On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:57 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:13:13PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:48 PM Kevin Fenzi
Would be great if we add a deprecation notice (wich could include an EOL
for the symbolic-ref) to git's output while operating on master branch :D
20/12/3 16:53(e)an, Daniel P. Berrangé igorleak idatzi zuen:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
20/12/4 20:42(e)an, Kevin Fenzi igorleak idatzi zuen:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:45:03AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12/3/20 4:39 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
Since I don't
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 04:24:26PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> > Perhaps this is heresy, but we could stop calling our main development
> > stream "rawhide", and instead call it "main", then it will be trivially
> > aligned with the "main" git branch name :-)
>
> But
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:08 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > So, let's say we have 3 small disks: 4GB, 3G, and 2GB.
> >
> > If I create one file of 3GB I think that
> > 3 GB is written on 4GB disk, it leaves 1 GB free.
> > 3 GB of copy is written on 3 GB disk, it
On 12/8/20 2:39 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>
> On 12/8/20 8:11 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I realize this is probably not the most appropriate list
>> to ask this question... but
>>
>> I have a pair of Jabra Elite 45h headphones that
>> was working just fine until I updated to
Hi,
How does this (https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
affect Fedora?
--
--
Sergio Belkin
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Wouldn't "rawhide" be the best name for most git repos, rather than "main"?
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 18:28 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12/8/20 11:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Well, I don't want to keep master around in any form... and yeah, I
> > realize there's going to be fallout. ;(
>
> Maybe we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781753
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902524
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
El mar, 8 dic 2020 a las 20:21, Chris Murphy ()
escribió:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:22 PM Sergio Belkin wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> > I've read the explanation about how much space is available using disks
> with different sizes[1]. I understand the rules, but I see a contradiction
> with definition
PS:
I wrote:
> The optimum size can theoretically be achieved by using the following
> physical partitioning:
> * x GB on the 4 GB disk and the 3 GB disk,
> * y GB on the 4 GB disk and the 2 GB disk, and
> * z GB on the 3 GB disk and the 2 GB disk,
> for a total of x+y+z GB, where x, y, and z
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, at 6:34 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > As a workaround, if you use `keepcache=True` in dnf.conf, you'd have
> > copies of everything you previously installed on your system.
>
> I still don't understand why this is not the default. Even for stable
Sergio Belkin wrote:
> So, let's say we have 3 small disks: 4GB, 3G, and 2GB.
>
> If I create one file of 3GB I think that
> 3 GB is written on 4GB disk, it leaves 1 GB free.
> 3 GB of copy is written on 3 GB disk, it leaves 0 GB Free.
>
> So, I create one file of 1GB that is written on 4GB
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> As a workaround, if you use `keepcache=True` in dnf.conf, you'd have
> copies of everything you previously installed on your system.
I still don't understand why this is not the default. Even for stable
releases, because without it, you can easily obtain only the ancient GA
On 12/8/20 11:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, I don't want to keep master around in any form... and yeah, I
realize there's going to be fallout. ;(
Maybe we can phase it? First, provide the backwards compatible ref, see what
breaks anyway. And only after some time, remove it?
--
Miro
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:18:24 -0500
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:02:01AM -0700, James Szinger wrote:
> > I find the modularity end-user documentation to be woefully
> > inadequate, especially for developers.
>
> Is there a particular part of the documentation you're
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:22 PM Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
> Hi!
> I've read the explanation about how much space is available using disks with
> different sizes[1]. I understand the rules, but I see a contradiction with
> definition of RAID-1 in btrs:
>
> «A form of RAID which stores two complete
On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 9:04:20 PM WET Steve Dickson wrote:
> Its a kernel problem... On the 5-9 kernel I tried
> bluez-5.53, bluez-5.54, bluez-5.5 all failed
> with Connection refused (111)
>
> Then I tried bluez-5.5 on the last 5.8 kernel
> (5.8.18-300.fc33)... everything worked again!
>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:13:13PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:26:18PM +0100,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:02:01AM -0700, James Szinger wrote:
> I find the modularity end-user documentation to be woefully
> inadequate, especially for developers.
Is there a particular part of the documentation you're struggling with, or
something specifically you find missing? I don't mean to
On 12/8/20 10:28 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> But is it a problem of the kernel or the daemon?
