The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
646 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
388 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
386
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d5bbc97415
json-c12-0.12.1-4.el6
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-db3d7a1399
exim-4.92.3-2.el6
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838904
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-perlfaq-5.20200522 is |perl-perlfaq-5.20200523
On 5/21/20 2:21 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
Sundials will be updated to the release `5.3.0` on Rawhide, not before
next 7 days.
Involved packages:
dolfin
octave
python-steps
Have test builds been done in copr or similar?
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems
On 5/20/20 5:54 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
It's entirely possible there its just another file trigger bug, it
wouldn't be the first one uncovered by texlive. Please file a bug on rpm
with reproducer info and lets work from there.
- Panu -
Thanks for replying Panu. As near as we can
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/05/22/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.2-20200521gitc350ddc.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838904
Bug ID: 1838904
Summary: perl-perlfaq-5.20200522 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-perlfaq
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a
side tag.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9
If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package,
please don't rebuild it in regular rawhide.
If you need to, please let me
On 21. 05. 20 19:26, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If everything goes extremely well, I expect us to start rebuilding the
initial
bootstrap sequence (438 srpms) in Koji side tag this week, the remaining
packages (2733) the next week. We expect some packages to fail (~200-300)
and
merge the side tag, so
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-05-22 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname EPEL
#topic
Hi all.
Sundials will be updated to the release `5.3.0` on Rawhide, not before
next 7 days.
Involved packages:
dolfin
octave
python-steps
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
On 5/21/20 11:36 AM, Przemo Firszt wrote:
"FreeCAD -t 0" performs approx 470 tests. No GUI required. Example
output starts here:
That is not the case for me (freecad-0.18.4-5.fc31.x86_64):
...
test60 (PathTests.TestPathLog.TestPathLog)
Verify track handles no argument. ...
I did a local update and tested it, being innocuous enough I went and and
updated and am performing builds now. Hopefully madko will show back up
at some point.
I also did a local build for EPEL 8 but it needs two python packages:
psutil & future
Both built fine from Fedora master so when I get
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 7:04 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:56 AM Aleksandra Fedorova
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 6:30 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:37 AM Przemo Firszt wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "FreeCAD -t 0" performs approx 470 tests.
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:43 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Also, if you are doing some build(s) that you are not in a hurry for/are
> less important, you can launch the builds with: --background and they
> will run at a lower priority.
That reminds me of a story I read, I think in one of Andy
Hi,
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 11:09 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On 14. 04. 20 11:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > The following packages are orphaned...
> > >
> > > GConf2alexl, caillon,
> > > caolanm, 1 weeks ago
> >
> > firefox (maintained by: alexl,
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:56 AM Aleksandra Fedorova
wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 6:30 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:37 AM Przemo Firszt wrote:
> >>
> >> "FreeCAD -t 0" performs approx 470 tests. No GUI required. Example
> >> output starts here:
> >>
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 6:30 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:37 AM Przemo Firszt wrote:
>>
>> "FreeCAD -t 0" performs approx 470 tests. No GUI required. Example
>> output starts here:
>> https://travis-ci.org/github/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/jobs/689681966#L9103
>
>
> May need some
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 03:25:08PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:04 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
> > Practically, this means that your build will wait longer to find a builder
> > available and as a result the whole build process will feel slower. The
> > builds per say
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837021
Charles R. Anderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:37 AM Przemo Firszt wrote:
> "FreeCAD -t 0" performs approx 470 tests. No GUI required. Example
> output starts here:
> https://travis-ci.org/github/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/jobs/689681966#L9103
May need some work to get working from inside mock:
# ./FreeCAD -t 0
FreeCAD
Thanks Igor, I'll update both ASAP.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 17:41 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:01 PM Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> > Not really a big deal but %build_make has been available for quite
> > a while. I noticed a few of my packages still supply
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:01 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Not really a big deal but %build_make has been available for quite a while. I
> noticed a few of my packages still supply _smp_mflags manually.
Recently, one of my packages switched to meson and while searching
through our documentation, I
W dniu wto, 19.05.2020 o godzinie 17∶50 +0200, użytkownik Dan Horák
napisał:
> [..]
