On 10/12/20 5:15 PM, Joe Doss wrote:
> On 10/12/20 1:50 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> This would break using Vim when vim-minimal and vim-enhanced are
>> installed (it would start Vi instead of typed Vim). To make it work,
>> vim-minimal would have to conflict with vim-enhanced, which doesn't make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887105
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
A few of us have tossed around the idea of an opam2rpm project before.
Over the last few weeks, I've been working on bringing that to life.
See what I have so far:
https://pagure.io/opam2rpm
I made the possibly controversial decision to write opam2rpm in
python. I did this so that I could
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 11:22, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 14:04:43 +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
> >
> >
> > Reviewed and approved! Good job!
>
> Thanks for the quick review, Andy. Please do let me know if I can help
> review your packages any time.
>
Thanks a lot for the offer :). I
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 2:58 PM Clement Verna
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 10:09, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:33 PM Aoife Moloney
>> wrote:
>> > GitLab
>> > Thank you so much to everyone for adding your questions to the doc for
>> > the GitLab AMA
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 07:39, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> On 10/10/20 2:37 PM, clime wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > could Fedora and CentOS containers for docker and podman come with
> > `alias vim=vi` in ~/.bashrc?
> >
> > I would very much welcome it as I am used to type vim everywhere but
> > if vi
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201011.n.0):
ID: 691959 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691959
Old failures (same test failed in
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 02:26:49PM +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Sorry for top posting, but I'm on mobile at the moment.
No worries. Do note that I am on the list and don't need to be directly
cc'ed on replies. :)
> Please see my post from a couple of weeks ago:
>
OLD: Fedora-33-20201011.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20201012.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887487
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 08:16:31AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:25 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi,
thanks to Pawel Marciniak's pull request [1] I'm happy to announce
vim-default-editor subpackage, which easily sets/removes Vim as the
default editor by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887487
Bug ID: 1887487
Summary: perl-Pod-Simple-3.41 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Pod-Simple
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 10/12/20 1:50 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
This would break using Vim when vim-minimal and vim-enhanced are
installed (it would start Vi instead of typed Vim). To make it work,
vim-minimal would have to conflict with vim-enhanced, which doesn't make
sense - Vi and Vim binaries can exist together
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0f2bfced63
prosody-0.11.7-1.el8
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b15161810d
pdns-4.3.1-1.el8
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870745
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882212
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.045-1.f |perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.045-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884123
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.046-1.f |perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.046-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884124
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.004-1. |perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.004-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882211
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.003-1. |perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.003-1.
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-98b234afda
libuv-1.40.0-1.el7
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bd6a96cd24
python34-3.4.10-7.el7
10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884123
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.046-1.f |perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.046-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884124
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.004-1. |perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.004-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882212
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.045-1.f |perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.045-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882211
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.003-1. |perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.003-1.
Sorry for top posting, but I'm on mobile at the moment.
Please see my post from a couple of weeks ago:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DHLKVLQV2IIB3AGURZ5V37Y2AK2YWSTH/
Many of those stuck updates have no builds associated, therefore they are
On 10/12/20 2:16 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:25 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks to Pawel Marciniak's pull request [1] I'm happy to announce
>> vim-default-editor subpackage, which easily sets/removes Vim as the
>> default editor by installing/uninstalling the
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 10:09, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:33 PM Aoife Moloney
> wrote:
> > GitLab
> > Thank you so much to everyone for adding your questions to the doc for
> > the GitLab AMA session on Thursday 10th September, and for your
> > attendance on the day
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 4:16 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 09.10.20 um 13:18 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos:
>
> LIBCCID_ifdLogLevel=0x000F pcscd --foreground --debug --apdu
> --color | tee log.txt
>
> This the unchanged output:
> 00492770 [140407774111296] auth.c:137:IsClientAuthorized()
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 08:44, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 12.10.2020 14:16, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > 2. Having subpackages like this that conflict by name is going to get
> > crazy really fast, so we need a virtual name to make RPM only permit
> > one of
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:15 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> I wrote to Igor a week ago, but it seems he's away currently, as I didn't get
> an answer yet.