>
Its a kernel problem... On the 5-9 kernel I tried
bluez-5.53, bluez-5.54, bluez-5.5 all failed
with Connection refused (111)
Then I tried bluez-5.5 on the last 5.8 kernel
(5.8.18-300.fc33)...
Am 08.12.20 um 19:56 schrieb Japheth Cleaver:
With point releases, at least there was the possibility of flag days around EPEL
ABI changes, however with a rolling release format there seems to need to be an
active synchronization around such changes, as "expected" breakages aren't
really
Am 08.12.20 um 19:32 schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune:
Petr was so nice to supply a test procedure, i suggest that you use it also.
I'll try to strace stuff to to see what's going on, but I can only
assume that this BZ is not trying to resolve ip addresses through
systemd-resolved.
No, they
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 7:53 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Fine for any packages I maintain/co-maintain.
Thanks for the replies, Richard and Andy. Richard, after these builds
are done, I'm going to retire the ocaml-ppxfind package, which will no
longer be used by anything. Consuming packages
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:59 AM Japheth Cleaver wrote:
>
> In light of the announcement, but also specifically:
>
>
On 12/8/20 8:11 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I realize this is probably not the most appropriate list
> to ask this question... but
>
> I have a pair of Jabra Elite 45h headphones that
> was working just fine until I updated to Fedora 33.
>
> When I try to pair via bluetoothctl I
Hi!
I've read the explanation about how much space is available using disks
with different sizes[1]. I understand the rules, but I see a contradiction
with definition of RAID-1 in btrs:
«A form of *RAID* which stores two complete copies of each piece of data.
Each copy is stored on a different
Hi Robin,
"Robin Opletal" writes:
> Hi,
>
> As I have said earlier, I am trying to package aerc, the mail client,
> for Fedora. What didn't cross my mind is that internet access will be
> limited during the build, thus the automatic dependency resolution
> from the Makefile during the build
On 12/8/20 10:28 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Clearly I am stealing the thread but I also have a problem with bluetooth in
> Fedora 33 and I unable to point what is the problem.
>
>
> I have followed the instruction at
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Bluetooth_problems
On 9/3/20 4:47 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi all,
Some exciting updates re: Lua packaging
TL;DR we want to simplify the Lua packaging experience as much as
possible, across both Fedora and RHEL.
Some background:
- before RHEL 7, the Lua RPM does not provide "lua(abi) = MAJ.MIN" so a
In light of the announcement, but also specifically:
https://centos.org/distro-faq/#q8-i-need-to-buildtest-my-packages-for-epel-locally-which-i-used-centos-for-centos-stream-will-have-different-abiapi-at-times-so-my-builds-wont-work-with-that
On 12/8/20 8:31 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:10 PM Steve Dickson wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I realize this is probably not the most appropriate list
>> to ask this question... but
>>
>> I have a pair of Jabra Elite 45h headphones that
>> was working just fine until I
> Can you pls get another stackframe and compare it ( it won't match 100%
> as differen apps go different way) with this bugreport:
It won't matter much, the next frame is in Varnish code.
Here is the pstack dump of dig:
> Thread 4 (Thread 0x7fee8a3e4640 (LWP 1768516) "isc-socket"):
> #0
Am 08.12.20 um 18:01 schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune:
Since the upgrade to f33 I replaced my stubby setup with
systemd-resolved since it is now the default. I was OK with that
change since I didn't lose functionality compared to my previous
setup. But it is breaking getaddrinfo() and IP address
Greetings,
I'm not sure whether I am doing something wrong so I'd rather get
someone's opinion before submitting a bug report.
Since the upgrade to f33 I replaced my stubby setup with
systemd-resolved since it is now the default. I was OK with that
change since I didn't lose functionality
On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 1:31:15 PM WET Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:10 PM Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > I realize this is probably not the most appropriate list
> > to ask this question... but
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a pair of Jabra Elite 45h
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 18/180 (x86_64), 15/122 (aarch64)
New failures
On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:21:35 -0600
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:33 am, James Szinger
> wrote:
> > Undelivered -devel packages and modularity are killer anti-features
> > of EL 8—it is way too hard to build the software I need.
