The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-04cc5bcb08
nagios-4.4.6-4.el7
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-780cd884ad
cabextract-1.9-7.el7
10
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 18:53, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'll be updating proj to 8.0.0, first in F35 in a side tag and then F34.
>
> I'll rebuild the following dependent packages:
>
> gdal
> gdl
> grass
> libgeotiff
> librasterlite2
> libspatialite
> mapnik
> mapserver
> merkaartor
> ncl
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934690
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941071
Bug ID: 1941071
Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural
Keywords:
Sorry, I missed the mail. I have rebuild bout++ now
On 3/19/21 12:21 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> This update is still pending.
>
> On 24/02/21 20:07, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
>> Side-tag is ready for building the related dependencies:
>> f35-build-side-37890
>>
>> On 22/02/21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938614
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938401
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926925
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929205
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936221
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-411281d4f8 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933852
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6d722c0083 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-95cae9f155 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936048
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935378
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-a9a79d99f2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933868
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-ccb745c82e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933502
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934759
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933477
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-faed82bb3c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914227
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-2a909b87d2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932390
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-5a096a1b32 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932000
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-1c0d2f1002 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890595
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-473e880567 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-0081fafdec has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-1d72d8cea2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Reduce_dependencies_on_python3-setuptools
== Summary ==
We'll do two things to reduce the number of Python packages
unnecessarily Requiring python3-setuptools:
# python3-devel will no longer Require python3-setuptools
# packages with
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Reduce_dependencies_on_python3-setuptools
== Summary ==
We'll do two things to reduce the number of Python packages
unnecessarily Requiring python3-setuptools:
# python3-devel will no longer Require python3-setuptools
# packages with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890590
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890793
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932000
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-NoBreakpoints-0.1 |perl-Test-NoBreakpoints-0.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920120
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.47 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.47
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908112
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907739
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/187 (x86_64), 10/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210318.n.0):
ID: 821833 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821833
ID: 821923 Test: aarch64
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 22/126 (aarch64), 12/187 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210318.n.0):
ID: 821532 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz
With F34 Beta declared GO, it's time to switch focus to Final. As a
reminder, the Final freeze begins on 6 April, with a preferred target
date of 20 April.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. anaconda — kbd-legacy missing from installs which need keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933868
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933852
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Codes-3.67-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.67-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932390
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933477
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-473e880567 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-473e880567
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99-1. |perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914227
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 16:35 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> With the current way of things (that could possibly change), when
> EPEL 10 is
> created, ELN is long gone in the RHEL 11 world.
>
> I could only imagine this scheme:
>
> ELN -> CentOS Stream N -> RHEL N
> ELN Extra -> EPEL N
I'd advocate strongly against a compat package.
The whole point of the change is to push the move to the new autoconf
upstream release. Not the availability of autoconf 2.71 to the end user.
For that, we would do much better with providing the end users with a
modular release, I think.
As for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-1d72d8cea2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1d72d8cea2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210315.0):
ID: 822081 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822081
ID: 822097 Test: aarch64
Background
For the last 12 + months, the Community Platform Engineering team have
been developing a new service to replace the current FAS2 application
for the Fedora Account System.
The FAS2 application was written over 10 years ago with python2 and
TurboGears1 framework. Due to its
Background
For the last 12 + months, the Community Platform Engineering team have
been developing a new service to replace the current FAS2 application
for the Fedora Account System.
The FAS2 application was written over 10 years ago with python2 and
TurboGears1 framework. Due to its
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-70a78ade08 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-70a78ade08
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/9
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934823
Bug 1934823 depends on bug 1934824, which changed state.
Bug 1934824 Summary: CVE-2020-28591 slic3r: Out-of-bounds read in
AMFParserContext::endElement() [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934824
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Eduard Lucena kirjoitti 19.3.2021 klo 16.57:
I'm not a proven packager, but I'm interested in clipit.
Is possible for me to take it?
You do not need to be a proven packager to adopt a package, being a
"normal" packager is enough. In that case you just click a button at
package's src.fp.o
OLD: Fedora-34-20210318.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210319.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:7.17 MiB
Size
On 19. 03. 21 16:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:22 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
that either is only in Fedora,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:22 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
> > > that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
> > that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
> > in Fedora and not ELN.
>
> I am not sure I
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/7
___
perl-devel mailing list --
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/6
___
perl-devel mailing list --
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list --
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following:
``
Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/9
___
perl-devel mailing list --
churchyard closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `slic3r`
that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/8
___
perl-devel mailing list --
I'm not a proven packager, but I'm interested in clipit.
Is possible for me to take it?
El vie, 19 mar 2021 a las 5:19, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski (<
domi...@greysector.net>) escribió:
> On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 20:44, Michael Šimáček wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Due to lack of time and
On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
in Fedora and not ELN.
I am not sure I underrated this problem entirely.
I thought ELN is used as an additional
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210318.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210319.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 76
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.43 MiB
Size of dropped packages:7.67
All,
Fedora infrastructure is getting a new accounts system! To put this in
place we will need an outage to our services.
There will be an outage starting at 2021-03-25 10:30UTC,
which will last approximately *TWO* days.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
All,
Fedora infrastructure is getting a new accounts system! To put this in
place we will need an outage to our services.
There will be an outage starting at 2021-03-25 10:30UTC,
which will last approximately *TWO* days.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:25 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> I'm sending this out now so I don't have to say all this in this
> week's ELN meeting.
>
> Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
> that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
> in Fedora
I'm sending this out now so I don't have to say all this in this
week's ELN meeting.
Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
in Fedora and not ELN.
Solution: Create ELN Extra for those extra
Hi all.
This update is still pending.
On 24/02/21 20:07, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
Side-tag is ready for building the related dependencies:
f35-build-side-37890
On 22/02/21 19:13, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
Hi all.
'sundials-5.7.0' is coming in Rawhide branch.
Is reasonable pushing it in
zdohnal opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Font-AFM` that you
are following:
``
use NimbusSans-Bold font in test instead of phvr
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/3
___
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210318.0):
ID: 821230 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
zdohnal closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Font-AFM` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Use NimbusSans-Bold font for afm font metrics testing
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/1
zdohnal commented on the pull-request: `Use NimbusSans-Bold font for afm font
metrics testing` that you are following:
``
Creating a new PR.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/1
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-749331f4de has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-749331f4de
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-a9a79d99f2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a9a79d99f2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-0081fafdec has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0081fafdec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 20:44, Michael Šimáček wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to lack of time and motivation I've just orphaned the following
> packages which are now free to take:
> pasystray
I would've taken pasystray as I use it, but it seems Yaakov beat me
to it.
Yaakov, would you consider
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you
are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210318.0):
ID: 821216 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/19/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210319git72726e42b.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
92 matches
Mail list logo
