[rpms/perl-XML-Simple] PR #1: Package tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-Simple` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Simple/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[EPEL-devel] Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 07:27:52PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 08. 07. 21 16:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 29. 06. 21 8:28, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > > > > > Am 28.06.21 um 21:44 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > > > > The semantics is quite simple: > > > > > > > > > > > > %check > > > >

Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 07:27:52PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 08. 07. 21 16:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 29. 06. 21 8:28, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > > > > > Am 28.06.21 um 21:44 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > > > > The semantics is quite simple: > > > > > > > > > > > > %check > > > >

Re: Font Awesome version 5

Hello Jerry, On 8/4/21 3:57 PM, Jerry James wrote: Am I stepping on your toes with this? That is, had you already started working on a v5 package? I don't want to get in your way if so. On the other hand, if you haven't, would you like to comaintain the one I'm working on? No, I haven't,

Re: F35 Change: Memory Constraints macros for RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 04:25:13PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros > > == Summary == > Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's > [https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints > memory-constraints]), for

Re: F35 Change: Memory Constraints macros for RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 08:54:11AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 04:25:13PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros > > > > == Summary == > > Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's > >

[Bug 1879100] Please build an EPEL8 build for perl-File-Find-Rule-Age

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879100 Tim Orling changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Doc Type|---

Retired perl-File-Find-Rule-Age

This package has not seen any attention upstream for 7 years and keeps having random FTBFS due to the tests. As nothing depends on this and I no longer need it in my own workflow, let us send it out to pasture. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399506

Retired perl-File-Find-Rule-Age

This package has not seen any attention upstream for 7 years and keeps having random FTBFS due to the tests. As nothing depends on this and I no longer need it in my own workflow, let us send it out to pasture. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399506

[Bug 1399506] perl-File-Find-Rule-Age-0.302-5.fc26 FTBFS randomly

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399506 Tim Orling changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 07:27:52PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 08. 07. 21 16:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 29. 06. 21 8:28, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > > > > > Am 28.06.21 um 21:44 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > > > > The semantics is quite simple: > > > > > > > > > > > > %check > > > >

[Bug 1989200] perl-Log-Any-1.710 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989200 Tim Orling changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1989200] perl-Log-Any-1.710 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989200 Tim Orling changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Doc Type|---

Re: Font Awesome version 5

Hello Nico, On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 7:45 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > How sensible! This is how packages should be named, consistently and > simply. Unfortunately, the package does not match the name of the > tarball, nor of the tarballs over at pypi.org. Why not simply use the > pypi.org tarall

Re: Font Awesome version 5

Hello Aleksei, On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 4:23 PM Aleksei Bavshin wrote: > 4 and 5 (and 6) are not backward compatible. Glyphs are missing, > replaced, changed codepoints, etc... Not all things could be ported and > I don't believe we'll ever get rid of 4. It's good to have confirmation of the lack

HEADS UP: Python 3.10.0rc1 in Rawhide

Hello, we have just updated Python in Rawhide to 3.10.0rc1. There are a few changes since beta4. Let us know if you encounter trouble you need any help with. https://docs.python.org/3.10/whatsnew/changelog.html#python-3-10-0-release-candidate-1 Python 3.10.0 is almost finished. This release,

HEADS UP: Python 3.10.0rc1 in Rawhide

Hello, we have just updated Python in Rawhide to 3.10.0rc1. There are a few changes since beta4. Let us know if you encounter trouble you need any help with. https://docs.python.org/3.10/whatsnew/changelog.html#python-3-10-0-release-candidate-1 Python 3.10.0 is almost finished. This release,

Re: KOJI armv7hl builders out of resources

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 6:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hopefully it fixes the community-mysql issue? Yes, I got a successful build on the first try without touching the Rawhide code. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=73279974 Thank you very much for your help, Kevin ! Michal

Re: IceCat build error: no matching function for call to ‘ArrayEnd(uint8_t [])’

Thank you Bruno. We'll need an updated patch therefore. On 8/4/21 7:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 05:08:40 -0500,  Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:51:41 +0200, "Antonio T. sagitter" wrote: Hi all. I need help for failed builds of IceCat bacause

Re: Flagged projects in Anitya

On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 19:51, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > Thank you for bringing this up. > The flags are processed by admins of Anitya. > > I have just processed your ones. Thanks Mikolaj! Richard -- Richard Fearn richardfe...@gmail.com ___ devel

Re: IceCat build error: no matching function for call to ‘ArrayEnd(uint8_t [])’

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 05:08:40 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:51:41 +0200, "Antonio T. sagitter" wrote: Hi all. I need help for failed builds of IceCat bacause of this error (in x86_64 and i386 architectures only): Thanks for working on that. The last good

Re: KOJI armv7hl builders out of resources

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 08:50:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Yes, stupidly they updated to the normal kernel before the last reboot. > So, they only see 3GB of their 40GB memory. :( > > I'll fix and reboot them today. I have no idea why this wasn't seen > before now. I guess it shows that

Re: Problem with Python 3.10 and python-wxpython4 in Rawhide

On Wed, 4 Aug 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote: I decided to file a bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988466 I also saw a similar issue and added a comment here: https://github.com/wxWidgets/Phoenix/issues/1963 Yeah, I'll try to look into it later today. In case anyone

Re: how to update ssh public key

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 03:14:52PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 04/08/2021 09:58, Xiao Ni wrote: > > So I used thehttps://accounts.fedoraproject.org/ to update > > my public key. > > You need to wait 2-6 hours until your new key with propagated between > servers. This should not

Re: Problem with Python 3.10 and python-wxpython4 in Rawhide

On 8/4/21 9:42 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Scott Talbert wrote: On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote: I decided to file a bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988466 I also saw a similar issue and added a comment here:

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 10:27:10AM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > Hi Zbyszek, > > thanks for your comment. Wouldn't it be much clearer instead of turning > bind eye on the issue creating noarch systemd-filesystem subpackage, > which would own: > > %files filesystem > %dir %_unitdir > %dir

[rpms/perl-XML-Simple] PR #1: Package tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-Simple` that you are following: `` Package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Simple/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Problem with Python 3.10 and python-wxpython4 in Rawhide

On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Scott Talbert wrote: On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote: I decided to file a bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988466 I also saw a similar issue and added a comment here: https://github.com/wxWidgets/Phoenix/issues/1963 Yeah, I'll try to

Re: Easy way to temporarily change smp_mflags in mock or fedpkg mockbuild?

