Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

V Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:46:52AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 01:04:56AM +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: > > Yes, the idea I had in mind was that each package that currenty has an > > "epel8" branch would also get an "epeln" branch that would be built > > against

Re: srpm rebuilding on RISC-V fedora image

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:29 AM Billa Surendra wrote: > > > Without Correcting right URL to fedora-33-riscv64.cfg file we can not use > MOCK for rebuilding SRPM's for RISC-V architecture. Can anyone please > suggest what I can do now to correct it?. How can I contact MirrorManager to > correct

Re: srpm rebuilding on RISC-V fedora image

Without Correcting right URL to fedora-33-riscv64.cfg file we can not use MOCK for rebuilding SRPM's for RISC-V architecture. Can anyone please suggest what I can do now to correct it?. How can I contact MirrorManager to correct the URL to the right location?. Thanks in advance Billa

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-03-04 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/04/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210304gite9b4eb594.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1934823] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement()

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934823 Product Security DevOps Team changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1933852] perl-Locale-Codes-3.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933852 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-177f55ccfa has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1931135] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931135 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1890793] EPEL8 Request: perl-Devel-REPL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890793 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

Re: Bodhi client prompting for a password

Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:31 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 03. 03. 21 21:08, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > I want to run this command: > > > > > >bodhi updates trigger-tests FEDORA-2021-279dee1742 > > > > > > But I'm prompted for a username and password. I have a

[Bug 1933914] perl-Data-Printer-1.000004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933914 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Data-Printer-1.03

Re: Bodhi client prompting for a password

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:36:17PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:31 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 03. 03. 21 21:08, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > I want to run this command: > > > > > >bodhi updates trigger-tests FEDORA-2021-279dee1742 > > > > > > But I'm prompted

[Bug 1933852] perl-Locale-Codes-3.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933852 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-68b17b9ac4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

Re: Bodhi client prompting for a password

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:31 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 03. 03. 21 21:08, Florian Weimer wrote: > > I want to run this command: > > > >bodhi updates trigger-tests FEDORA-2021-279dee1742 > > > > But I'm prompted for a username and password. I have a working Kerberos > > setup for

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-03-04 17:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2021-03-04 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2021-03-04 09:00 PST US/Pacific 2021-03-04

[Bug 1934824] New: CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824 Bug ID: 1934824 Summary: CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 33 Status: NEW

[Bug 1934823] New: CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement()

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934823 Bug ID: 1934823 Summary: CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux

[Bug 1934823] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement()

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934823 --- Comment #1 from Pedro Sampaio --- Created slic3r tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: fedora-all [bug 1934824] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1934823] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement()

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934823 Pedro Sampaio changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1934824 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1934824] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824 --- Comment #1 from Pedro Sampaio --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all

[Bug 1934824] CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824 Pedro Sampaio changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1934823 (CVE-2020-28591)

Re: Update gating test is "failed" with no useful information

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 08:26:31AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 13:59 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Other tests are kind of random. I mean, what does this mean?

Re: Bodhi client prompting for a password

On 03. 03. 21 21:08, Florian Weimer wrote: I want to run this command: bodhi updates trigger-tests FEDORA-2021-279dee1742 But I'm prompted for a username and password. I have a working Kerberos setup for koji/fedpkg, so this is somewhat surprising. Is this expected? Yes, that is how

[389-devel] please review: PR 4655 - UI - migrate modals to PF4

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4655 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

In our code base (restraint), we patch and recompile the m4 code base. https://github.com/tar-mirror/gnu-m4 In their code, they have the following which fails to compile when SIGSTKSZ < 16384 is interpreted. This is going to be a challenge to make work. # define SIGSTKSZ 8192 #ifndef SIGSTKSZ #

Bodhi client prompting for a password

I want to run this command: bodhi updates trigger-tests FEDORA-2021-279dee1742 But I'm prompted for a username and password. I have a working Kerberos setup for koji/fedpkg, so this is somewhat surprising. Is this expected? I'm a bit hesitant to enter my Fedora Kerberos password in random

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

* Carol Bouchard: > Thank you Daniel and Richard. I'm going to have to study this some to > understand how this solves the compile issue cause the glibc code > isn't gone. It's still there. SIGSTKSZ is no longer a (preprocessor) constant. If you use it in place where a variable is expected,

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

Thank you Daniel and Richard. I'm going to have to study this some to understand how this solves the compile issue cause the glibc code isn't gone. It's still there. Carol On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 11:31 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:24:35PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé

