No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 09:39:58AM -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> In Ceph we do this at a slightly different point of time. We use
> "rdopkg tag-patches" to save each of the "patches" refs that we've
> translated into patch series in dist-git. Each Git tag is the NVR of
> the package.
>
> We rebase an
On Saturday, May 9, 2020 11:58:43 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 10. 05. 20 0:09, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, May 9, 2020 2:40:02 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> >> On 09. 05. 20 22:56, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 3:38:36 PM MST Mir
On 08. 05. 20 16:24, Richard Shaw wrote:
There were a bunch of python2 packages that needed to be removed which
necessitated --allowerasing which I've never had to do before.
Do you still have that list? Maybe in `dnf history`? If so, we can make the
experience nicer, but I cannot help without
On 09. 05. 20 22:58, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Friday, May 8, 2020 7:24:14 AM MST Richard Shaw wrote:
Not that it's a huge deal for me but I wouldn't call the upgrade smooth.
There were a bunch of python2 packages that needed to be removed which
necessitated --allowerasing which I've never ha
On 08. 05. 20 17:02, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 10:55 am, Scott Talbert wrote:
Speaking of fedora-obsolete-packages, that package got removed from my system
on upgrade from F31->F32. Is that expected?
Without fedora-obsolete-packages installed, maintaining an upgrade pat
On 08. 05. 20 16:55, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 8 May 2020, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Not that it's a huge deal for me but I wouldn't call the upgrade smooth.
There were a bunch of python2 packages that needed to be removed which
necessitated --allowerasing which I've never had to d
On 10. 05. 20 20:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Basically we are switching from 'I go and install
fedora-obsolete-packages and have opted in to it' to 'I have to go
explictly exclude it to keep my obsolete packges'.
As others have pointed out, this was never the case of 'I go and install
fedora-obsole
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200509.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200510.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 37
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 224.84 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 09:30:26PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 8:49 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 08:20:52PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 10. 05. 20 18:37, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 10 May 2020, Barry Scott wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 8:49 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 08:20:52PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 10. 05. 20 18:37, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > > On Sun, 10 May 2020, Barry Scott wrote:
> > >
> > > > I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use
> > > > so
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 08:20:52PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 10. 05. 20 18:37, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 May 2020, Barry Scott wrote:
> >
> > > I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use
> > > some python 2 code
> > > on one of my servers. It's clearly on me t
Hi
I couldn't reproduce the issue anymore, so I suppose it was some
transient issue.
Thanks
Sandro
On 08.05.20 12:04, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 11:54:07AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm hitting the following error (and other similar ones) with this
qt-creator build [1]
On 10. 05. 20 18:37, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2020, Barry Scott wrote:
I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use some python 2
code
on one of my servers. It's clearly on me to maintain the old code if I choose
to use it.
I use MoinMoin via mon_wsgi.
After u
> On 10 May 2020, at 17:45, Igor Raits wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Sun, 2020-05-10 at 17:31 +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
>> I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use some
>> python 2 code
>> on one of my servers. It's clearly on me to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, 2020-05-10 at 17:31 +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
> I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use some
> python 2 code
> on one of my servers. It's clearly on me to maintain the old code if
> I choose to use it.
>
> I use Moin
On Sun, 10 May 2020, Barry Scott wrote:
I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use some python 2
code
on one of my servers. It's clearly on me to maintain the old code if I choose
to use it.
I use MoinMoin via mon_wsgi.
After upgrading to fedora 32 I took the trouble to
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 12:32 PM Barry Scott wrote:
>
> I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use some python
> 2 code
> on one of my servers. It's clearly on me to maintain the old code if I choose
> to use it.
>
> I use MoinMoin via mon_wsgi.
>
> After upgrading to fedor
I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use some python 2
code
on one of my servers. It's clearly on me to maintain the old code if I choose
to use it.
I use MoinMoin via mon_wsgi.
After upgrading to fedora 32 I took the trouble to install moin using the F31
package.
And a
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Hi everybody,
I have just orphaned both felix-framework and felix-osgi-obr-resolver,
since none of the packages maintained by the Stewardship SIG depend on
them any longer. We transitioned onto OSGi 7.0.0 / osgi-core where
possible, and other users of those APIs should probably do that too.
Fabio
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200510.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, 2020-05-10 at 14:39 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 10/05/20 14:28, Igor Raits wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-05-10 at 14:14 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
> > > Hi all.
> >
> > Hi Antonio,
> >
> > > `zipper` library will be upgraded to the releas
On 10/05/20 14:28, Igor Raits wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-10 at 14:14 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>
> Hi Antonio,
>
>> `zipper` library will be upgraded to the release 1.0.1 with a soname
>> bump in a week.
>
> Thanks a lot for announcing this.
>
>> Dependent packages:
>> COPASI
>> lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, 2020-05-10 at 14:14 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi all.
Hi Antonio,
> `zipper` library will be upgraded to the release 1.0.1 with a soname
> bump in a week.
Thanks a lot for announcing this.
> Dependent packages:
> COPASI
> libCombine
Hi all.
`zipper` library will be upgraded to the release 1.0.1 with a soname
bump in a week.
Dependent packages:
COPASI
libCombine
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.a
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Hi,
Well, *my* packaging workflow is pretty simple:
1. point to the upstream git repo in my spec file with %{forgeurl} and
the rest of the forge macros
2. point to the target upstream tag or commit with the associated
variable
3. spectool (or co from lookaside if already there)
4. build
If I nee
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 595139 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/595139
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.i
On 10. 05. 20 0:09, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Saturday, May 9, 2020 2:40:02 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 05. 20 22:56, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 3:38:36 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
The command that the user executes is "python3.9", not "python39".
Let's b
30 matches
Mail list logo
