No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210306.0):
ID: 802328 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936117
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-PDL-2.027 is available |perl-PDL-2.028 is
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/07/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210307gite9b4eb594.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905190
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Dear Maintainer,
your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 34.
Action is required from you.
If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and
Just saw java-latest-openjdk thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
On 3/6/21 5:55 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
What are the disavatages besides minecraft? Could someone retest with the
latest openjdk with minecraft and see if that is still an issue? It has been
about 7-8 years since that was an issue.
Is there some context to this question? I have
What are the disavatages besides minecraft? Could someone retest with the
latest openjdk with minecraft and see if that is still an issue? It has been
about 7-8 years since that was an issue.
Thoughts?
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933843
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933833
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933914
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hi
I'll be updating proj to 8.0.0, first in F35 in a side tag and then F34.
I'll rebuild the following dependent packages:
gdal
gdl
grass
libgeotiff
librasterlite2
libspatialite
mapnik
mapserver
merkaartor
ncl
osm2pgsql
pcl
postgis
pyproj
python-cartopy
qgis
qmapshack
R-rgdal
saga
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 07:13:07PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> People that want more security, uefi if they have only bios supported, or
> boot speed. Also no other distros have it packaged yet so also people that
> want to work on a upstream version.
But it doesn't run _in_ the distro,
Hi
I need mingw-librttopo to update mingw-libspatialite:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936125
It's a pretty trivial package. Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
People that want more security, uefi if they have only bios supported, or boot
speed. Also no other distros have it packaged yet so also people that want to
work on a upstream version.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936117
Bug ID: 1936117
Summary: perl-PDL-2.027 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PDL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 01:21:15PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 06:04:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Maybe we could make this work with some filter list. Right now there's
> > just *so* much noise. But a lot of it is repeatable. We want/need to keep
>
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 06:04:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Maybe we could make this work with some filter list. Right now there's
> just *so* much noise. But a lot of it is repeatable. We want/need to keep
> the warnings for developers, but for users, we could just show
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 12:00:39PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:25:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Once we reach the noble goal of having 0 warnings during boot by default,
> > we could just issue a notification whenever anything pops up. We do that
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:25:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Once we reach the noble goal of having 0 warnings during boot by default,
> we could just issue a notification whenever anything pops up. We do that
> for kernel oops already.
Right??? It might be worthwhile sometime
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 02:24:01AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> Should be fine but they suggest a git version.
What is the expected use case for having it packaged?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list --
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:52:22PM +0300, Alex Fails wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> My name is Alexey Gorgurov, and I would like to participate in the community
> life.
> I'm experienced mainly in C++, Qt, .net, python, etc., interested in Linux
> and have some experience in open source contributing.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 4/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210305.0):
ID: 802207 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802207
ID: 802216 Test: aarch64
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/126 (aarch64), 6/187 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210305.n.0):
ID: 802006 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802006
ID: 802009 Test: aarch64
OLD: Fedora-34-20210305.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210306.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 5
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Branched 20210306.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 5/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210305.0):
ID: 801858 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL:
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 18:28 +, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > Could you modify fprintd.service, to set G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=all[1]
> > and
> > then grab a log of that?
>
> Here's what I see from systemctl status fprintd.service:
>
> Getting authorization to perform Polkit action
>
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210305.0):
ID: 801830 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 11/187 (x86_64), 16/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
29 matches
Mail list logo
