Fedora-Cloud-33-20210214.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210213.0): ID: 776952 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2021-02-15 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't have anything urgent this week. We did just branch and there are things we could kick around, but Monday's a public holiday in Canada so I won't be around to run a meeting. If someone else wants to run a meeting, please do reply t

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable btrfs transparent zstd compression by default (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi, On 2/11/21 11:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 9:58 AM Jeremy Linton wrote: Hi, On 1/1/21 8:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: Anyway, compress=zstd:1 is a good default. Everyone benefits, and I'm not even sure someone with a very fast NVMe drive will notice a slow down beca

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

> The GPUs also have firmware blobs Could you provide some links to mailing list posts or bug reports where AMD developers confirm that their GPU firmware requires 4k pages? I think having some definitive sources will make this situation more clear. So far the only amdgpu bug report I could fin

Re: Unable to install using Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-34-20210213.n.0.iso

Ian Laurie wrote on 2021/02/14 11:44: Tried KDE. Part way through the installation got the following error: "The following error occurred while installing the payload. This is a fatal error and installation will be aborted. DNF error:Error in POSTIN scriptlet in rpm package xorg-x11-fonts-IS

Re: Unable to install using Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-34-20210213.n.0.iso

TE would have worked without that selected. -- Ian On 14/02/2021 12:24 pm, Ian Laurie wrote: I tried testing out Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-34-20210213.n.0.iso with an Xfce and MATE

Re: Unable to install using Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-34-20210213.n.0.iso

Ian Laurie wrote: I tried testing out Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-34-20210213.n.0.iso with an Xfce and MATE install, both failed. I've attached screen shots of the error my software selection gave me f

Unable to install using Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-34-20210213.n.0.iso

I tried testing out Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-34-20210213.n.0.iso with an Xfce and MATE install, both failed. I've attached screen shots of the error my software selection gave me for each attempt. --

Re: ELN SIG Launch

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 10:42:51PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Why would I bother signing up for such a license if I will be able (very > likely before the CentOS 8 EOL) to just download Rocky Linux the same way I > can download Fedora or Debian? That's fine too -- it *is* open source

Re: ELN SIG Launch

Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > And ELN leeching Fedora hardware infrastructure that is actually paid by > Red Hat to begin with is one thing, but Stephen Gallagher's announcement > goes as far as attempting to leech unpaid community manpower. PS: But even if this attempt at poaching community vol

Re: ELN SIG Launch

On 13. 02. 21 23:00, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: And ELN leeching Fedora hardware infrastructure that is actually paid by Red Hat to begin with is one thing, but Stephen Gallagher's announcement goes as far as attempting to leech unpaid community manpower. That claim is simply not true. Steph

Re: Copr in 2020 and outlook for 2021

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 9:52 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > * Contribute to fedpkg/koji to have machine-readable output. There is a "--json" argument to "koji call", and that produces machine-readable output for individual Koji RPCs. It would be really nice if rpkg had something similar, or even an

Re: ELN SIG Launch

Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > In written English the word 'or' is not exclusive and 'yes' is a synonym > for 'TRUE'. Basically the question is Stephen trying a CS pun with that > of > > Is this a Fedora project || a Red Hat project using Fedora resources. > > It would evaluate as TRUE/yes in eit

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 14:06, Alex Perez wrote: > Kevin, > > On 2/13/2021 9:51:48 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 05:15, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> >> >> On 13/02/2021 09:11, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> > Dnia Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:16:26PM +0100, Daniel Pocock napisał(a

Re: ELN SIG Launch

Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > Perhaps you missed the announcement that "small" > production environments (up to 16? servers) are now > "free" under the RH developer licensees. That may > not be a lot of servers for the hyperscallers, but > for smaller deployments it may cover you. Should > I have chos

Re: Orphaned my Ruby packages (Jekyll + dependencies)

Sad day indeed, but the situation is indeed a tough one. I also switched to bundler for similar reasons and pain for my jekyll sites. Thanks so much for your service Fabio! I don't have time/bandwidth to take over completely, but I could offer some assistance/backup if somebody else takes prim

Orphaned my Ruby packages (Jekyll + dependencies)

Hi everybody, With a heavy heart, I have orphaned all my Ruby packages today. - rubygem-jekyll - rubygem-jekyll-asciidoc (official, optional AsciiDoc support) - rubygem-jekyll-feed (dep of the default theme) - rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter (jekyll dep) - rubygem-jekyll-seo-tag (dep of the default

