Hi,
I'm not sure who is maintaining the Fedora shim pkg, if none of you,
could you suggest who is the right person to ping.
The bug below is not fixed yet for long time, can we get an update?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651016
Thanks
Dave
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/06/19/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.3-20200618gitc20cb67.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842892
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842176
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844899
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842698
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842524
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842698
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844899
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842176
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Fedora!
I'm a long-time linux-user, meshnet participant, and a volunteer
contributor with the GNU:NET project. Gnunet is a metadata-protecting,
and decentralized networking suite: https://gnunet.org
I'm working to package Gnunet for Fedora,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 5:51 PM clime wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 15:25, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:05 AM Igor Raits
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA512
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 08:44 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 15:25, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:05 AM Igor Raits
> wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 08:44 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Hello Fedora Community!
> >
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > > I am a
On Monday, June 15, 2020 5:24:54 PM MST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> > == Summary ==
> > All retired packages are obsoleted by `fedora-retired-packages`.
> >
> > == Owner ==
> > * Name: [[User:msuchy| Miroslav Suchý]]
> > * Email: msu...@redhat.com
>
>
> Absolute -1!
>
> IMHO,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:34 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> The issues I've seen so far affect both Fedora and RHEL, but have gotten a bit
> better in Fedora. For example, a major concern that has been much worse in
> Fedora than RHEL, for obvious reasons:
>
> One month you can do a fresh
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/51167
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 1:27 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> I don't think burst-to-cloud means we only burst to a single cloud.
> That seems like a great way to just lock into that cloud with no
> flexibility. Rather, I would look at it as a hybrid cloud opportunity
> and use AWS, or the IBM cloud that
On Thursday, June 18, 2020 12:22:08 PM MST Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 1:59 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, June 18, 2020 6:24:46 AM MST Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > > The base requirement is that the UX remain largely the same. As I
> > > said, from a
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:39 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:31 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Personally, I have long wanted burst-to-cloud or the ability for
> > others to donate hosts to the Fedora build system without having to
> > physically ship hardware. Koji is somewhat
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 1:59 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 18, 2020 6:24:46 AM MST Josh Boyer wrote:
> > The base requirement is that the UX remain largely the same. As I
> > said, from a RHEL perspective, we need RHEL 8 and RHEL 9 to have
> > commonality so that our
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:51 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:30 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jared K. Smith
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ben
Hi,
We're having some discussions in the OpenVPN community in regards to the
pkcs11-helper library and which version to bundle in our Windows builds. We
pull the pkcs11-helper-rfc7512.patch from the Fedora builds, as we need that
functionality it provides.
During these discussions we see that
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:31 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> Personally, I have long wanted burst-to-cloud or the ability for
> others to donate hosts to the Fedora build system without having to
> physically ship hardware. Koji is somewhat limited in that regard.
> Maybe developing a shim layer and
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2020, 16:34 +0200 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar:
> A new version of gpsd is ready to be build in rawhide. This is a
> second attempt. It now bumps the libgps soname. Per repoquery the
> following packages have a dependency on libgps and will need a
> rebuild:
>
> collectd
>
On Thursday, June 18, 2020 6:24:46 AM MST Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:05 AM Igor Raits
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 08:44 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Fedora Community!
> >
> >
> >
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:30:58PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
...snip...
> > However, I am concerned that as ELN develops further, we are likely to
> > be even more starved for build resources than we have been previously.
> > Modules are huge
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:30 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jared K. Smith
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
> > >>
> > >> So... this is a lot of node.js packages,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:29 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 18. 06. 20 15:24, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> Basically this email just says "We decided for Modularity in RHEL 9 and
> >> we would like to do it in Fedora Infrastructure first".
> > Mostly, yes. We were told there was ambiguity on whether
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 07:55:21AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> These updates, along with a couple of others I submitted 12h ago, just
> appeared in my local mirror. Bodhi still shows everything as
> transitioning from pending to testing and I never got a notification
> about them having
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:45 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > Hello Fedora Community!
> >
> > I am a long-time Fedora Community member, and may be familiar to many
> > through previous FESCo or devel list discussions and passionate
> > debates.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 09:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:45 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> However, I am concerned that as ELN develops further, we are likely to
> be even more starved for build resources than we have been previously.
