https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793146
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d2b004c685 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d2b004c685
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793146
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ebb35aefc3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ebb35aefc3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793146
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793146
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:20:08PM +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-01-13 at 10:34 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > (2) The new values must be larger than all historical values (across
> > all historical Fedora releases). That assures than a new build won't
> > become obsoleted because of
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 5:58 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> I've been thinking about ways to solve this for a while, and I'm coming
> to the conclusion that the best plan is probably to just ship pre-built
> initramfs images. I can think of three main reasons to want to use
> system-specific
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 03:53:51PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Because this is blocking merge of the side tag [1], I am going to build
> them again.
Thanks - if there's still a problem after both tags are merged
then I'll build them again afterwards.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 08:53:59PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 11:32:30PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> ...snip...
> >
> > Sounds interesting!
> > Koji might suffer from the database dump cron job ... though I'm not
> > sure at which time of day it's supposed to run.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792861
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Exporter-5.74-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/01/21/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.1-20200121gitd24352c.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2020-01-21 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-db6621b9a8
perl-Clipboard-0.21-1.el6.1
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
pspg-2.6.6-1.el6
Details about builds:
Looks like python-userpath exists already, albeit for rawhide only.
I'd like to review pipx (this will be my first review). If you could in
turn review mopidy-mpd, that would be greatly appreciated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1792086
On 1/20/20 7:57 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> I've been thinking about ways to solve this for a while, and I'm coming
> to the conclusion that the best plan is probably to just ship pre-built
> initramfs images. I can think of three main reasons to want to use
> system-specific images:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020, at 7:57 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I've been thinking about ways to solve this for a while, and I'm coming
> to the conclusion that the best plan is probably to just ship pre-built
> initramfs images.
rpm-ostree[1] (used for Fedora CoreOS and Silverblue and IoT among
Measured boot involves generating cryptographic measurements of boot
components and configuration and using that to either control access to
a local secret (in the case of sealing secrets to a TPM) or proving to
another device (eg, a remote server or a local phone) what was booted.
We're
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792861
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793185
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-XXX-0.34 is available |perl-XXX-0.35 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793228
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
The following Sources of the specfile are not valid URLs so we cannot
automatically build the new version for you. Please use URLs in your Source
declarations if possible.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793228
Bug ID: 1793228
Summary: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events-1.96 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793203
Bug ID: 1793203
Summary: perl-DBD-Pg-3.10.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-Pg
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792672
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793185
Bug ID: 1793185
Summary: perl-XXX-0.34 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XXX
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
In keeping with FESCo's approval[1] of a keepalive requirement, the
following Spins and Labs are marked for retirement in Fedora 32 unless
the maintainer replies to the keepalive request or a new maintainer
steps up.
1. Jam Audio[2] (keepalive[3])
2. Scientific[4] (keepalive[5])
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793152
Bug ID: 1793152
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200120 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793146
Bug ID: 1793146
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200120 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 4:24 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 15:02 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Do you have any tests to compare plain squashfs xz with zstd? The nested
> > ext4 stuff is really pointless now because Fedora hasn't used 'dd' +
> > resizing the ext4 file system
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 04:33, Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le jeudi 16 janvier 2020 à 22:24 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit :
>
> Hi Neal,
>
> > I've also said that I don't think we can handle it as our
> > infrastructure currently stands. Our build system tooling has
> > suffered from a decade
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 03:59, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 1/17/20 3:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 01:16, Chris Adams wrote:
> >>
> >> Once upon a time, Nico Kadel-Garcia said:
> >>> Is there any software or service that currently uses Berkeley DB that
> >>>
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 1/15/20 3:33 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 15. 01. 20 v 13:33 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 1/15/20 2:13 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 13. 01. 20 v 14:05 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
%changelog
%include changelog
+1
As I
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 08:19:36AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
Just catching up on this thread...
How about an incremental step? (I don't know how difficult it would be to
implement however)...
What about separating the change log to a separate file in dist-git?
Something like the traditional
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Haskell_Stackage_LTS_14
== Summary ==
Haskell libraries and packages will be updated from Stackage LTS 13 to
the new versions in Stackage LTS 14.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Petersen| Jens Petersen]]
* Email:
* Name: [[Haskell_SIG| Haskell SIG]]
* Email:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Haskell_Stackage_LTS_14
== Summary ==
Haskell libraries and packages will be updated from Stackage LTS 13 to
the new versions in Stackage LTS 14.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Petersen| Jens Petersen]]
* Email:
* Name: [[Haskell_SIG| Haskell SIG]]
* Email:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3-rdiff-backup
== Summary ==
rdiff-backup is a python based backup tool. While development stopped
for many years, it's now resumed upstream and a python3 port has been
(almost) completed. Unfortunately, the python2 and python3 versions
will not
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 10:20, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Some user requested an update from dnscrypt-proxy 1 to dnscrypt-proxy 2,
> which is totally incompatible and not even programmed in the same language.
> As far as I understand, such update is frowned upon as it would break
Hey Petr!