>
> Honestly I don't think modularity is
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:38:20PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to update several of the OCaml PPX packages to more
> recent versions, but doing so requires messing around with other
> people's packages. This is the set of updates I would like to make:
>
>
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, at 11:45 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> I'm wondering, wouldn't this scenario be a prime application of an
> OSTree based system like Silverblue?
...
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, at 12:28 PM, Martin Kolman wrote:
> With OSTree one could easily have multiple update states
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905544
Bug ID: 1905544
Summary: perl-PerlIO-via-QuotedPrint-0.09 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PerlIO-via-QuotedPrint
Keywords:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:42, Sohan Kunkerkar wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> Good day! I hope everyone is keeping well in these unprecedented and
> difficult times.
> My name is Sohan Kunkerkar and I'm a software engineer at Red Hat Inc
> helping to develop and maintain a container-focused operating
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:55, Robin Opletal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My name is Robin Opletal, I am from the Czech Republic and online I tend
> to go under the name of "fourstepper".
>
> I would like to help out with maintaining packages of interest for
> Fedora, currently, I am interested in getting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905399
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889575
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:10 PM Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I realize this is probably not the most appropriate list
> to ask this question... but
>
> I have a pair of Jabra Elite 45h headphones that
> was working just fine until I updated to Fedora 33.
>
> When I try to pair via
Hello,
I realize this is probably not the most appropriate list
to ask this question... but
I have a pair of Jabra Elite 45h headphones that
was working just fine until I updated to Fedora 33.
When I try to pair via bluetoothctl I get the following error
[bluetooth]# pair 70:BF:92:D6:51:CB
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Rawhide 20201208.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781753
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
Dear Antonio,
thanks for the quick reply. This helped a lot.
I had to add `%undefine __cmake3_in_source_build` to the spec file, in addition
to the `%undefine __cmake_in_source_build`
Best regards
Wolfgang
___
devel mailing list --
Dan Horák left as an exercise for the reader:
> > I'm trying to debug a unit test failure that's only showing up
> > on s390x for notcurses. I've been able to get a s390x build
> > going with
> >
> > "mock -r fedora-34-s390x --arch=s390x --forcearch=s390x"
>
> haven't you received my email
Neal Gompa already backported (cmake3-3.17.3-3.el7) support for
out-of-source builds:
- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a911888c3e
-
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cmake3/c/1e92b954226f002762fa98582367c080f267d449?branch=epel7
On 08/12/20 07:00, Wolfgang Stoeggl
Neal Gompa already backported (cmake3-3.17.3-3.el7) support for
out-of-source builds:
- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a911888c3e
-
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cmake3/c/1e92b954226f002762fa98582367c080f267d449?branch=epel7
On 08/12/20 07:00, Wolfgang Stoeggl
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12/8/20 10:26 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> > This time I got eight separate Bugzilla issues, which all essentially
> > just served as notification that GCC has been upgraded, and each one
> > needs to be closed manually. That's manageable as long as the number of
> > Ada
On 12/8/20 10:26 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
This time I got eight separate Bugzilla issues, which all essentially
just served as notification that GCC has been upgraded, and each one
needs to be closed manually. That's manageable as long as the number of
Ada packages is small, but it still feels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905399
Bug ID: 1905399
Summary: perl-CBOR-XS-1.83 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CBOR-XS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Jeff Law wrote:
> On 12/7/20 11:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:29:51PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> Hello. Apparently, many packages in rawhide require
> >> libgnat-10.so()(64bit):
> > I'm not a provenpackager, so I'm afraid I can't do that myself.
> > Perhaps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905389
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hi Nick,
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 04:13:31 -0500
Nick Black wrote:
> I'm trying to debug a unit test failure that's only showing up
> on s390x for notcurses. I've been able to get a s390x build
> going with
>
> "mock -r fedora-34-s390x --arch=s390x --forcearch=s390x"
haven't you received my email
I'm trying to debug a unit test failure that's only showing up
on s390x for notcurses. I've been able to get a s390x build
going with
"mock -r fedora-34-s390x --arch=s390x --forcearch=s390x"
but the tests aren't run within:
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qGYPWH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905389
Bug ID: 1905389
Summary: perl-Number-Fraction-3.0.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Number-Fraction
Keywords: FutureFeature,
62 matches
Mail list logo