>
> I think Richard is rather looking for OpenQA for testing the GUI
> unless
> the FreeCAD functionality can be also tested thru some command line /
> text mode interface.
>
>
"FreeCAD -t 0" performs approx 470
On 21. 05. 20 12:43, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 21. 05. 20 9:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Gwyn,
we are about to start rebuilding in Koji for Python 3.9 this or next week.
In Copr, we built NumPy 1.19 rc1 from dist git and it causes some friction. I
wonder whether you'd be OK to revert the
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 7:59 AM Dominique Martinet
wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote on Mon, May 18, 2020:
> > > Seems to work for me:
> >
> > Don't know what's wrong then...
>
> I went back and re-read your first mail, it is possible it doesn't work
> on one of your own projects?
> I'm not sure how
Not really a big deal but %build_make has been available for quite a while.
I noticed a few of my packages still supply _smp_mflags manually.
Is this worth a script and automatic BZ? Probably not, but I think there is
an intrinsic value to consistency.
Thanks,
Richard
Context:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837809#c28
https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2020/03/21/new-nbdkit-remote-tmpfs-tmpdisk-plugin/
http://libguestfs.org/nbdkit-tmpdisk-plugin.1.html
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:40 PM James Antill wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
> meeting Thursday at 2020-05-21 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
> irc.freenode.net.
[snip]
> = New Issues =
>
> #topic #982 Font packaging stopped working in rawhide/F33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838657
Bug ID: 1838657
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.43 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Agreed. That a lot of Python is such in 2.7 land I know and understand well
and it's not something Fedora can fix without boiling an ocean or two.
Python 3.x is good but not compelling for many codebases. Maintainership
effort for many projects has dwindled, tech debt must now be paid in one
big
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:04 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Practically, this means that your build will wait longer to find a builder
> available and as a result the whole build process will feel slower. The
> builds per say should not be impacted though.
>
> As a result, if you know today that you
On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 08:49, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:47 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Perhaps, but they are still too cumbersome for the average packager.
> > So I would have to create a module for Python 3.7, python-pyside2, and
> freecad, correct?
>
> Maybe Fedora
The Fedora Packaging Committee has some open seats and is accepting
submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC.
The FPC would like to thank Orion Poplawski, and Jonathan Wakely for
their service.
This position involves not only reviewing Packaging Guideline drafts
submitted to
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:47 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> Perhaps, but they are still too cumbersome for the average packager.
> So I would have to create a module for Python 3.7, python-pyside2, and
> freecad, correct?
Maybe Fedora needs parallel installable "python" and "python-next" stacks?
kchildlock orphaned.
It is for KDE4 and has dead upstream.
--
Best regards,
Vasiliy Glazov
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 7:14 AM Tom Callaway wrote:
> If your package has a tex file that it uses to generate documentation, and
> that tex file says \usepackage{foo}, then your package needs to have:
>
> BuildRequires: tex(foo.sty)
>
> The only exception to that is for packages which include
Thank you. It seems that it was working previously by accident :)
Have a nice day.
Lumír
On 5/21/20 2:13 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
If your package has a tex file that it uses to generate documentation,
and that tex file says \usepackage{foo}, then your package needs to have:
BuildRequires:
If your package has a tex file that it uses to generate documentation, and
that tex file says \usepackage{foo}, then your package needs to have:
BuildRequires: tex(foo.sty)
The only exception to that is for packages which include .sty files,
obviously, if the \usepackage dependency is met within
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default@uefi:
Used mem changed from 147 MiB to 171 MiB
System load changed from 0.08 to 0.31
Peak task count changed from 103 to 114
Previous test data:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 09:25 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello Gwyn,
>
> we are about to start rebuilding in Koji for Python 3.9 this or next
> week.
>
> In Copr, we built NumPy 1.19 rc1 from dist git and it causes some
> friction. I
> wonder
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 33 RC 20200521.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
Hello.
I am trying to investigate a new problem in ipython that is probably
related to the update of texlive:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838474
ipython uses latex to generate png images of tex formulas. Internally it
calls latex and dvipng commands.
