No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 17/187 (x86_64), 16/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed i
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210315.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210316.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 20
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 178
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 16.28 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
John Reiser wrote:
> On 3/16/21, David Howells wrote:
> > John Reiser wrote:
> >
> >> See the manual page "man 2 getdents".
> > Um, which bit? I don't see anything obvious to that end.
>
> On that manual page:
> =
> The system call getdents() reads several linux_dirent structures from the
* Steven Whitehouse:
> If you are looking for a hint on how large a buffer to allocate, then
> st_blksize is generally used as a hint for directory reads, or
> otherwise, a fixed size buffer or a page or two. The st_size field is
> meaningless for directories and you'll get all kinds of odd resul
On 3/16/21 11:51 AM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 3/16/21, David Howells wrote:
>> John Reiser wrote:
>>
>>> See the manual page "man 2 getdents".
>>
>> Um, which bit? I don't see anything obvious to that end.
>
> On that manual page:
> =
> The system call getdents() reads several linux_dirent st
Hi,
On 16/03/2021 16:51, John Reiser wrote:
On 3/16/21, David Howells wrote:
John Reiser wrote:
See the manual page "man 2 getdents".
Um, which bit? I don't see anything obvious to that end.
On that manual page:
=
The system call getdents() reads several linux_dirent structures from
Am 16.03.21 um 18:03 schrieb Sumantro Mukherjee:
Hey All
Fedora 34 GNOME 40 Test Day is happening[0] on 2021-03-17 through 2021-03-19.
This is the time when we test the new features and version bumps of
all the GNOME apps which came with the mega-update.
This time, we have a lot of new changes c
Hi, it looks like Søren left Red Hat without changing his email. Does
anybody know how to contact him? I'd like to retire vino from rawhide,
which I incorrectly thought could not be done while he owns the package.
Nonresponsive maintainer bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193962
Il 16/03/21 17:50, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've realized that there's a big mismatch between the permissions that
> are necessary and the immediate impact for orphaning and retiring a
> package:
>
> orphan:
> - is reversible by single button press by anybody in "packager" gr
Hey All
Fedora 34 GNOME 40 Test Day is happening[0] on 2021-03-17 through 2021-03-19.
This is the time when we test the new features and version bumps of
all the GNOME apps which came with the mega-update.
This time, we have a lot of new changes coming along and we would
appreciate as much
testing
On 3/16/21, David Howells wrote:
John Reiser wrote:
See the manual page "man 2 getdents".
Um, which bit? I don't see anything obvious to that end.
On that manual page:
=
The system call getdents() reads several linux_dirent structures from the
directory
referred to by the open file d
Hi everybody,
I've realized that there's a big mismatch between the permissions that
are necessary and the immediate impact for orphaning and retiring a
package:
orphan:
- is reversible by single button press by anybody in "packager" group
- has no immediate effect / effect only after 6 weeks of
On ti, 16 maalis 2021, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Good Morning Everyone,
Since February 24th the packager kir has been receiving a daily email asking
them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address
in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account.
Having a bugzilla acco
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 5:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:24:47AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Takayuki Nagata:
> >
> > > I think "--with-arch=" should be "rv64g" for gcc without compressed
> > > instruction support, because the default is RV64GC[0].
> >
> > As
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:50:57PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> >> I don't know if this has happened yet, probably not. Otherwise we'd be
> >> building this ABI variant regularly (like all the other targets).
> >
> > We don't intend to build this for Fedora, as there'
* Richard W. M. Jones:
>> I don't know if this has happened yet, probably not. Otherwise we'd be
>> building this ABI variant regularly (like all the other targets).
>
> We don't intend to build this for Fedora, as there's only one
> processor which doesn't support this extension, and we don't ev
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:34:07PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:24:47AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Takayuki Nagata:
> >>
> >> > I think "--with-arch=" should be "rv64g" for gcc without compressed
> >> > instruction support, becaus
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/187 (x86_64), 11/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210315.n.0):
ID: 816528 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/816528
ID: 816562 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-i
Good Morning Everyone,
Since February 24th the packager kir has been receiving a daily email asking
them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address
in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account.
Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wik
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:24:47AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Takayuki Nagata:
>>
>> > I think "--with-arch=" should be "rv64g" for gcc without compressed
>> > instruction support, because the default is RV64GC[0].
>>
>> As far as I understand it, there is no glib
(As Peter said, please don't send the same email twice.)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:20:22AM -, Billa Surendra wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> From last 10 days I am struggling to rebuilding gcc-10.2.1-9.fc33.src.rpm
> SRPM on RISC-V Fedora image. Here I am planning to rebuilt this SRPM without
> c
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:24:47AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Takayuki Nagata:
>
> > I think "--with-arch=" should be "rv64g" for gcc without compressed
> > instruction support, because the default is RV64GC[0].
>
> As far as I understand it, there is no glibc port for RISC-V without
> comp
Hello Henrik,
I do use radare2 on both EPEL7 and EPEL8 ... I will be happy to co-maintain
if you need a hand there.
I have to admit I am terrible with reading devel mail lists so direct mail
works better with me.
>The question is then what should be done with the stale and known broken
EPEL bra
OLD: Fedora-34-20210315.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210316.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 6
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 22:29:39 +0900
Takayuki Nagata wrote:
> Hi Billa,
>
> I am not sure if compressed instruction support can be disabled, but
> it appears to me that --with-arch= should be rv32gc or rv64gc for
> multilib. It is implemented in the gcc/config.gcc file.
>
> Florian mentioned that
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:23:01AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > setting up rsync for this point will be a difficult problem and may need to
> > be delayed for a long time.
> >
> > 1. ELN recomposes every 3-4 hours. The /srv/odcs
Hi Billa,
I am not sure if compressed instruction support can be disabled, but
it appears to me that --with-arch= should be rv32gc or rv64gc for
multilib. It is implemented in the gcc/config.gcc file.
Florian mentioned that there is no glibc without compressed
instruction support. Perhaps, gcc po
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Branched 20210316.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
I thought new thread can get more attention from members. sorry for that.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/e
You basically just sent this same mail in reply to another thread you
started, why are you doing that?
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:23 AM Billa Surendra
wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> From last 10 days I am struggling to rebuilding gcc-10.2.1-9.fc33.src.rpm
> SRPM on RISC-V Fedora image. Here I am pla
Dear all,
From last 10 days I am struggling to rebuilding gcc-10.2.1-9.fc33.src.rpm
SRPM on RISC-V Fedora image. Here I am planning to rebuilt this SRPM without
compressed instruction support. Following changed I have done on gcc.spec file.
%ifarch riscv64
--with-arch=rv64g --with-ab
Dear all,
From last 10 days I am struggling to rebuilding gcc-10.2.1-9.fc33.src.rpm
SRPM on RISC-V Fedora image. Here I am planning to rebuilt this SRPM without
compressed instruction support. Following changed I have done on gcc.spec file.
%ifarch riscv64
--with-arch=rv64g --with-ab
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210315.0):
ID: 816372 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 3/10/21 6:58 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Hi all,
I put some comments on the OpenSSH mailing list[1] about UpdateHostKeys
and other SHA-1 related changes.
The OpenSSH release notes simply tell people to update OpenSSH. In
practice, people who use distributions like Fedora, RHEL and CentOS are
John Reiser wrote:
> See the manual page "man 2 getdents".
Um, which bit? I don't see anything obvious to that end.
On AFS directories are handled as files that the filesystem downloads and
parses locally. The size returned in st_size is the size of the directory
content blob.
David
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210315.0):
ID: 816148 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hello everyone,
Please find the logs for yesterday’s meeting below. We will meet again in 2
weeks.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/neurofedora/neurofedora.2021-03-15-13.00.html
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/neurofedora/neurofedora.2021-03-15-13.00.log.html
Min
Hello everyone,
Please find the logs for yesterday’s meeting below. We will meet again in 2
weeks.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/neurofedora/neurofedora.2021-03-15-13.00.html
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/neurofedora/neurofedora.2021-03-15-13.00.log.html
Mi
38 matches
Mail list logo
