Copr package build fails on python-nocaselist package

Hi, I requested review of the proposed package in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880953 Andy > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Andreas R Maier > Subject: Fwd: Copr package build fails on python-nocaselist package > Date:

[EPEL-devel] EPEL Playground - Policy and Plans

EPEL playground (currently only for epel8) has recently changed it's overall policy. That new policy can be found here. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Playground The biggest policy change is that epel-playground is not meant to be a stand-alone repository. If you use epel-playground, you

Fedora-33-20200921.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200920.n.0): ID: 673583 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/673583 Old failures (same test failed in

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Miro Hrončok writes: > winetricksorphan, raphgro, tc010 weeks ago Any particular reason why winetricks got orphaned? Cheers, Dan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Fedora 33 - ssh clients - drop of PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=ssh-rsa

On Monday, September 21, 2020 6:30:47 PM WEST Ankur Sinha wrote: > I just updated to F33, and now I think I get the same issue with > BitBucket.org: > > $ ssh -Tv g...@bitbucket.org > ... > send_pubkey_test: no mutual signature algorithm > > It works if I use: > > $ ssh -Tv

Fedora 33 compose report: 20200921.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-33-20200920.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20200921.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Kubernetes Development SIG

I would like to be part too :) - Breno On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 11:46, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 20:25:18 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 7:15 PM Leonardo Rossetti > wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I would like to present a

Re: Conflicting build-ids in chromium and chromium-freeworld

On 2020-09-21 12:08, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2020-09-21 at 08:55 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> On 9/21/20 12:25 AM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: >>> Hi. There is an ongoing problem with conflicting build-ids in chromium >>> and chromium-freeworld [1][2]: Error: Transaction

System no longer distributes load to multiple cores for long running task

Hi, It's been a while (6 months?) since I ran a python program that uses a 100% cpu core for hours. The last time I ran it, the task would migrate from core to core to core, every second or so. I could see it doing so in the various tops. Now, it runs on only one core, and doesn't move. This

Re: Fedora 33 - ssh clients - drop of PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=ssh-rsa

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 19:11:29 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > After upgrade of one of my servers to F33, I noticed that I can not ssh to > one of my other servers running Debian 9 system (relatively freshly EOLed, > I need to do something about it). On F33 I always need to: > > $ ssh

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life >

Re: Fedora EOL wrt new dist-git branches (and my confusion)

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 1:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Tangent nit-pick... Once an update has been created for a branch, why not > > at least allow it to go to stable? Seeing my packages stuck in testing > for > > eternity bothers my OCD until I push enough updates I don't see it > anymore. > >

Fedora-IoT-34-20200921.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200920.0): ID: 673196 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL:

Orphaning "vtun"

The functionality offered by the vtun package has been completely subsumed by openssh, since at least with version 8.0. I've switched to using openssh, and no longer have the need and resources to take care of vtun. Free to a good home, or ready for retirement. Thanks, --Gabriel

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0214580ca4 mbedtls-2.16.8-1.el8 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c5ced83bcc seamonkey-2.53.4-1.el8 3

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 768 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 508 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7 15

[Bug 1880857] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-64dc185f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

[Bug 1880859] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880859 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a5b6a25059 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

[Bug 1880857] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: [HEADS-UP] libevent 2.1.12 with a soname bump is coming to Rawhide

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:17 AM Ondřej Lysoněk wrote: > > Initial set: > - avahi - needs to be bootstrapped > - packages that I haven't been able to rebuild: > - community-mysql, libreswan, perl-Event-Lib, sems > - other: addrwatch, ccnet, coturn, groonga, ladvd, libasr, > libverto, links,

[Bug 1880859] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880859 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1880850] perl-libwww-perl-6.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880850 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8d45246086 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8d45246086 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1880850] perl-libwww-perl-6.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880850 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-22f40ebe4d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-22f40ebe4d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1880850] perl-libwww-perl-6.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880850 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-b6ef4e92cc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b6ef4e92cc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1880850] perl-libwww-perl-6.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880850 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1880850] perl-libwww-perl-6.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880850 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Logs from Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 21st September

Hello everyone, Here are the logs from today's meeting. The next meeting will be at the same time in 2 weeks time, and will be chaired by @purusharths. === #fedora-neuro: NeuroFedora - 2020-09-21 === Meeting started by

Re: In which order does ELN build packages, what build root is it using?

On 21. 09. 20 15:40, Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi, I couldn't build elfutils because of an annobin bug that showed up on ppc64le. Nick was nice enough to fix it and push a new annobin version: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c78fce452e So I could build elfutils again:

Re: Fedora 33 - ssh clients - drop of PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=ssh-rsa

On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 16:03, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Sunday, September 20, 2020 8:52:21 PM CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 07:11:29PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > After upgrade of one of my servers to F33, I noticed that I can not > ssh to > > > one of my other

In which order does ELN build packages, what build root is it using?

Hi, I couldn't build elfutils because of an annobin bug that showed up on ppc64le. Nick was nice enough to fix it and push a new annobin version: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c78fce452e So I could build elfutils again:

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 9:05 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 21.09.2020 14:30, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Do you > > seriously think that the bugs there won't get fixed? Some of them > > already *have* been fixed in Plasma 5.19. > > A very annoying bug[1] with broken keyboard layout switcher

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Dne 21. 09. 20 v 14:39 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper > reason: >

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On 21.09.2020 14:30, Neal Gompa wrote: > Do you > seriously think that the bugs there won't get fixed? Some of them > already *have* been fixed in Plasma 5.19. A very annoying bug[1] with broken keyboard layout switcher must be a blocker. Not everyone here lives in English-speaking countries.