[Bug 1934690] perl-URI-5.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934690 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f8d4087924 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f8d4087924 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1934690] perl-URI-5.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934690 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1934759] New: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934759 Bug ID: 1934759 Summary: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1.16 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-JavaScript-Minifier Keywords:

[rpms/perl-URI] PR #1: Tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-URI` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-URI/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Building custom kernels

Thanks for doing the work and posting the result / solution. On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:19:14 +0100 Julian Sikorski wrote: > I did actually manage to get this working, big thanks go to > chenxiaolong for their guide [1]. I did mix-and-match some of the > info from Fedora docs [2][3], mainly

Fedora Linux 34 Beta Go/No-Go meeting next week

Hi everyone, It's that time already! The Fedora Linux 34 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday 11 March at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will determine the status of the F34 Beta for the 16 March preferred target date. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting,

Fedora Linux 34 Beta Go/No-Go meeting next week

Hi everyone, It's that time already! The Fedora Linux 34 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday 11 March at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will determine the status of the F34 Beta for the 16 March preferred target date. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting,

[rpms/perl-URI] PR #1: Tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-URI` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-URI/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Building custom kernels

W dniu 03.03.2021 o 17:01, stan via devel pisze: On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:27:16 +0100 Julian Sikorski wrote: Am 03.03.21 um 14:00 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski: There seems to be some documentation on the wiki:

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > […] > The purpose here is to make the Fedora project a more welcoming place to > people who _do_ find those terms unwelcome. That doesn't mean everyone > does. It means we want to be welcoming and not jerks. ^ > I'm

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 01:04:56AM +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: > On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 12:47 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'm not sure exactly what you mean here... > > > > I think (please correct me if I'm wrong) you are wanting "all EPEL > > packages" to also be built as part of

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 11:36:45AM -0600, Renich Bon Ciric wrote: > I haven't read the whole thread but I cannot believe everybody just > went with it. > > What is the practical purpose of changing master to main? I see no > benefit whatsoever. We're only making this politicized. > > I haven't

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jerry James wrote: > Oh no! I thought I had tracked down all of the consumers of > ocaml-ppx-tools-versioned. So, no, ocaml-ppx-tools is not a straight > replacement. Users of ocaml-ppx-tools-versioned are supposed to > migrate to ocaml-ppxlib. I'll see what

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

Hi, On 3/2/21 5:20 PM, Pavel Březina wrote: > On 3/2/21 4:25 PM, Ray Strode wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Ahh, okay. >> >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:31 AM Hans de Goede wrote: >>> sudo authselect select minimal >>> sudo authselect apply-changes >>> >>> Which results in the following

[Bug 1934690] perl-URI-5.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934690 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1934690] New: perl-URI-5.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934690 Bug ID: 1934690 Summary: perl-URI-5.09 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-URI Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:24:35PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:07:48AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: > > I'm seeing the following compile error in my product which I'm not seeing > > with earlier versions of Fedora. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:57 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > haxe FTBFS because it depends on ocaml-ppx-tools-versioned-devel which > was removed from Rawhide. I'm not clear if ocaml-ppx-tools is a > straight replacement, but I didn't attempt to fix this package, so > please take a look. Also

Re: Building custom kernels

On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:27:16 +0100 Julian Sikorski wrote: > Am 03.03.21 um 14:00 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski: > > > > There seems to be some documentation on the wiki: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BuildingUpstreamKernel#Sign_the_kernel_for_Secure_Boot > > > > Regards, > >

Re: Fedora 35 Change: rpmautospec - removing release and changelog fields from spec files (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:20 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:07:44AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 02. 03. 21 22:05, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > The devil is in the details: pre-release, snapinfo, minorbump aren't > > > really > > > covered by distance being

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2021-03-03)

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-03-03/fesco.2021-03-03-15.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-03-03/fesco.2021-03-03-15.00.txt Log:

[Bug 1933868] perl-Date-Manip-6.85 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933868 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1933852] perl-Locale-Codes-3.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933852 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

Re: Draft of New Python Packaging Guidelines - 0.3

Hello, After (other parts of) $DAY_JOB delayed this for a while, a slightly updated draft is at https://hackmd.io/XzJe-sHUQvWK7cSrEH_aKg (and attached). More importantly, here is the requested summary of changes from the old guidelines, roughly sorted by "importance":

Fedora-IoT-34-20210303.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210227.0): ID: 798176 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/798176 ID: 798185 Test: aarch64

[Bug 1931967] perl-App-cpm-0.997003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931967 Bug 1931967 depends on bug 1932395, which changed state. Bug 1932395 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-02Packages-Search - Search Perl modules in 02packages.details.txt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932395 What

