On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 8:03:03 AM MST David Tardon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 23:46 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > On Monday, August 31, 2020 11:24:57 PM MST David Tardon wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 00:08 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > >
> > >
>
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/09/03/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200902gite8f0692.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 6:27:22 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:09 pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> > As for crond and atd, I think we can keep them installed by default,
> > but inactive. I.e. make them socket activated or path activated, so
> >
On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 6:09:26 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 09:27:33PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > These are based on Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-20200828.n.0.iso
> > in a VM. The numbers are different on bare metal but
Hi all,
Some exciting updates re: Lua packaging
TL;DR we want to simplify the Lua packaging experience as much as
possible, across both Fedora and RHEL.
Some background:
- before RHEL 7, the Lua RPM does not provide "lua(abi) = MAJ.MIN" so a
package that ships Lua modules has to declare this to
Hi packagers,
I'm pleased to announce that there's a new mock/mock-core-configs release:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-2.5
This is rather a small release, so shortly, from the most interesting
changes -- there's a new opt-in plugin for `rpm --showrc`
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 14:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> I think playground might be fixable/made of use without too much
> work...
> * adjust fedpkg to stop requesting playground branches always/only
> request them on explicit ask
> * change the inheritence in koji so it inherits from epel8
>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 02:33:05PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I did close the infra ticket:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9271
> Anyhow, happy testing.
Thanks Kevin!
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list
I solved the previous error about macros expanded in comments, and now
the build fails for other strange reasons.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/germano/kernel_204253_comment_14_patch/build/1616496/
By the way by commenting my patch on spec file, the kernel builds
successfully
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200830.0):
ID: 653697 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653697
Old failures (same
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 7/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2020-09-03 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2020-09-03 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2020-09-03
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 12:08:58PM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> HI all,
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:36 pm, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 02:25:25PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > There's a FBR (freeze break request) to patch all the builders to
> > > fix
> > > this
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 08:05:14AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 7:08 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 09:43, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:44 AM kevin wrote:
> >> >
> >>
> >> > > Thoughts?
> >> >
> >> > Well,
I'm doing a rebuild of the OCaml-related packages in F33 to move from
OCaml 4.11.0 prerelease to OCaml 4.11.1 because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870368#c26
"A serious bug has been discovered last week in OCaml 4.11.0:
explicit polymorphic annotations are checked too
HI all,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:36 pm, Matthew Miller
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 02:25:25PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
There's a FBR (freeze break request) to patch all the builders to
fix
this problem[1], but I don't know if it has been applied yet.
[1]:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 02:25:25PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> There's a FBR (freeze break request) to patch all the builders to fix
> this problem[1], but I don't know if it has been applied yet.
>
> [1]:
>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:13:21PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Bohdan, could you build the same image in several configurations (the most
> likely candidates) and share them with us? (We can host them in our QA
> fedorapeople space, if needed). That would allow interested parties to test
> and
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:23 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:52:25PM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> > This is just very disappointing [3]. Unless there is a huge delay in
> > the beta timeline due to *actual* blockers, we've got no beta to
> > test since this is 1-2 weeks
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:52:25PM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> This is just very disappointing [3]. Unless there is a huge delay in
> the beta timeline due to *actual* blockers, we've got no beta to
> test since this is 1-2 weeks out due to further testing needed [2].
> So, unless this minor
On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 21:27 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These are based on Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-20200828.n.0.iso
> in a VM. The numbers are different on bare metal but correlate.
>
> The only standout is rngd.service. That's a pretty big single hit,
> percentage wise. And I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-3fde92c7b3 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
Vít Ondruch writes:
> Hi Robbie,
>
> I wonder if you had some intentions with the packages,
If you're asking if I plan to take them, I do not. They have been
orphaned, so anyone interested can pick them up. (They should refer to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-4a8ebd72d4 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
Hello,
On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 23:46 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Monday, August 31, 2020 11:24:57 PM MST David Tardon wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 00:08 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >
> > > On Saturday, August 29, 2020 3:36:33 PM MST Colin Walters wrote:
> > >
> > > >
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
749 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
489 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b
bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7
198
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
21 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c2936180ed
ansible-2.9.12-1.el8
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-96c4037065
ark-19.12.2-3.el8
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869726
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Getopt-Long-2.52-1.fc3 |perl-Getopt-Long-2.52-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 33/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200901.n.0):
ID: 653087 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653087
ID: 653090 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-02/fesco.2020-09-02-14.01.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-02/fesco.2020-09-02-14.01.txt
Log:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200901.0):
ID: 653316 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:43 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 02. 09. 20 v 15:18 Greg Hellings napsal(a):
>
> Vit, et al,
>
> My professional need for rubygems ended a while back, and I have no
> personal investment into Ruby.
