installed. 'dnf autoremove' returns nothing to remove. After fully
updating as of 2019.11.24, rebooting, and re-running 'dnf autoremove'
I get this:
[chris@localhost-live ~]$ sudo dnf autoremove
[sudo] password for chris:
Last
On 11/24/19 3:26 PM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
I install 'Development Tools', but some tools are not in this group and
PythonLibrary is not set. Any idea how to fix it?
dnf group install 'Development Tools'
dnf install cmake
dnf install gcc-c++
See output of build from source for krita
I install 'Development Tools', but some tools are not in this group and
PythonLibrary is not set. Any idea how to fix it?
dnf group install 'Development Tools'
dnf install cmake
dnf install gcc-c++
See output of build from source for krita 4.2.8
[mythcat@localhost build]$ cmake
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 12:00:23PM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 11:54 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
>
> > when building libnm for Fedora 31, I noticed a recent increase in
> > size.
>
> this seems to be the RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775885
Recent
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 07:40:26PM +0100, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello, Alexander!
> Thanks for starting this thread. I'm adding the SciTech SIG mailing list
> to Cc.
>
> On Saturday, 23 November 2019 at 13:52, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> [...]
> > Now I'd argue that the changes in
Hello, Alexander!
Thanks for starting this thread. I'm adding the SciTech SIG mailing list
to Cc.
On Saturday, 23 November 2019 at 13:52, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
[...]
> Now I'd argue that the changes in v3.0.0 would be worth bending the
> rules and updating everything in stable Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775949
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775949
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775945
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775947
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 11:54 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> when building libnm for Fedora 31, I noticed a recent increase in
> size.
this seems to be the RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775885
best,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
when building libnm for Fedora 31, I noticed a recent increase in size.
It also happens locally when I use rpmbuild (or fedpkg local), but see
for example the NetworkManager-libnm package on x86_64:
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1409043
[2]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775789
--- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth ---
No, it's saying you've got an expired Pagure token.
Get a new token from https://pagure.io/settings/token/new (I usually tick all
the boxes) and it goes in ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf
Then try the fedpkg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774235
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774599
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-29-20191123.0):
ID: 488098 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
31 matches
Mail list logo