>
> Do you know of some document that describes how to "go through Igor's whole
> weird rust side tag build procedure"? Or, if it's not
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201009.0):
ID: 691693 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL:
Am 11.10.20 um 23:29 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 11/10/2020 18:22, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
On 11.10.20 15:10, H wrote:
I'd like it updated, and kept updated, for EPEL 7.
Do you happen to have a system with the current 10.0.something EPEL7
package set up & would you be willing to - if I
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 8:43 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 12.10.2020 14:16, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > 2. Having subpackages like this that conflict by name is going to get
> > crazy really fast, so we need a virtual name to make RPM only permit
> > one of them at a time.
>
> Btw, why not
On 12.10.2020 14:16, Neal Gompa wrote:
2. Having subpackages like this that conflict by name is going to get
crazy really fast, so we need a virtual name to make RPM only permit
one of them at a time.
Btw, why not to use the Alternatives system for the default text editor,
like Debian/Ubuntu
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 21/181 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:25 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks to Pawel Marciniak's pull request [1] I'm happy to announce
> vim-default-editor subpackage, which easily sets/removes Vim as the
> default editor by installing/uninstalling the subpackage.
>
> Because of nano was selected as
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201011.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201012.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 68
Downgraded packages: 2
Size of added packages: 380.08 KiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887399
Bug ID: 1887399
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.62 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:12:09AM +0300, Alexandru Lazarev wrote:
> In EPEL 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL repository),
> but in EPEL 8 it isn't.
>
> How is it possible to have it there as RPM?
Report the request into Bugzilla against "Fedora EPEL" product and "libcxx"
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 02:18:26PM +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> One thing I forgot that makes things even worse:
>
> - upstream does not support updates across more than one major version,
> so anybody who actually has the old v10 installed will have their
> installation completely
Hi,
thanks to Pawel Marciniak's pull request [1] I'm happy to announce
vim-default-editor subpackage, which easily sets/removes Vim as the
default editor by installing/uninstalling the subpackage.
Because of nano was selected as a default editor since Fedora 33+, the
new subpackage conflicts
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 14:04:43 +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
>
>
> Reviewed and approved! Good job!
Thanks for the quick review, Andy. Please do let me know if I can help
review your packages any time.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201011.0):
ID: 691368 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366
Bug ID: 1887366
Summary: perl-Pod-Usage-2.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Pod-Usage
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:33 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> GitLab
> Thank you so much to everyone for adding your questions to the doc for
> the GitLab AMA session on Thursday 10th September, and for your
> attendance on the day during the call.
> Here is the full AMA transcript
>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 02:37:48PM +0200, clime wrote:
> could Fedora and CentOS containers for docker and podman come with
> `alias vim=vi` in ~/.bashrc?
>
> I would very much welcome it as I am used to type vim everywhere but
> if vi starts instead I am happy too. I know that the solution is to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887018
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1887187
Doc Type|---
I wrote to Igor a week ago, but it seems he's away currently, as I didn't get
an answer yet.
Do you know of some document that describes how to "go through Igor's whole
weird rust side tag build procedure"? Or, if it's not too complicated, would
you mind explaining it?
Hi community,
In EPEL 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL repository),
but in EPEL 8 it isn't.
How is it possible to have it there as RPM? because alternative to build it
(libc++) from sources is a big headache (I need it in order to build v8 and
plv8 projects)
Thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887105
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-942f0c8fba has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-942f0c8fba
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887105
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hi folks! Apologies for the late notice, but I'm proposing we cancel
the QA meeting for tomorrow. We met last week and I don't have much for
the agenda, and also it's a public holiday here in Canada.
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora |
On 10/10/20 5:57 PM, Joe Doss wrote:
> On 10/10/20 7:37 AM, clime wrote:
>> Didn't want to write about this first but maybe there are more people
>> with the same problem.
>
> You are not alone. I had to set the same alias for Fedora CoreOS
> because I kept typing vim out of habit and FCOS ships
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887105
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
55 matches
Mail list logo