>
>
> That is perfectly fine.
>
>
> So I would prefer not to take on
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:50 pm, Nico Kadel-Garcia
wrote:
And oh, "files" always comes first because local config files should
always take priority over upstream network based services.
Zbigniew wound up moving files first in the end, but his justification
for putting resolve first is here:
Dne 02. 09. 20 v 15:18 Greg Hellings napsal(a):
> Vit, et al,
>
> My professional need for rubygems ended a while back, and I have no
> personal investment into Ruby.
That is perfectly fine.
> So I would prefer not to take on more Ruby packages as I don't pay
> much attention to the space.
OLD: Fedora-33-20200901.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200902.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 10
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:235.88 KiB
Size
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 00:12:34 -0600,
Chris Murphy wrote:
No user creation in Workstation Live, for a long time. First user is
created by GNOME Initial Setup. Root user is not enabled.
I was using the XFCE spin, so that might be different.
___
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:09 pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
As for crond and atd, I think we can keep them installed by default,
but inactive. I.e. make them socket activated or path activated, so
that
they are only started if people install actual crontabs or run at.
I don't think
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
Since every screen contains just a couple of things, the "basic
functionality test" as you phrased it seems to cover essentially
everything that is present in there, with one arguable exception of
the Enterprise Login functionality. Do you
Vit, et al,
My professional need for rubygems ended a while back, and I have no
personal investment into Ruby. So I would prefer not to take on more Ruby
packages as I don't pay much attention to the space.
--Greg
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:38 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi Robbie,
>
> I wonder if
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 09:27:33PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These are based on Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-20200828.n.0.iso
> in a VM. The numbers are different on bare metal but correlate.
>
> The only standout is rngd.service. That's a pretty big single hit,
> percentage
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:17:49AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >> Big Brother will be happy. :-)
> > >
> > > Sure, those two companies will be thrilled, I'm sure. This is a huge
> > > disservice to our users. Why in the world does systemd try to force DNS
> > > servers when none are
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:50:46AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I don't think the DHCP server for the QEMU VMs is supplying a domain.
> However, Network Manager
> will add a "search" option to resolv.conf when "hostname" returns a FQDN.
Ed opened
OpenImageIO 2.2.6.1 was released yesterday. There are no API changes so
simple rebuilds should be sufficient for all dependent packages.
The builds will be done in a side-tag for Rawhide. I'd like to update f33
as well unless there's a good reason not to, dependent package maintainers
CC'd.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:05 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 01. 09. 20 v 19:54 Tom Hughes via devel napsal(a):
> > On 01/09/2020 18:29, kevin wrote:
> >
> >> Just to make sure folks know, the retrace server being down is not this
> >> teams fault, it's ours (infrastructure). We planned to just
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:24 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup
> is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release
> criterion, but surely we don't want to release with a broken initial
> setup experience.
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Dne 01. 09. 20 v 19:54 Tom Hughes via devel napsal(a):
> On 01/09/2020 18:29, kevin wrote:
>
>> Just to make sure folks know, the retrace server being down is not this
>> teams fault, it's ours (infrastructure). We planned to just have it down
>> for a week or less when moving it to RDU, but it
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200901.0):
ID: 652894 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hi Robbie,
I wonder if you had some intentions with the packages, be cause at lest
the 3 down bellow looks to be required by other packages and they are
now in danger of being removed from Fedora.
Adding on CC Pavel, Dan and Greg who might be interested in some of them.
Vít
Dne 01. 09. 20 v
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-4a8ebd72d4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4a8ebd72d4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-b10d1c977e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b10d1c977e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-3fde92c7b3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3fde92c7b3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
* John M. Harris, Jr.:
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 5:19:15 AM MST Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * John M. Harris, Jr.:
>>
>>
>> > Sure, those two companies will be thrilled, I'm sure. This is a huge
>> > disservice to our users. Why in the world does systemd try to force DNS
>> > servers when
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 11:11 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 22:09:57 -0600,
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:16 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >>
> >
> >You're using net installer? The Live doesn't have user configuration
> >in the installer.
>
> I did
57 matches
Mail list logo
