> Am 01.06.21 um 14:15 schrieb xiaofeng:
>
> Would you mind explaining a bit what part you are struggeling with?
>
> Having a first PR is great! Actually if the maintainer of qt-creator is
> responsive you could work quite a while without the need of getting sponsored.
> (If possible, just
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-58bc048b1a
upx-3.96-9.el8
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a20d7c1ddd
rxvt-unicode-9.26-1.el8
9
On Mon, 2021-05-31 at 15:19 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 28.05.2021 um 23:08 schrieb Chris Murphy <
> > li...@colorremedies.com>:
> >
> > > ……
> >
> > All I mean by this is to push back on the idea that the proposal
> > for
> > Cloud translates into delaying the decision for Server by
Hey all, I’m trying to build my package for EPEL and got a strange error
clang-11: error: argument unused during compilation:
'-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1'
[-Werror,-Wunused-command-line-argument]
clang-11: error: argument unused during compilation:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838000
--- Comment #28 from errata-xmlrpc ---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Extended Update Support
Via RHSA-2021:2184 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2184
--
You are
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:34 PM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> >
> > Hans de Goede kirjoitti 1.6.2021 klo 21.02:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 6/1/21 6:20 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > >> Hello all.
> > >>
> > >> doxbox-staging is trying to
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:22 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:06 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:49 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > >
> > > CentOS has not yet released 8.4.
> >
> > Is there any reason to think there will ever be one? I'm staring at
> >
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:24 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, what will EPEL be built on going forward, if CentOS fades
> away and CentOS Stream takes its place?
>
EPEL has been and always will be built on Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
The EPEL-Next initiative will allow for reconciling
Oh, so, wait, when doing an EPEL build, is it against CentOS or RHEL? Honestly
I always thought CentOS was the image being using by Koji for rpm builds.
On 1 Jun 2021, at 15:49, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> CentOS has not yet released 8.4.
>
> On 6/1/21 2:45 PM, Ron Olson wrote:
>> Hm, maybe it’s
Out of curiosity, what will EPEL be built on going forward, if CentOS fades
away and CentOS Stream takes its place?
On 1 Jun 2021, at 17:21, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:06 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:49 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>
>>> CentOS
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:06 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:49 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > CentOS has not yet released 8.4.
>
> Is there any reason to think there will ever be one? I'm staring at
> the announcement of CentOS 8 Stream at
>
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:49 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> CentOS has not yet released 8.4.
Is there any reason to think there will ever be one? I'm staring at
the announcement of CentOS 8 Stream at
https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/ , and I don't
see any hint that 8.4 will
Hey folks! Just a heads up that I renamed the default branch on several
projects (most of the ones I'm the owner/main contributor to) to
'main'. If you have a checkout of any of them you'll want to 'git
checkout main', and base pull requests off that branch in future.
I didn't do
CentOS has not yet released 8.4.
On 6/1/21 2:45 PM, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hm, maybe it’s still rolling out? I fired up a new centos container and got:
>
>
> [root@4c38ec50ea30 /]# more /etc/os-release
> NAME="CentOS Linux"
> VERSION="8"
> ID="centos"
> ID_LIKE="rhel fedora"
>
Hm, maybe it’s still rolling out? I fired up a new centos container and got:
[root@4c38ec50ea30 /]# more /etc/os-release
NAME="CentOS Linux"
VERSION="8"
ID="centos"
ID_LIKE="rhel fedora"
VERSION_ID="8"
PLATFORM_ID="platform:el8"
PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 8"
ANSI_COLOR="0;31"
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:34 PM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> Hans de Goede kirjoitti 1.6.2021 klo 21.02:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 6/1/21 6:20 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> >> Hello all.
> >>
> >> doxbox-staging is trying to overwrite the regular dosbox package:
> >>
> >> Installing:
> >>
Hans de Goede kirjoitti 1.6.2021 klo 21.02:
Hi,
On 6/1/21 6:20 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
Hello all.
doxbox-staging is trying to overwrite the regular dosbox package:
Installing:
dosbox-staging x86_64 0.76.0-2.fc34 fedora
1.4 M
replacing
On 5/25/21 7:29 AM, Major Hayden wrote:
1) Should I make separate Fedora packages/specs for each CLI
component and the SDK components? The SDK components look
nearly identical from a packaging standpoint (no executables
there, just libraries in each). If so, that would be
Hi Kamil,
On Tuesday, 2021-06-01 10:38:40 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I'd still prefer if I didn't have to register an IRC nick and didn't need
> to communicate with Appservice and NickServ (I just wish to forget about
> IRC completely), hopefully that will be possible in the future.