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

Kevin, On 2/13/2021 9:51:48 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 05:15, Daniel Pocock mailto:dan...@pocock.pro]> wrote: On 13/02/2021 09:11, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > Dnia Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:16:26PM +0100, Daniel Pocock napisał(a): >> >> >> On 12/02/2021 21:19, Justin Forb

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 13/02/2021 18:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 05:15, Daniel Pocock > wrote: > > > > On 13/02/2021 09:11, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > Dnia Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:16:26PM +0100, Daniel Pocock napisał(a): > >> > >> > >>

FedoraRespin-33-updates-20210212.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/37 (x86_64) ID: 776919 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/776919 ID: 776921 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 05:15, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 13/02/2021 09:11, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > Dnia Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:16:26PM +0100, Daniel Pocock napisał(a): > >> > >> > >> On 12/02/2021 21:19, Justin Forbes wrote: > >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:21 AM Ben Cotton > wrote: > >

Re: ELN SIG Launch

On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 19:59, Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Is this a Fedora project or a Red Hat project using Fedora resources? > > > > Yes. > > "Yes" is not a valid answer to that "or" question. > > In written English the word 'or

Re: Fedora's GPG key in DNS(SEC)

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 05:57:07PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Does somebody knows where is the source for: > https://getfedora.org/security/ > ? I want to submit PR with information that these keys are in DNS as well, > but I have no idea where to go. https://pagure.io/fedora-web/websites/b

Re: Fedora's GPG key in DNS(SEC)

Dne 12. 02. 21 v 20:22 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): All Fedora's GPG key - starting with Fedora 27 - are now stored in fedoraproject.org DNS record and can be verified using DNSSEC. Why? How it can be used? That is long story and you can read about it in my blog entry:    http://miroslav.suchy.

Fedora-34-20210213.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 36/183 (x86_64), 27/124 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210212.n.0): ID: 776560 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210213.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210212.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210213.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 82 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 11.61 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: dropping php-imap (was Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On 2/13/21 1:48 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 02. 21 12:17, Joe Orton wrote: On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 06:43:29PM +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: Can uw-imap be replaced with something else, or should someone pick it up? There has not been an upstream release since 2007 - the maintainer Ma

[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Branched 20210213.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 34 Branched 20210213.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Fedora's GPG key in DNS(SEC)

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:47:47PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 08:22:45PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Comments are welcomed. > > You can use "host -t TYPE61" instead of "dig" to get less verbose output. > "host -v -t TYPE61" will show a little more (like the flags)

Re: dropping php-imap (was Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On 09. 02. 21 12:17, Joe Orton wrote: On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 06:43:29PM +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: Can uw-imap be replaced with something else, or should someone pick it up? There has not been an upstream release since 2007 - the maintainer Mark Crispin sadly died in 2012, and nobody

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 13/02/2021 09:11, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > Dnia Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:16:26PM +0100, Daniel Pocock napisał(a): >> >> >> On 12/02/2021 21:19, Justin Forbes wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Power4kPageSize ==

Re: ELN SIG Launch

Den lör 13 feb. 2021 kl 02:10 skrev Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>: > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > And why would I want to do Red Hat's / IBM's work for free? > > > > Contributing to Fedora provides value to me because I use Fedora myself. > > In contrast, what would

Re: ELN SIG Launch

On 13. 02. 21 1:57, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Do I need to be employed by Red Hat to be a member of the ELN SIG? No, anyone with an interest in helping will be welcomed enthusiastically! And why would I want to do Red Hat's / IBM's work for free? Contributing to Fedora provides value to me

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210212.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210211.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210212.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 15 Added packages: 126 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 179 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 159.48 MiB Size of dropped packages:

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210213.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210212.0): ID: 776544 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Fedora 33 Beta blocker status email #1

On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 20:50 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 02:02:16AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Ben Cotton wrote: > > > 2. kde-settings — KDE needs to pick up F34 backgrounds — NEW > > > ACTION: kde-settings maintainers to adopt F34 backgrounds > > > > Oh, it

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

Dnia Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:16:26PM +0100, Daniel Pocock napisał(a): > > > On 12/02/2021 21:19, Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > >> > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Power4kPageSize > >> > >> == Summary == > >> > >> On ppc64le, the kernel i