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 8:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 21.09.2020 13:19, Neal Gompa wrote: > > KDE upstream has a > > specific "goal" to get Wayland support to first-class status: > > https://community.kde.org/Goals/Wayland > > https://community.kde.org/Plasma/Wayland_Showstoppers

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On 21.09.2020 13:19, Neal Gompa wrote: > KDE upstream has a > specific "goal" to get Wayland support to first-class status: > https://community.kde.org/Goals/Wayland https://community.kde.org/Plasma/Wayland_Showstoppers -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: protobuf (3.13) update is coming to rawhide

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:23:40AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > I will do a protobuf update in rawhide which comes, as always, with a > new SO version. > > Before starting the builds in rawhide I will try it out first in COPR > and once that is done I will do the builds in rawhide in a side tag.

Re: Side tag rebuilds an ELN

* Aleksandra Fedorova: > Hi, Florian, > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:35 AM Florian Weimer wrote: >> >> How do side tag rebuilds and ELN interact? If we do a complicated >> synchronous package update in a side tag, will ELN track this closely? >> Or will someone have to redo the same steps in

Re: Side tag rebuilds an ELN

Hi, Florian, On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:35 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > How do side tag rebuilds and ELN interact? If we do a complicated > synchronous package update in a side tag, will ELN track this closely? > Or will someone have to redo the same steps in ELN manually? For now we react on

Re: Conflicting build-ids in chromium and chromium-freeworld

Le lun. 21 sept. 2020 à 12:08, Mark Wielaard a écrit : > > Hi, > > On Mon, 2020-09-21 at 08:55 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 9/21/20 12:25 AM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > > > Hi. There is an ongoing problem with conflicting build-ids in chromium > > > and chromium-freeworld [1][2]: > > >

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 7:11 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:22 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Thursday, September 10, 2020 6:00:09 PM CEST Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:58 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > > Might be interesting to try logging in as

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:22 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Thursday, September 10, 2020 6:00:09 PM CEST Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:58 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > Might be interesting to try logging in as a new user to see if some older > > > kde settings are messing

Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 8/181 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200921.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 21st September

Hi everyone, A quick reminder of today's NeuroFedora SIG meeting. Please see below for details. I hope to see you there. On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 13:47:23 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting next week on > Monday 21 September at

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Thursday, September 10, 2020 6:00:09 PM CEST Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:58 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > Might be interesting to try logging in as a new user to see if some older > > kde settings are messing things up. > > That's definitely possible... However this is a

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200921.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200920.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 47 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: Conflicting build-ids in chromium and chromium-freeworld

Hi, On Mon, 2020-09-21 at 08:55 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 9/21/20 12:25 AM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > > Hi. There is an ongoing problem with conflicting build-ids in chromium > > and chromium-freeworld [1][2]: > > > Error: Transaction test error: > > >file

Side tag rebuilds an ELN

How do side tag rebuilds and ELN interact? If we do a complicated synchronous package update in a side tag, will ELN track this closely? Or will someone have to redo the same steps in ELN manually? Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial

Copr package build fails on python-nocaselist package

> Please consider reporting this against rpkg-util: > https://pagure.io/rpkg-util I just created https://pagure.io/rpkg-util/issue/28 Andy > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Pavel Raiskup > Subject: Re: Fwd: Copr package

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200921.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200920.0): ID: 672668 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Bug 1880857] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ef530c53af has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ef530c53af -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1880857] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ef530c53af has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ef530c53af --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---

[Bug 1880857] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ef530c53af has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ef530c53af --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---

[Bug 1880852] perl-HTTP-CookieJar-0.010 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880852 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC|

[Bug 1874449] Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.010006

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874449 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1880859] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880859 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8df3ccbaa1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8df3ccbaa1 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---

[Bug 1880859] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880859 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8df3ccbaa1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8df3ccbaa1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1880857] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1880857] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Fwd: Copr package build fails on python-nocaselist package

On Monday, September 21, 2020 9:07:32 AM CEST Andreas R Maier wrote: > Hello Robert, > I suspect the reason I get the python-%{srcname}-%{version} in the .tar.gz > file is that I was setting up COPR to use "rpkg". When using "copr-cli build" > as shown in your mail, it works on COPR. So I think we

[Bug 1880859] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880859 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1880859] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880859 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Fwd: Copr package build fails on python-nocaselist package

Hello Robert, I suspect the reason I get the python-%{srcname}-%{version} in the .tar.gz file is that I was setting up COPR to use "rpkg". When using "copr-cli build" as shown in your mail, it works on COPR. So I think we can ignore that issue. At this point, I can successfully build locally

Re: Discussion: unixODBC - move unversioned *.so files back to unixODBC-devel package

any other suggestions here ? I will be glad, if maintainers of dependent packages will share their opinions. If we fix this issue and it breaks dependent packages, simple workaround via symlink is available until the problems will be solved, so I see no reason for ignoring this problem. On Fri,