Doubtful.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/42 (x86_64)
ID: 900280 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/900280
ID: 900293 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/900293
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-06-02 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
> Evaluation meeting
>
> More information
Hi,
On 6/1/21 6:20 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> doxbox-staging is trying to overwrite the regular dosbox package:
>
> Installing:
> dosbox-staging x86_64 0.76.0-2.fc34 fedora
> 1.4 M
> replacing dosbox.x86_64 0.74.3-7.fc34
>
>
On 5/9/21 1:32 AM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> I may be hair-brained to do this, but I've put together an installer for
> Fedora on WSL.
>
> It mostly follows the procedures that had been much talked about in a
> blog post about running Fedora 33 in the WSL2, but it uses the direct
> installer rather
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 08:29:17AM -0400, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> I have opened a bugzilla to get an EPEL8 branch for pdsh [1], and I've also
> reached out to the current maintainers directly and have not heard anything
> back. I am not sure what the next steps are in getting an EPEL8 build of
>
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 06:26 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Adam Williamson writes:
>
> > [...]
> > But some other channels that are not Fedora channels, but which a lot
> > of Fedora people are interested in, decided to move, or at least to
> > tell people that they also had a channel on the
Hello all.
doxbox-staging is trying to overwrite the regular dosbox package:
Installing:
dosbox-stagingx86_640.76.0-2.fc34
fedora1.4 M
replacing dosbox.x86_64 0.74.3-7.fc34
From its SPEC[1]:
# This package is a drop-in replacement for dosbox
Hi everyone,
The F35 Change proposal deadlines are coming up:
* 2021-06-23 — Change submission deadline (Changes requiring
infrastructure changes)
* 2021-06-29 — Change submission deadline (System-Wide Changes,
Changes requiring mass rebuild)
* 2021-07-20 — Change submission deadline
Hi everyone,
The F35 Change proposal deadlines are coming up:
* 2021-06-23 — Change submission deadline (Changes requiring
infrastructure changes)
* 2021-06-29 — Change submission deadline (System-Wide Changes,
Changes requiring mass rebuild)
* 2021-07-20 — Change submission deadline
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-06-02 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-06-02 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
Am 01.06.21 um 14:15 schrieb xiaofeng:
Actually, I just have trouble following the guide.
Would you mind explaining a bit what part you are struggeling with?
Having a first PR is great! Actually if the maintainer of qt-creator is
responsive you could work quite a while without the need of
On 6/1/21 4:20 PM, xiaofeng wrote:
Could anyone please kindly sponsor me?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list --
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:38 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InstallGPTwithKickstart
>
This proposal has been withdrawn by the owner.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Hi,
Could anyone please kindly sponsor me?
I have made my first PR here at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt-creator/pull-request/5
Thanks.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:26 PM xiaofeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 8:15 PM xiaofeng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:00
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 8:15 PM xiaofeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:00 PM Qiyu Yan wrote:
>
>> 在 2021-06-01星期二的 16:18 +0800，xiaofeng写道：
>> > Hi, all,
>> >
>> > My name is Xiaofeng, I am using Fedora for the first time since Fedora
>> > 13. Currently I work on RHEL like
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 05:17:43PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
Just a heads-up, texlive-base (where the compiled code and immediate
dependencies lives) and texlive (where the thousands of other noarch
components live) have been updated to TeXLive 2021 in Rawhide (and the
latest available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267962
Ondrej Soukup changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||osou...@redhat.com
--
You are
I have opened a bugzilla to get an EPEL8 branch for pdsh [1], and I've also
reached out to the current maintainers directly and have not heard anything
back. I am not sure what the next steps are in getting an EPEL8 build of
pdsh. I would be happy to become the maintainer of the EPEL builds for
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:00 PM Qiyu Yan wrote:
> 在 2021-06-01星期二的 16:18 +0800，xiaofeng写道：
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > My name is Xiaofeng, I am using Fedora for the first time since Fedora
> > 13. Currently I work on RHEL like distributions for C++ development, I
> > am willing to join the fedora
在 2021-06-01星期二的 16:18 +0800，xiaofeng写道：
> Hi, all,
>
> My name is Xiaofeng, I am using Fedora for the first time since Fedora
> 13. Currently I work on RHEL like distributions for C++ development, I
> am willing to join the fedora packager group, especially the epel
> group.