On 8/4/21 4:11 PM, Benjamin Beasley wrote: These should work: fedpkg mockbuild -- --define='_smp_mflags -j1' fedpkg mockbuild -- -D '_smp_mflags -j1' mock -r foo --rebuild bar.src..rpm --define='_smp_mflags -j1' mock -r foo --rebuild bar.src..rpm -D '_smp_mflags -j1' As the case is OOM

Re: Easy way to temporarily change smp_mflags in mock or fedpkg mockbuild?

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 8:11 AM Benjamin Beasley wrote: > These should work: > > fedpkg mockbuild -- --define='_smp_mflags -j1' > fedpkg mockbuild -- -D '_smp_mflags -j1' > > mock -r foo --rebuild bar.src..rpm --define='_smp_mflags -j1' > mock -r foo --rebuild bar.src..rpm -D '_smp_mflags -j1' >

Re: how to update ssh public key

On 04/08/2021 09:58, Xiao Ni wrote: So I used thehttps://accounts.fedoraproject.org/ to update my public key. You need to wait 2-6 hours until your new key with propagated between servers. But https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ doesn't update the public key. The old system is read-only.

Re: Easy way to temporarily change smp_mflags in mock or fedpkg mockbuild?

These should work: fedpkg mockbuild -- --define='_smp_mflags -j1' fedpkg mockbuild -- -D '_smp_mflags -j1' mock -r foo --rebuild bar.src..rpm --define='_smp_mflags -j1' mock -r foo --rebuild bar.src..rpm -D '_smp_mflags -j1' ___ devel mailing list --

Fedora-Rawhide-20210804.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING:

Easy way to temporarily change smp_mflags in mock or fedpkg mockbuild?

I've finally hit a couple of packages that OOM during build with my 16GB memory, even if I dropped out of graphical and tried from the console. I'm assuming it's the linking so I would have to drop them considerably, but I don't want to muck around with my ~/.rpmmacros or mock configs. Is there

Re: should leveldb have had an soname bump, and the associated notice?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:54 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kaleb Keithley: > > > ah, I missed that. I looked, but not hard enough apparently, and I > presumed it was related > > to changes in the code. > > > > > > > > but I expect upstream does

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

On 04. 08. 21 0:16, Sahana Prasad wrote: Hi Ben, others I would like to defer it to F36. Thanks for the confirmation. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 6:17 PM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > I would like to defer it to F36. OpenSSL 3.0 Beta2 (or Beta 3, if available) > will land > into rawhide right after branching. This will give fellow maintainers time to > properly plan > porting activities and ensure smooth transition. >

Re: how to update ssh public key

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 15:58:11 +0800, Xiao Ni wrote: > Hi all > > I've changed a new machine. So it needs to do a config before working > on it. A new ssh rsa key is generated. I want to update it to FAS. It > says "FAS2 is deprecated, and currently in read-only mode. Use Fedora > Accounts to

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210804.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210803.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210804.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 154 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 12.09 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: PSA: gtk-rs 0.14 updates landing in rawhide later this week

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:41 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Over the past few days, I've been working on getting the gtk-rs stack updated > to the latest versions. This includes the Rust bindings for GLib, GTK, > GStreamer, WebKit2GTK, some other GNOME / GObject libraries, and two apps, >

[Test-Announce] Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210804.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210804.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: IceCat build error: no matching function for call to ‘ArrayEnd(uint8_t [])’

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:51:41 +0200, "Antonio T. sagitter" wrote: Hi all. I need help for failed builds of IceCat bacause of this error (in x86_64 and i386 architectures only): Thanks for working on that. The last good icecat in rawhide doesn't work with the latest glibc. Because I use

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210804.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210803.0): ID: 940840 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Bug 1989862] New: perl-enum-1.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989862 Bug ID: 1989862 Summary: perl-enum-1.12 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-enum Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1989862] perl-enum-1.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989862 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Unable to resolve the hostname for one of the package's Source URLs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1987801] perl-POE: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f35

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987801 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

Hi Zbyszek, thanks for your comment. Wouldn't it be much clearer instead of turning bind eye on the issue creating noarch systemd-filesystem subpackage, which would own: %files filesystem %dir %_unitdir %dir %_userunitdir %dir %_tmpfilesdir %dir %_sysusersdir and systemd would just contain

how to update ssh public key

Hi all I've changed a new machine. So it needs to do a config before working on it. A new ssh rsa key is generated. I want to update it to FAS. It says "FAS2 is deprecated, and currently in read-only mode. Use Fedora Accounts to create or manage your Fedora contributor account" on the webpage. So

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210804.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210803.0): ID: 940782 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Bug 1989628] perl-Coro-Multicore-1.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989628 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1989628] perl-Coro-Multicore-1.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989628 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Coro-Multicore-1.07-1.

[rpms/perl-Coro-Multicore] PR #1: Tests

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Coro-Multicore` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Coro-Multicore/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1989766] perl-PDL-2.055 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989766 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Fixed

[Bug 1989513] perl-Test-NoWarnings-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989513 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version|