[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2020-04-25 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7f0ce51dbd python-bleach-3.1.4-2.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-72116e7775 chromium-81.0.4044.122-1.el8 1

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-25 Thread John Reiser
On 4/25/20 12:24 UTC, Kevin Kofler wrote: Richard Shaw wrote: As far as LCPNet itself I've communicated with the primary developer quite a bit over the last week. LPCNet *will not work* without optimizations (at least not in real time which is the point). Has anyone (upstream or elsewhere)

Re: cryptominisat soname bump

2020-04-25 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 5:39 PM Jerry James wrote: > I'm building cryptominisat 5.7.0 in Rawhide. This involves an soname > bump, so I am also rebuilding its dependencies: cvc4, stp, yices, and > sagemath. Except I can't rebuild sagemath because jmol and jsmol have been retired. It will be

cryptominisat soname bump

2020-04-25 Thread Jerry James
I'm building cryptominisat 5.7.0 in Rawhide. This involves an soname bump, so I am also rebuilding its dependencies: cvc4, stp, yices, and sagemath. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: coreos-assembler v0.8.0

2020-04-25 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On 4/25/20 6:50 AM, Micah Abbott wrote: The CoreOS team is pleased to announce the latest release of `coreos-assembler` - our opinionated build tool that we use to build and test Fedora CoreOS and Red Hat CoreOS. https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/releases/tag/v0.8.0 The team created

NeuroFedora review swap: python-spyking-circus

2020-04-25 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, Would anyone like to swap simple reviews please? I'd like to get python-spyking-circus reviewed for NeuroFedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827948 Description: SpyKING CIRCUS is a python code to allow fast spike sorting on multi channel recordings. A publication on the

[Bug 1827947] New: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.78 is available

2020-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827947 Bug ID: 1827947 Summary: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.78 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Code-TidyAll Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+

2020-04-25 Thread Justin Forbes
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 10:21 AM Daiki Ueno wrote: > > Hello Ondrej, > > Ondrej Mosnacek writes: > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:12 PM Ondrej Mosnacek > > wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:50 PM Ondrej Mosnacek > >> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:12 AM Daiki Ueno > >> >

Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+

2020-04-25 Thread James Cassell
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:12 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:50 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:12 AM Daiki Ueno > > > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I am not sure if this

Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+

2020-04-25 Thread Daiki Ueno
Hello Ondrej, Ondrej Mosnacek writes: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:12 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:50 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:12 AM Daiki Ueno wrote: >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > I am not sure if this deserves a Fedora Change

coreos-assembler v0.8.0

2020-04-25 Thread Micah Abbott
The CoreOS team is pleased to announce the latest release of `coreos-assembler` - our opinionated build tool that we use to build and test Fedora CoreOS and Red Hat CoreOS. https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/releases/tag/v0.8.0 The team created `coreos-assembler` as a way to bind

[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200425.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2020-04-25 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200425.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: boost package in fedora

2020-04-25 Thread Vascom
Thank you. пт, 24 апр. 2020 г., 14:40 Jonathan Wakely : > On 20/04/20 15:43 +0300, Vascom wrote: > >Will Boost ever be updated on Fedora again? > > > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558278 > > Yes. > ___ > devel mailing list --

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-25 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 7:24 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote: > > As far as LCPNet itself I've communicated with the primary developer > quite > > a bit over the last week. LPCNet *will not work* without optimizations > (at > > least not in real time which is the point). > > Has

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-25 Thread Jun Aruga
Hi Rechard, I recommend using the simde (SIMD Everywhere) library for the packaging and contribution to the upstream. https://github.com/nemequ/simde You do not need to care about the availability by arch or compiler when using this library. simde-devel is available in Fedora stable versions

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-25 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard Shaw wrote: > As far as LCPNet itself I've communicated with the primary developer quite > a bit over the last week. LPCNet *will not work* without optimizations (at > least not in real time which is the point). Has anyone (upstream or elsewhere) ever looked into doing an SSE2 version of

Fedora-IoT-33-20200425.0 compose check report

2020-04-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200423.0): ID: 586597 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/586597 ID: 586598 Test:

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-25 Thread Kevin Kofler
Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Linux thinkpad 5.5.16-200.fc31.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 8 16:43:33 UTC 2020 > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > [ > /proc/cpuinfo: > > flags : ... avx ... And even that is not safe to assume. The baseline is SSE2, nothing more. No SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2,

Boost 1.73.0 will obsolete boost-nowide in rawhide

2020-04-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
Hi, I've just created a change proposal to update Boost in rawhide to the latest upstream package, 1.73.0, due out any day now. This will include Boost.Nowide, so I think the standalone boost-nowide currently in Fedora should be retired for F33. The alternative would be to omit the nowide

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-25 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 6:10 PM Steven Munroe wrote: > > The Linux kernel notified each process of the Platform and Hardware > Capabilities it the AUX Vector (Defined in the Application Binary > Interface Document for each platform). The compilers provide a easy to > use interface to interrogate

Re: Previous awesome background images

2020-04-25 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mohan Boddu wrote: > My personal favorite is Fedora 26 > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wallpapers#Fedora_26 > > I am not an artist, but the silhouette of the calming woods with the > reflection it on the lake is just *serene*. I think that one is artistically beautiful, but the deep winter

Re: Previous awesome background images

2020-04-25 Thread Kevin Kofler
Chris Murphy wrote: > I have the benefit of looking at the background on a crap laptop > display as well as a rather nice NEC self-calibrating display suitable > for medical imaging. And this background looks good to me on both > displays. That's non-trivial to achieve, there are always

Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+

2020-04-25 Thread Ondrej Mosnacek
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:12 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:50 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:12 AM Daiki Ueno wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am not sure if this deserves a Fedora Change proposal, so I'd like to > > > hear any opinions first

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200425.0 compose check report

2020-04-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200425.0 compose check report

2020-04-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 586595 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/586595 -- Mail generated by check-compose:

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200425.0 compose check report

2020-04-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Quick review

2020-04-25 Thread Greg Hellings
I have what should be a very simple review here. Just a MinGW build of an existing Fedora package. Anyone looking for something simple, or a quick swap? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827887 --Greg ___ devel mailing list --