Right now, I have a
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:48 AM Przemo Firszt wrote:
>
> I think it's time for me to activate.. My name is Przemo, I'm long time
> redhat/PLD/fedora user with some experience in packaging. debugging,
> etc. I keep building FreeCAD since fedora 20, I also maintain FreeCAD
> nightly builds on COPR
Hi,
W dniu wto, 19.05.2020 o godzinie 07∶03 -0500, użytkownik Richard Shaw
napisał:
> So I get the whole Fedora first, but...
>
> Backstory:
>
> FreeCAD has been in a terrible state in Fedora for a couple of years
> now and I've nearly given up on trying to maintain the package a few
> times
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 602207 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/602207
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
On 21. 05. 20 9:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Gwyn,
we are about to start rebuilding in Koji for Python 3.9 this or next week.
In Copr, we built NumPy 1.19 rc1 from dist git and it causes some friction. I
wonder whether you'd be OK to revert the commits and wait until the rebuilt is
done?
On Thu, May 21, 2020 09:16:40 -, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> I've written blog posts about packaging and gave a talk about it on a
> local Linux group, so I'd be glad to participate in workshops or some
> other initiative.
>
> One idea that comes to my mind right now is - how about making a video
>
On Thu, May 21, 2020 11:47:43 +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 09:52 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > The packaging team is generally quite stretched, and we frankly need
> > more people helping us out.
> >
> >
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello.
Kevin and Smooge, you are CCed in case you have some concerns regarding the data
centre move.
Jitka and Zuzka, you are CCed because you plan mini mass rebuilds of your own
(Perl and Node.js).
Ben, you are CCed because I considered it a good idea.
Python 3.9.0b1 was released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 09:52 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The packaging team is generally quite stretched, and we frankly need
> more people helping us out.
>
> The main issue with newcomers taking on packaging is that the
> learning
>
On 5/20/20 9:36 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 05:22:42AM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
I think I owe some in the Fedora project an apology.
Hi Ty. Thank you for this. When we're passionate about something, it's easy
to get frustrated and upset, and easy for that to get out of
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 05:56:23PM +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> I think you might have cache of buildroot which was populated using BDB
> backend, so I guess if you clean mock caches, the problem should go
> away.
Thanks, the issue went away
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:17 AM Artur Iwicki
wrote:
> I've written blog posts about packaging and gave a talk about it on a
> local Linux group, so I'd be glad to participate in workshops or some other
> initiative.
>
> One idea that comes to my mind right now is - how about making a video
>
I've written blog posts about packaging and gave a talk about it on a local
Linux group, so I'd be glad to participate in workshops or some other
initiative.
One idea that comes to my mind right now is - how about making a video
tutorial? While I personally dislike those and prefer text, I
Hi, all,
if you use gating.yaml to configure gating[1], please be aware that
test names staring with "org.centos.prod.ci.pipeline" are now
deprecated.
New name for the dist-git test is
fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional.
We plan to switch off sending messages for old test names on
Hi folks,
The packaging team is generally quite stretched, and we frankly need
more people helping us out.
The main issue with newcomers taking on packaging is that the learning
curve here is much more technical then a lot of other areas in Fedora.
So, while it is still expected that folks read
Le mercredi 20 mai 2020 à 22:18 +0200, Miro Hrončok a écrit :
>
> We could have parallel installable multiple Python version stacks
> w/out Modularity just fine. The "only little problem" is we hardly
> have the enough maintainers to maintain the 3k+ existing Python
> packages.
BTW, that’s not a
Hello Gwyn,
we are about to start rebuilding in Koji for Python 3.9 this or next week.
In Copr, we built NumPy 1.19 rc1 from dist git and it causes some friction. I
wonder whether you'd be OK to revert the commits and wait until the rebuilt is
done? The new version was not built in rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838194
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 01:49 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> The Fedora Packaging Committee has some open seats and is accepting
> submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC.
>
> The FPC would like to thank Orion Poplawski, and
64 matches
Mail list logo