On Mon, 2020-01-13 at 10:34 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> (2) The new values must be larger than all historical values (across
> all historical Fedora releases). That assures than a new build won't
> become obsoleted because of a decreased release.
can you clarify what you mean with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793082
Bug ID: 1793082
Summary: Upgrade perl-Tie-DBI to 1.08
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Tie-DBI
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793081
Bug ID: 1793081
Summary: Upgrade perl-Term-ANSIColor to 5.01
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Term-ANSIColor
Assignee: dd...@cpan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792674
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2020-01-20)
=
Meeting started by dcantrell at 15:00:03 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-01-20/fesco.2020-01-20-15.00.log.html
.
Hello
Some user requested an update from dnscrypt-proxy 1 to dnscrypt-proxy 2,
which is totally incompatible and not even programmed in the same language.
As far as I understand, such update is frowned upon as it would break existinq
installations. Shall I then create a dnscrypt-proxy2
Dear maintainers.
Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching
(2020-02-03).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792674
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792558
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792997
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok ---
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Because this is blocking merge of the side tag [1], I am going to build
them again.
Vít
[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-223644200d
Dne 20. 01. 20 v 11:55 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> There happened mid air collision between OCaml rebuilds and Ruby
> rebuilds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792997
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||redhat-rpm-config-148-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792997
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792997
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ---
Now I got message that annobin is back. Checking.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
* Florian Weimer:
> I'm disabling annobin temporarily so that the GCC 10 transition in the
> buildroot will hopefully be a bit smoother than usual. Packages built
> during the temporary change will hopefully be rebuilt during the mass
> rebuild.
This redhat-rpm-config change is complete and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792997
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
s/do not lost/lost/ (I should not rewrite my comments from a middle of a
sentence.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792997
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com
--
You are receiving
Hi all,
My name is Javier and I am Spaniard. I have been using Linux for more than 15
years (10 at a professional level). I have worked mainly as a System Engineer
and Database (Oracle/MySQL) Engineer for many years in a few IT companies in
Spain and the US.
I am contributing fedora since
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792997
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:42 PM Bohdan Khomutskyi
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks everyone for posting feedback.
> More benchmarking results are available at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Changes/OptimizeSquashFS,
> including the 'plain' SquashFS filesystem.
> After performing the tests,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792558
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Neal Gompa wrote:
> * building containers, ISOs, disk images
+1 (at least installable live ISOs).
> using kiwi and/or appliance-tools+livecd-tools/lorax
I vote for livecd-creator from livecd-tools, it is the easiest to use
(and in particular, livecd-creator accepts kickstarts from
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> * We removed outdated chroots, which allowed us to reclaim terabytes of
> disk space. At the same time, we give you the option to keep those old
> repos if you want them.
> http://frostyx.cz/posts/copr-removing-outdated-chroots
For what it's worth, I never got the promised
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792861
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ddb8870ef6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ddb8870ef6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792861
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792861
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 15:02 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Do you have any tests to compare plain squashfs xz with zstd? The nested
> ext4 stuff is really pointless now because Fedora hasn't used 'dd' +
> resizing the ext4 file system as an installation method in a long time
> (going back to Fedora
There happened mid air collision between OCaml rebuilds and Ruby
rebuilds unfortunately. At least the following packages were build
against old Ruby and will need rebuild again:
nbdkit
libguestfs
hivex
Will you build them in f32-build-side-17977 side tag? Should I build
them again or will
I'm disabling annobin temporarily so that the GCC 10 transition in the
buildroot will hopefully be a bit smoother than usual. Packages built
during the temporary change will hopefully be rebuilt during the mass
rebuild.
Thanks,
Florian
___
devel
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 06. 01. 20 23:41, Peter Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 02:48:22PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
If you don't have the time to make a new build once every year, you
shouldn't be a packager, full stop.
I think that's a fair point, but not at all the issue here. I
specifically want not
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Dear maintainers.
Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching
(2020-02-03).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792861
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old
sources. It's likely this package does not use the version macro in its Source
URLs. If possible, please update the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792861
Bug ID: 1792861
Summary: perl-Exporter-5.74 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Exporter
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 1/17/20 3:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 01:16, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Nico Kadel-Garcia said:
Is there any software or service that currently uses Berkeley DB that
cannot reasonably be discarded and rebuilt from scratch for new
versions of that
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 09:37:32AM +0100, Bohdan Khomutskyi wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Thanks for your feedback and comments, it's very valuable to me.
>
> In my previous message, I mentioned that CPU is *underutilized* during
> installation. I haven't investigated further why, but I suspect it's due
On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 10:08:07AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> In my testing, xz does provide better compression ratios, well suited
> for seldom used images like archives. But it really makes the
> installation experience worse by soaking the CPU, times thousands of
> installations (openQA tests
Chris,
Thanks for your feedback and comments, it's very valuable to me.
In my previous message, I mentioned that CPU is *underutilized* during
installation. I haven't investigated further why, but I suspect it's due to
the inefficiency caused by the usage of the *loop* device and/or
inefficiency
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
75 matches
Mail list logo
