Hi,
Yes the guidelines are clear for fedora. I miss tell that the package is
present in fedora and epel repos and my question is more like this:
Is it possible to mix bundled/system libs ? like using system libs (the
must part in guidelines) for fedora packages and use bundled one for
epel
> The weakest point in the current system is really the FAS password. If
> you have a packager's FAS password you can change the ssh key
> associated with the account to another that you control, and the FAS
> password is also all you need to run a build and submit it to Bodhi.
Or you add an SSH
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/12/24/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.9-1.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bc6881c4f5
pngcheck-2.4.0-5.el7
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dddcb59a9c
phpldapadmin-1.2.5-1.el7
7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910212
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910212
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Tk-GraphViz-1.08 is|perl-Tk-GraphViz-1.09 is
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c82583d07e
pngcheck-2.4.0-5.el8
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-fe42686452
mbedtls-2.16.9-1.el8
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904001
--- Comment #9 from Doran Moppert ---
Note this vulnerability affects the php Archive_Tar package, not the perl
package with the same name. Archive_Tar is included in Fedora and Red Hat
Enterprise Linux bundled in the php-pear package.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904001
Doran Moppert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1910452, 1910451, 1910454,
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 17:03, clime wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:23, James Szinger wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:51:49 +0100
> > clime wrote:
> >
> > > Well, the users here are still packagers here no? I thought the "User"
> > > in the title means "end user" who shouldn't be
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020, at 11:28 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMCoW
>
>
> == Summary ==
>
> RPM Copy on Write provides a better experience for Fedora Users as it
> reduces the amount of I/O and offsets CPU cost of package
> decompression. RPM Copy on Write uses
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 10:49 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020, at 11:28 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > ## Regular RPMs use a compressed .cpio based payload. In contrast,
> > extent based RPMs contain uncompressed data aligned to the fundamental
> > page size of the architecture,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 8:43 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
> I'm not in favor of that -- I think it's generally not the best policy
Correct, that is what FIDO2 biometrics are designed to
replace entirely. Passwords, in general, must die.
> and doesn't address the issue directly.
Agreed, as was
Hi all.
Next release of Sundials will be the 5.6.1:
https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/releases/tag/v5.6.1
(Included changes of the 5.6.0 [1])
I'll update Sundials in Rawhide after the New Years'Day
[1] https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/releases/tag/v5.6.0
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:06:25PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Maybe mandatory password/key rotation is an option? With your account
> disabled after a grace period if the password is expired.
I'm not in favor of that -- I think it's generally not the best policy¹ and
doesn't address
On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 00:49 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:37 AM Peter Robinson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:20 AM Kevin Fenzi
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:22:17PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:02
On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 18:04 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Gary Buhrmaster:
>
> > It does support it, but AFAIK does not require it.
> >
> > Arguably those with elevated access (provenpackagers(*))
> > should be required to use a hardware token such
> > as a FIDO2 authenticators with
Hello,
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Slaanesh is still active. The best way to contact him is through e-mail.
even the RHBZs should already have lead to e-mails, I'm trying it directly
as suggested: Please respond to libtelnet vs. EPEL 8:
On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 13:29 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Meanwhile, I've built the current version 6.5.0 in f33 ...
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5a9f9cd189
>
> ... but wasn't lucky in Rawhide. I haven't found out what the problem
> is exactly, but it looks like it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910394
Bug ID: 1910394
Summary: perl-Devel-PatchPerl-2.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-PatchPerl
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020, at 12:04 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is there even meaningful two-factor authentication support for Git
> pushes, anywhere? (Not just in the Fedora infrastructure.)
This problem is solved by my plan:
* Gary Buhrmaster:
> It does support it, but AFAIK does not require it.
>
> Arguably those with elevated access (provenpackagers(*))
> should be required to use a hardware token such
> as a FIDO2 authenticators with biometrics and/or
> PIN required (some phones with biometrics are
> are
On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 15:05 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:49 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Maybe Fedora should add 2FA support and require it for the most powerful
> > groups?
> >
>
> It does support it, but AFAIK does not require it.
old-FAS
Le 22/12/2020 à 10:55, Remi Collet a écrit :
I've start working on a package update
and this will probably become the new upstream
for the fedora libmemcached package
A scratch build is available
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58118722
From my local tests, everything
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:11 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:56:25PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> ...snip...
