On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:30 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 1:37 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> But if you've got a snapshot once per day, times ten days, and this kind of
>> aggressive search function touching every file? Maybe an extra 1-2G of
>> metadata being pinned
>
>
> I
Hi,
Upstream has clarified their license as they embed some Knronos/EGL
specifications under a different license.
Thus, the package's license has changed from MIT to MIT and ASL 2.0.
--
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876258
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876124
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-2170b9043a has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 12/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200906.n.0):
ID:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876156
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-834903d60a has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876273
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0326297eb8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875908
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876160
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f13a738c65 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:34:05PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> + Communication: repurposing the Fedora Btrfs wiki as a landing page
> is a work-in-progress
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Btrfs
I prefer end-user documentation to not be in the wiki, because it's an easy
click away to a lot of
+ F33 Btrfs By Default Test Week has concluded
Test results page
https://testdays.fedorainfracloud.org/events/92
Perhaps the most significant issue discovered is something of an edge
case. The installer has performance issues when it encounters a Btrfs
file system with many snapshots (500+ in
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 07:44, Dhanesh B. Sabane
wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I've been away from all Fedora activities for quite some time and I
> don't see a return anytime soon. There are 6 Python packages which are
> maintained by me and I'd like to hand them over. Following is the list
> of
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 2:24 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 8:17 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 12:12 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> > > Overall I find the criterion reasonable and useful and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876160
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-e7d27e09b4 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876156
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-84ea84a57f has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1af9888c22
golang-1.15-1.el6
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-972f57ea6d
drupal7-7.72-1.el6
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876124
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876160
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876273
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876156
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843866
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Mango-1.30-8.fc33 |perl-Mango-1.30-8.fc33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870778
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-80a523b54f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870769
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870763
Bug 1870763 depends on bug 1870769, which changed state.
Bug 1870769 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Text-RecordParser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870769
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870775
Bug 1870775 depends on bug 1870776, which changed state.
Bug 1870776 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870776
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870757
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870766
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870779
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870776
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870775
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870752
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870745
Bug 1870745 depends on bug 1870748, which changed state.
Bug 1870748 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-C3-Componentised
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870748
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870754
Bug 1870754 depends on bug 1870766, which changed state.
Bug 1870766 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Devel-ArgNames
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870766
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870745
Bug 1870745 depends on bug 1870747, which changed state.
Bug 1870747 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-Accessor-Grouped
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870747
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870745
Bug 1870745 depends on bug 1870757, which changed state.
Bug 1870757 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870757
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870748
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870747
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870739
Bug 1870739 depends on bug 1870741, which changed state.
Bug 1870741 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-AnyEvent-CacheDNS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870741
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870745
Bug 1870745 depends on bug 1870752, which changed state.
Bug 1870752 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Context-Preserve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870752
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870765
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870746
Bug 1870746 depends on bug 1870765, which changed state.
Bug 1870765 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Directory-Scratch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870765
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870741
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870739
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Hello Kamil,
> Bohdan, could you build the same image in several configurations (the
most likely candidates) and share them with us? (We can host them in our
QA fedorapeople space, if needed). That would allow interested parties
to test and benchmark the experience themselves.
I'll provide
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200906.0):
ID: 657523 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/657523
Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64)
Installed system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439151
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716324
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com
Hello everyone,
I'd like to announce a new project of the QA team and an extension of the
BlockerBugs App [1]. The blocker and freeze exception proposals can now not
only be discussed during regular blocker review meetings [2], but also at
any time through discussion tickets hosted on Pagure [3].
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200906.n.0):
ID: 657220 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/657220
ID: 657266 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 19:15 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 1:22:26 PM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup
> > is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release
> >
Hi all,
The new version of libcbor package will arrive soon and there are going to be
some changes.
