https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833463
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833836
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749126
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Oops, almost forgot to reply to this...
On 5/5/20 1:36 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 05. 05. 20 8:43, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Hmm, OTOH this is a bit questionable: macro primitives can only take
arguments in the %{foo:bar} form, so perhaps the non-%{} form actually
should fall through silently.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833463
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833097
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833325
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ee57378388 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ee57378388
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834195
--- Comment #1 from Peter Ajamian ---
I should note that a workaround for this is:
dnf install
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/8/Everything/x86_64/Packages/p/perl-Set-Crontab-1.03-23.el8.noarch.rpm
other_packages_here ...
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834195
Bug ID: 1834195
Summary: perl-Set-Crontab missing from epel8 repository
metadata
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Set-Crontab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833097
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Dne 11. 05. 20 v 9:43 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> , IMHO it would be better to make the user interface
> stronger: have dnf say what is removed and why (when obsoleted)
+1
But we should realize that DNF actually does not have user interface. IMHO this
should be only exposed using
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 595432 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/595432
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
On 11. 05. 20 11:00, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that qt5-devel has been dropped. Is the idea to force
all other packages to change
Requires: qt5-devel
into
Requires: qt5-qtbase
Requires: qt5-qtbase-gui
Requires: qt5-qtbase-mysql
Requires: qt5-qtbase-postgresql
Requires:
Now we must use qt5-qtbase-devel.
пн, 11 мая 2020 г., 12:01 Susi Lehtola :
> Hi,
>
>
> I just noticed that qt5-devel has been dropped. Is the idea to force
> all other packages to change
>
> Requires: qt5-devel
>
> into
>
> Requires: qt5-qtbase
> Requires: qt5-qtbase-gui
> Requires:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:42 AM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> ## GitForge Updates
> * We are tracking our progress here (nothing new added yet, fyi)
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Git_forge_update
> * And the council are tracking the community issues in this ticket
>
Hi,
I just noticed that qt5-devel has been dropped. Is the idea to force
all other packages to change
Requires: qt5-devel
into
Requires: qt5-qtbase
Requires: qt5-qtbase-gui
Requires: qt5-qtbase-mysql
Requires: qt5-qtbase-postgresql
Requires: qt5-qtconnectivity
Requires: qt5-qtdeclarative
# CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11
---
title: CPE Weekly status email
tags: CPE Weekly, email
---
Background:
The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining
IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS.Check out our teams
info here https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/
On 25. 03. 20 23:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 25. 03. 20 21:51, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed in the spins list [1], we are adding the ability to ping
maintainers of spins or labs in compose failure tickets [2]. I made a
list of maintainers [3] from the existing kickstart files, please
On 11. 05. 20 9:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
The idea solution IMHO would be to allow erasing only the packages
that do not belong to a distupgrade repository. Possibly to have
that option only for the Fedora repos, so packages installed from a
thrid-party would not get erased.
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833325
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting this week on
Monday (today) at 1800UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode).
https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro
The channel is bridged to Telegram, so you can also join us there on the
@NeuroFedora group:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:47:32AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 10. 05. 20 20:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >Basically we are switching from 'I go and install
> >fedora-obsolete-packages and have opted in to it' to 'I have to go
> >explictly exclude it to keep my obsolete packges'.
>
> As others
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833325
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