[Bug 1934532] EPEL8 Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934532 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Fedora-34-20210303.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 24/126 (aarch64), 17/187 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210302.n.1): ID: 797974 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/797974 ID: 797981 Test: aarch64

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:07:48AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: > I'm seeing the following compile error in my product which I'm not seeing > with earlier versions of Fedora. > > > > > > > > > > > > *make[4]: Entering directory >

Fedora/f35 compile error

I'm seeing the following compile error in my product which I'm not seeing with earlier versions of Fedora. *make[4]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/restraint-0.3.2/third-party/m4-1.4.18/lib' CC gl_avltree_oset.o CC binary-io.o CC c-ctype.o CC c-stack.oIn file

Re: Fedora Account System and Bugzilla Mismatch email

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:27:44AM -, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > Hey, > > I got an email asking me to change my fedora email to match my BZ account. > Problem is, in BZ I have to use my redhat account which allows me to be > granted special permissions for RH-related bugs. Fedora wants to do

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Miro Hrončok wrote: > 1) Why 269 and not 2.69? I guess that this is a historical thing: past autoconf compatibility packages always had names such as autoconf213. Back then, dots in package names were considered unusual or harmful, standard practice was to omit them. The rule that the dot

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Miro Hrončok wrote: > 2) Is the parallel installability worth the trouble of different names? IMHO, yes. Some projects require developers to run autoconf to pregenerate the scripts, so they will need to be able to work with more than one version. Past autoconf compatibility packages in Fedora

Re: Building custom kernels

Am 03.03.21 um 14:00 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski: On Wednesday, 03 March 2021 at 13:53, Julian Sikorski wrote: [...] Now that the kernels have built successfully I have another question: is there an easy way of signing them so that secureboot can stay enabled? I have generated a

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:51 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 03. 03. 21 13:47, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:33 PM Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 03. 03. 21 12:49, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > > Compat package prepared. > > > > >

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210303.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210302.n.1 NEW: Fedora-34-20210303.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Merging mingw specs into native spec

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:29:43AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 12:45:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 01:31:13PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > +%if %{_with_mingw} > > > + > > > +%package -n mingw32-libvirt-glib > > > +Summary:

Re: Building custom kernels

On Wednesday, 03 March 2021 at 13:53, Julian Sikorski wrote: [...] > Now that the kernels have built successfully I have another question: is > there an easy way of signing them so that secureboot can stay enabled? I > have generated a key/certificate pair as described in the docs [1] but I was >

Re: Building custom kernels

Am 02.03.21 um 18:24 schrieb Julian Sikorski: W dniu 02.03.2021 o 18:10, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 02.03.2021 o 13:42, Justin Forbes pisze: On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:32 AM Julian Sikorski wrote: Am 01.03.21 um 17:37 schrieb Brandon Nielsen: On 2/28/21 12:00 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: W

[Bug 1934532] New: EPEL8 Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934532 Bug ID: 1934532 Summary: EPEL8 Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO Assignee:

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 03. 03. 21 13:47, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:33 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 03. 03. 21 12:49, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Compat package prepared. > > Package autoconf269-2.69-1 provides: > > /usr/bin/autoconf269 >

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:33 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 03. 03. 21 12:49, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > Compat package prepared. > > > > Package autoconf269-2.69-1 provides: > > > > /usr/bin/autoconf269 > > /usr/bin/autoheader269 > > /usr/bin/autom4te269 > > /usr/bin/autoreconf269 > >

Re: srpm rebuilding on RISC-V fedora image

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 12:30 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:45:35PM +0530, Billa Surendra wrote: > > Dear Richard, > > Please send messages to the Fedora devel list so there is > a public record and so others can help. > > > I am trying to initialize the mock chroot

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 03. 03. 21 12:49, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: Compat package prepared. Package autoconf269-2.69-1 provides: /usr/bin/autoconf269 /usr/bin/autoheader269 /usr/bin/autom4te269 /usr/bin/autoreconf269 /usr/bin/autoscan269 /usr/bin/autoupdate269 /usr/bin/ifnames269 ... Parallel installation successful.