> > > > What I'd really like would be a "test mass rebuild" process, where a
> > > > prospective package is uploaded and everything that depends on it is
> > > >
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:49 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> Maybe Fedora should add 2FA support and require it for the most powerful
> groups?
>
It does support it, but AFAIK does not require it.
Arguably those with elevated access (provenpackagers(*))
should be required to use a
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:32 pm, Vít Ondruch
wrote:
You see that I have executed FF from terminal. But I think that if
any other process running in the app-org.gnome.Terminal.slice starts
to grow memory usage, the whole tree will be killed.
systemd scopes get cgroups too, so only the scope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904001
msidd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mre...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904001
msidd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1910324
--
You are receiving
On Thursday, 17 December 2020 00:08:48 IST Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Roberto Ragusa writes:
>
> > On 12/16/20 2:55 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> >
> >> Believe it or not, GNU/Linux is no longer a text-only operating system, nor
> >> are window managers just a container for terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904001
msidd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|CVE-2020-28948 |CVE-2020-28948 Archive_tar:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904001
msidd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|CVE-2020-28948 Archive_tar: |CVE-2020-28948 Archive_Tar:
On 22.12.2020 21:39, Adam Williamson wrote:
Perhaps we need a process for cleaning up membership of this extremely
powerful group? If the FAS password of*any one* of those user accounts
were somehow compromised (or if just one of them decided they had a
grudge against Fedora now and were going
Hi there,
I compiled i-nex [1] for the new libcpuid-0.5.0 [3].
When starting i-nex [2] I get a segmentation fault (core dumped).
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/i-nex/blob/HEAD/f/i-nex.spec
[2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1661492
[3]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904001
msidd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hho...@redhat.com,
Hi Guido,
sending this from my private address, because I won't read my company
email until I return to work next year ;). Please keep me in Cc.
On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 10:55 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> Hi,
> ardour5 fails to build in rawhide and it has been obsoleted by
> ardour6.
>
> Should we
Hi,
I'm also trying to build latest ceph on arm32 under CentOS 7
(odroid-hc2) and it keeps failing for various reasons. Main reason seems
to be the lack of:
devtoolset-8-gcc-8.3.1-3.1.el7.src.rpm
A very helpful and friendly member of the centos mailing list pointed me
to an earlier version
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 2:11 AM Didier Fabert
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to deal with package which add new cool feature, but unfortunately
> by adding bundled (static) libraries ?
>
> 1. I do nothing, this feature cannot be included this way
> 2. I can add the feature because libraries are statically
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:11:53 +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> > The last time I had asked about Nvidia+Fedora was in 2018 when booting
> > an installation would end up with a terribly slow GNOME Shell:
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910310
Bug ID: 1910310
Summary: perl-libnet-3.13 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-libnet
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Dne 22. 12. 20 v 16:45 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a):
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:45 am, Vít Ondruch
wrote:
And I wonder what will be the behavior for applications, which I
start from my terminal? The most typical example for me is running
GVim from gnome-terminal.
Each gnome-terminal tab
Hi
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:54 AM Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:15:32 +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> > Can you check and look for GL_OUT_OF_MEMORY messages in the journalctl
> logs
> > for gnome-shell? (Xwayland being spawned by gnome-shell, the messages
> from
> >
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:15:32 +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Can you check and look for GL_OUT_OF_MEMORY messages in the journalctl logs
> for gnome-shell? (Xwayland being spawned by gnome-shell, the messages from
> Xwayland will be marked as gnome-shell in the logs)
>
> Xwayland uses glamor by
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 745691 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/745691
ID: 745698 Test: aarch64
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 03:55:22PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:44 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps we need a process for cleaning up membership of this extremely
> > powerful group?
>
> Yes, please.
I think we should split the issue in two: handling the long
Hi,
How to deal with package which add new cool feature, but unfortunately
by adding bundled (static) libraries ?
1. I do nothing, this feature cannot be included this way
2. I can add the feature because libraries are statically linked
3. I can add the feature anyway if I declare bundled
46 matches
Mail list logo