Welcome! You can
Adam Williamson writes:
> [...]
> But some other channels that are not Fedora channels, but which a lot
> of Fedora people are interested in, decided to move, or at least to
> tell people that they also had a channel on the new network. Then
> Freenode peremptorily took over those channels for
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 10:14, Richard Fearn wrote:
>
> > Note that your queries did not check for BuildRequires, since you did
> > not enable the foo-source repositories.
> > That would require "--enablerepo fedora-source --enablerepo
> > updates-source", or "--enablerepo rawhide-source" on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1966355
Jan Pazdziora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
> Note that your queries did not check for BuildRequires, since you did
> not enable the foo-source repositories.
> That would require "--enablerepo fedora-source --enablerepo
> updates-source", or "--enablerepo rawhide-source" on rawhide.
Thanks Fabio - I knew I would get something wrong with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853802
--- Comment #3 from Mauro Carvalho Chehab ---
Created attachment 1788436
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1788436=edit
Fix truetype support on Perl Tk
The bug is still present on Fedora 34, and the fix I submitted at:
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:55 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> > If I intend to use Matrix exclusively, do I still need to register on
> libera.chat, in order to participate in Fedora rooms?
>
> I think if you want to show up on the IRC side with your expected IRC
> nick (for example, for IRC
Hi, all,
My name is Xiaofeng, I am using Fedora for the first time since Fedora 13.
Currently I work on RHEL like distributions for C++ development, I am
willing to join the fedora packager group, especially the epel group.
By now, I want to co-maintain the qt-creator for epel8, it does not work
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 08:23:40AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 06:47:28PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > Hi Richard
> >
> > Apparently I need a newer openssl to build mingw-python3-3.9.5. Do
> > you have any time to look into updating to mingw-openssl-1.1.1k? I'm
> >
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:44 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> > Maybe it helps in Element Web, Settings, Preferences, to deactivate
> > "Show join/leave messages (invites/kicks/bans unaffected)"
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but I already had that setting turned off for
> months.
>
> Weirdly
On Mon, 31 May 2021 14:28:58 -0500 astoundingly, Justin Forbes
wrote:
> Third party drivers often can break on kernel rebases.
Thanks Justin!
Though all worked fine for quite a while, after your posting I removed the
amdgpu package, installed the testing kernel just for giggles, and
Hi guys,
later today I will be rebasing the expat library to version 2.4.1.
This update should not change API in any way, but still i want to give you
a heads up.
In case you encounter any issue, please let me know.
Sincerely, tkorbar.
___
devel mailing
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210530.0):
ID: 899750 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 01. 06. 21 5:42, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 1:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 17. 05. 21 21:57, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Hello,
Next week I'm going to update package hamcrest in Fedora rawhide from
version 1.3 to version 2.2.
The proposed update contains an API change
I agree. Thing is they seem to use EPEL as-it with priorities set in all
the repos. Think I'll discuss it further with Amazon.
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 08:38, Manuel Wolfshant
wrote:
> On 6/1/21 8:21 AM, Danie de Jager wrote:
> > It was trivial to compile from src RPM I was just wondering in this
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 06:47:28PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi Richard
>
> Apparently I need a newer openssl to build mingw-python3-3.9.5. Do
> you have any time to look into updating to mingw-openssl-1.1.1k? I'm
> not really familiar with the situation of all downstream patches to
> be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965838
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On 01/06/2021 05:42, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 1:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
[...]
Seems like the configure script (or whatever that is) fails to find hamcrest.
That's because libreoffice hardcodes path to hamcrest JAR in the
configure script, instead of using one of the
On 6/1/21 8:21 AM, Danie de Jager wrote:
It was trivial to compile from src RPM I was just wondering in this scenario,
should Amazon compile rpmconf and add this package to their base? Or is there
something else I'm not considering?
I'd say it's up to Amazon to include the package in their
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965838
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
59 matches
Mail list logo