Re: Orphaned Telegram packages

On 03.03.2021 12:57, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Indeed, next time please orphan packages instead of retiring them outright. They will be automatically retired if nobody adopts them. Got it. Thanks for the info. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: srpm rebuilding on RISC-V fedora image

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:45:35PM +0530, Billa Surendra wrote: > Dear Richard, Please send messages to the Fedora devel list so there is a public record and so others can help. > I am trying to initialize the mock chroot before performing the first rebuild > SRPM on RISC-V fedora image. > > In

Re: OCaml 4.12

Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I also recall there was some discussion about whether we need > OCaml 4.12 in Fedora 34. I would prefer _not_ to do this, not only > because it's another couple of days of work, but also because > Fedora 34 is feeding into RHEL 9 and it would pull at least one more >

Re: Orphaned Telegram packages

Dan Čermák wrote: > The package is now retired, was that intentional? Note that this makes > adopting it much more of a hassle. Indeed, next time please orphan packages instead of retiring them outright. They will be automatically retired if nobody adopts them. Kevin Kofler

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Compat package prepared. Package autoconf269-2.69-1 provides: /usr/bin/autoconf269 /usr/bin/autoheader269 /usr/bin/autom4te269 /usr/bin/autoreconf269 /usr/bin/autoscan269 /usr/bin/autoupdate269 /usr/bin/ifnames269 /usr/share/autoconf269 /usr/share/autoconf269/Autom4te

Fedora Account System and Bugzilla Mismatch email

Hey, I got an email asking me to change my fedora email to match my BZ account. Problem is, in BZ I have to use my redhat account which allows me to be granted special permissions for RH-related bugs. Fedora wants to do this for the same reason, however I'd like to separate my upstream

Re: Pytest 4 in Fedora, let's get rid of it please

On 03. 03. 21 11:53, Paul Howarth wrote: On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:10:32 -0800 Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 04:40:54PM +, Paul Howarth wrote: Hi all, On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:06:40 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: Given the lack of communication from the paramiko/invoke

[Bug 1933836] perl-Sys-Virt-7.1.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933836 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Pytest 4 in Fedora, let's get rid of it please

On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:10:32 -0800 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 04:40:54PM +, Paul Howarth wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:06:40 +0100 > > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > Given the lack of communication from the paramiko/invoke > > > maintainers, I've just

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

On 3/2/21 10:21 PM, Ray Strode wrote: Hi, On Tue, Mar 2, 2021, 11:20 AM Pavel Březina wrote: Can you reiterate the problem? The snippet above don't tell me much. Sorry, let me summarize (but also see Benjamin's email). Right now, if fingerprint auth is disabled in authselect, it's not

Fedora-IoT-35-20210303.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 4/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210301.0): ID: 797599 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/797599 ID:

Re: Merging mingw specs into native spec

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:29:43AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 12:45:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 01:31:13PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > +%if %{_with_mingw} > > > + > > > +%package -n mingw32-libvirt-glib > > > +Summary:

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2021-03-03)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-03-03 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210303.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210302.0): ID: 797477 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Bug 1933868] perl-Date-Manip-6.85 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933868 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Fedora-Rawhide-20210303.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 14/187 (x86_64), 14/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: Self Introduction: Tomáš

Thank you for your offer. I'm taking over few packages from Jakub Hrozek now and he provides all the information that I need. So far so good :) Tom On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:31 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 10:40:27AM +0100, Tomas Halman wrote: > > My name is Tomáš or Tom

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Actually yes, you are right. Currently all fedora prackages are buildable with autoconf-2.69 and there is a small part (~190), which are not buildable with autoconf-2.71 (will use compat package instead). Thanks for your advice, I didn't realize this at the moment. Ondrej On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 08:25:30AM +: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:20:48AM +0100, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > Understand, starting to work on delivering autoconf-2.69 compat package. > > Have to investigate if it would be possible to install autoconf-2.69 and > >

Re: Merging mingw specs into native spec

V Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 12:45:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 01:31:13PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > +%if %{_with_mingw} > > + > > +%package -n mingw32-libvirt-glib > > +Summary: MingwGW Windows libvirt-gconfig virtualization library > > +BuildArch:

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:20:48AM +0100, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Understand, starting to work on delivering autoconf-2.69 compat package. > Have to investigate if it would be possible to install autoconf-2.69 and > autoconf-2.71 next to each other on the system. Will keep you updated. Actually, it

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Understand, starting to work on delivering autoconf-2.69 compat package. Have to investigate if it would be possible to install autoconf-2.69 and autoconf-2.71 next to each other on the system. Will keep you updated. Ondrej On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 7:35 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <

Re: Fedora 35 Change: rpmautospec - removing release and changelog fields from spec files (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:07:44AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 02. 03. 21 22:05, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > The devil is in the details: pre-release, snapinfo, minorbump aren't really > > covered by distance being just an integer bumped. > > I don't see this covered in the current method