> Modules are huge build chains that
Hi,
Guideline page needing clarification:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging
Explanation
in this wiki page is not clear that on EPEL8 we don't need anymore the
scriptlets of Icon Cache, mimeinfo and Desktop databases
Thank you
--
Sérgio M. B.
Done for direwolf.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2020, 16:34 +0200 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar:
> A new version of gpsd is ready to be build in rawhide. This is a
> second attempt. It now bumps the libgps soname. Per repoquery the
> following packages have a dependency on libgps and will need a
> rebuild:
>
> collectd
>
A new version of gpsd is ready to be build in rawhide. This is a
second attempt. It now bumps the libgps soname. Per repoquery the
following packages have a dependency on libgps and will need a
rebuild:
collectd
direwolf
foxtrotgps
marble
plasma-workspace
qlandkartegt
vfrnav
viking
Some packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818509
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846490
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-61103921dc has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-61103921dc has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-61103921dc has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846493
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-61103921dc has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846147
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-61103921dc has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846491
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-61103921dc has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846490
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846491
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846493
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846147
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846491
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0236944568 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0236944568
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846490
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0236944568 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0236944568
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846493
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0236944568 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0236944568
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846147
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #15 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846490
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846491
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846493
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 09:24 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:05 AM Igor Raits
> wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 08:44 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Hello Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846493
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846491
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7b41ac8c13 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846490
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7b41ac8c13 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846147
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7b41ac8c13 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
On 18. 06. 20 15:24, Josh Boyer wrote:
Basically this email just says "We decided for Modularity in RHEL 9 and
we would like to do it in Fedora Infrastructure first".
Mostly, yes. We were told there was ambiguity on whether modularity
would be used in RHEL 9 or not. Very clearly it will, so I
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:45 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> Hello Fedora Community!
>
> I am a long-time Fedora Community member, and may be familiar to many
> through previous FESCo or devel list discussions and passionate
> debates. However I write to you today with a different community hat
> on,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:05 AM Igor Raits
wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 08:44 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Hello Fedora Community!
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> > I am a long-time Fedora Community member, and may be familiar to many
> > through
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847506
Bill Pemberton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 08:44 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hello Fedora Community!
Hi Josh,
> I am a long-time Fedora Community member, and may be familiar to many
> through previous FESCo or devel list discussions and passionate
> debates. However I
Hello Fedora Community!
I am a long-time Fedora Community member, and may be familiar to many
through previous FESCo or devel list discussions and passionate
debates. However I write to you today with a different community hat
on, as a lead Architect for Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The RHEL
Hi Fedorans,
as translation coordinator, I have to track issues opened in many
upstream project.
For example, our migration from Zanata to Weblate:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_Move_to_Weblate
The issue I see: wiki isn't so convenient for this because it provides
no automatic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842881
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25820
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848457
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25819
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848458
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25818
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848459
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25817
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848458
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1848459
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848459
Bug ID: 1848459
Summary: Add perl-IO-Interactive to EPEL7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: ASSIGNED
Component: perl-IO-Interactive
Keywords: FutureFeature
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848458
Bug ID: 1848458
Summary: Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet to EPEL7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: ASSIGNED
Component: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848457
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1848458
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842881
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1848457
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848457
Bug ID: 1848457
Summary: Add perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple to EPEL7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: ASSIGNED
Component: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple
Keywords:
Hi All,
Due to a personal conflict the CPE PO Office Hours is cancelled today on
#fedora-meeting-1 @ 1300 UTC.
As Fedocal is down due to the datacentre move I am unable to remove the
slot, so please disregard the calendar meeting today.
The office hours will resume next week as scheduled and I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846934
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-8.54 is|perl-Mojolicious-8.55 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842881
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
Hello, I've opened this PR some time ago:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/15
Who's the best person to ask for a review?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
epel-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847730
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842881
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
Net-Amazon-S3-0.89 tests fail because RHEL's perl-Test-Deep-0.110 is too old to
provide obj_isa(). I will report it to the upstream and write a work around.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847730
Bug 1847730 depends on bug 1848027, which changed state.
Bug 1848027 Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Abstract-Classic - Generate SQL
from Perl data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848027
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848198
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848088
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835353
Yadnyawalk Tale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847803
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842892
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ea010f3299 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ea010f3299
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842892
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
97 matches
Mail list logo