SONAME change: "libcbor.so.0" to "libcbor.so.0.7" (More info:
https://github.com/PJK/libcbor/issues/52)
Rename cbor_ctrl_is_bool to cbor_get_bool (More info:
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64)
ID: 657453 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/657453
ID: 657459 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL:
OLD: Fedora-33-20200906.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200907.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 8:30 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 1:37 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> But if you've got a snapshot once per day, times ten days, and this kind of
>> aggressive search function touching every file? Maybe an extra 1-2G of
>> metadata being pinned
>
>
> I
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 1:37 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> But if you've got a snapshot once per day, times ten days, and this kind
> of aggressive search function touching every file? Maybe an extra 1-2G of
> metadata being pinned
>
I don't follow. If you have one master copy and 10 snapshots, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876124
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-e6c820fbab has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e6c820fbab
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876124
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hey Pruthvi,
> I am looking for packages to maintain and this would help a lot.
>
Do let me know the package that you'd like to maintain and I'll add you as a
co-maintainer for it.
Have a good one!
Cheers!
Dhanesh Sabane
___
devel mailing list --
Hello Lumir,
> I'd like to maintain:
>
> python-first
> python-pipdeptree
> python-pipreqs
> python-yarg
>
> These are dependencies of pipenv we (@python-sig) maintain so please add
> me as an admin and this group as co-maintainer.
>
I've added you as admin and @python-sig as committer for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876124
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876258
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-c8acfb9a5f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c8acfb9a5f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 1:02 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Is it possible to include a noarch package only in some of the composes?
>
> The background is that I added glibc-headers-x86.noarch to deal with a
> conflict between inconsistent composes (glibc-headers.i686 was sometimes
> in the x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876160
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-aafebc3e82 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-aafebc3e82
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876160
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f13a738c65 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f13a738c65
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876160
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Is it possible to include a noarch package only in some of the composes?
The background is that I added glibc-headers-x86.noarch to deal with a
conflict between inconsistent composes (glibc-headers.i686 was sometimes
in the x86_64 compose, sometimes it was not). glibc-headers-x86.noarch
is
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200906.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200907.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 51
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 64.95 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876156
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-84ea84a57f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-84ea84a57f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876156
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-834903d60a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-834903d60a
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876156
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876258
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876156
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876273
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perltidy-20200907-1.fc34
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876273
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876273
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876460
Bug ID: 1876460
Summary: perl-Event-Lib FTBFS in F33 and Rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: 33
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Event-Lib
Assignee: kwiz...@gmail.com
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200905.0):
ID: 656801 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876258
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875908
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-c70c3b122e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c70c3b122e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875908
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 8:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 12:12 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Overall I find the criterion reasonable and useful and I'm +1 to
> > > incorporating it. Its current phrasing seems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875908
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807857
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
Doc Type|---
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Hi Till,
please install firefox-x11 package and use Firefox X11 to test if it's
caused by Wayland backend.
Also please file a new bug at #BZ so it can be diagnosed more, i.e.
test Mozilla binaries, disable extensions etc..
Thanks,
Martin
On 9/5/20 2:50 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
Hi all,
Hey,
I am looking for packages to maintain and this would help a lot.
Thanks,
Pruthvi.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020, 11:14 Dhanesh B. Sabane wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I've been away from all Fedora activities for quite some time and I
> don't see a return anytime soon. There are 6 Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876378
Bug ID: 1876378
Summary: perl-Mail-DKIM-1.20200907 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-DKIM
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
We have carefully selected high-class and professional teachers of the Quran.
Our teachers are proficient receptors to encourage students to recite well and
to maintain their interest.
Our experience with students enables us to determine the fastest and most
effective teaching methods that,
On 6/9/20 00:09, Till Hofmann wrote:
>
>
> On 9/5/20 3:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm having a weird problem with Bugzilla: Whenever I want to close an
>>> issue and I click on the reason menu
Hello.
I'd like to maintain:
python-first
python-pipdeptree
python-pipreqs
python-yarg
These are dependencies of pipenv we (@python-sig) maintain so please add
me as an admin and this group as co-maintainer.
Have a nice day.
Lumír
On 9/7/20 7:43 AM, Dhanesh B. Sabane wrote:
Hello folks!
91 matches
Mail list logo
