Hi,
After input my FAS accout and password, I got this error message.
=
500 Internal Server Error
Could not convert return value of the view callable function
pyramid_fas_openid.view.verify_openid into a response object. The value
returned was None. You may
Hi Jeff,
This is a public mailing list - if you no longer wish to receive these mail,
you should unsubscribe:
"To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org "
> On 2 Apr 2021, at 22:13, Jeff Gentry wrote:
>
> Reviewed what?? I don’t know who you are .
>
> Jeff
Updates are now in flight for kst, libASL, openmeeg, and vips, for f34 and f33.
gtatool is retired and FTBFS, so I left it alone.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with
Hi all,
Tomorrow, April 6th 2020, is an important day on the Fedora 34
schedule [1], with significant cut-offs.
Tomorrow we have the Final Freeze [2] which starts at 14:00 UTC. This
means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze
exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable'
Hi all,
Tomorrow, April 6th 2020, is an important day on the Fedora 34
schedule [1], with significant cut-offs.
Tomorrow we have the Final Freeze [2] which starts at 14:00 UTC. This
means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze
exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable'
Hey All,
There is a recent proposal to replace the PulseAudio daemon with a
functionally compatible implementation based on PipeWire[0].
This means that all existing clients using the PulseAudio client
library will continue to work as before, as well as applications
shipped as Flatpak.
The test
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 12:12 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 11:43 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, 6:28 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:19 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:40 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
Hey All,
As we come closer to Fedora 34 release dates, it's time to test upgrades.
Fedora 34 has a lot of changesets [0] and it becomes essential that we
test the graphical upgrade methods as well as the command line.
As a part of this test day[1], we will test upgrading from a full
updated, F32
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/37 (x86_64)
ID: 843419 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/843419
ID: 843423 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL:
On 4/3/21 02:34, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Dnia Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:30:30PM -0400, Neal Gompa napisał(a):
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:18 PM Lars Seipel wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:36:48PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
Unless OpenShift and RKE recently changed so that containers can run
as root
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 11:43 AM Chris Murphy
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, 6:28 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:19 PM Chris Murphy
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:40 AM Richard Shaw
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > It should be possible, however, to mark the images
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/189 (x86_64), 7/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210404.n.1):
ID: 843049 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/843049
ID: 843055 Test: x86_64
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 12/189 (x86_64), 25/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, 6:28 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:19 PM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:40 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> > It should be possible, however, to mark the images folder +C even if it
>> wouldn't affect existing images.
>>
>> It is.
>>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Erlang_24
== Summary ==
Update Erlang/OTP to version 24.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Peter|Peter Lemenkov]], [[SIGs/Erlang|Fedora Erlang
SIG]], [[User:bowlofeggs|Randy Barlow]], [[User:jcline|Jeremy Cline]]
* Email: lemen...@gmail.com,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Erlang_24
== Summary ==
Update Erlang/OTP to version 24.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Peter|Peter Lemenkov]], [[SIGs/Erlang|Fedora Erlang
SIG]], [[User:bowlofeggs|Randy Barlow]], [[User:jcline|Jeremy Cline]]
* Email: lemen...@gmail.com,
OLD: Fedora-34-20210404.n.1
NEW: Fedora-34-20210405.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 195
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 30.34 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 10/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210404.0):
ID: 842977 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210404.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210405.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 22
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.14 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
My apologies; 1.5.18 fixes a few CVEs, and the subsequent releases fixed
regressions. I'm usually much more scrupulous about soname changes. I've added
versioning to the solib's %files line in the spec, and will take care of the
broken packages.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:19 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:40 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > It should be possible, however, to mark the images folder +C even if it
> wouldn't affect existing images.
>
> It is.
>
What I meant, is that it could be marked +C even for existing
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210404.0):
ID: 842585 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/842585
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210403.0):
ID: 842560 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
23 matches
Mail list logo
