Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

* Neal Gompa: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 8:59 AM Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:11 PM Florian Weimer wrote: >> > >> > * Dennis Gilmore: >> > >> > > We intentionally never looked at enabling that and always had no plans >> > > to support multi-lib on Arm >> > >> > It's not

Re: Blender failure to build on all repos

On 8/19/21 7:39 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, I attempt to built Blender with the latest upstream update but hit an issue on the following line: /usr/bin/ranlib ../../../lib/libbf_nodes.a gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-2.93.3/redhat-linux-build' [ 55%]

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

On 8/19/21 2:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 07:38:14AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: Well, that build unfortunately failed due to gcc getting killed (the usual arm OOM symptom). Looks like another try has been started. If that fails I think I'll need to bump down ncpus yet

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 8:59 AM Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:11 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > * Dennis Gilmore: > > > > > We intentionally never looked at enabling that and always had no plans > > > to support multi-lib on Arm > > > > It's not multilib. Buildroots

Blender failure to build on all repos

Hello team, I attempt to built Blender with the latest upstream update but hit an issue on the following line: /usr/bin/ranlib ../../../lib/libbf_nodes.a gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-2.93.3/redhat-linux-build' [ 55%] Built target bf_nodes gmake[1]: Leaving

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 07:38 -0600 schrieb Orion Poplawski: > On 8/18/21 2:23 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: > > On 8/17/21 10:21 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > On 8/14/21 10:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:34:11PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > > Have there

Re: Askbot certificate expired

On Thu, 2021-08-19 at 16:28 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:09:06PM +0200, Iago Rubio wrote: > > What's the right place to file a bug for this ? > > Fedora Infrastructure would be the right place. In fact... > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10140 Thank

Re: Askbot certificate expired

On Thu, 2021-08-19 at 21:30 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Please see > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/askbot-fedoraproject-org-archives-are-going-away/16118 Thanks !! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: New maintainer experience

On Thu, 2021-08-19 at 13:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:53:49PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > Yeah, so webmas...@fedoraproject.org goes to the websites mailing > list. > However, I don't see your post there. Did you get a bounce or > rejection email? Nope, and from

Re: New maintainer experience

On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 08:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 08:15:36PM +0700, Didik Supriadi wrote: > > I think ppl now can go to > > https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/user/orphan to see > > orphaned > > packages. > > IMHO, we should not point people to this list.y

Re: Askbot certificate expired

Please see https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/askbot-fedoraproject-org-archives-are-going-away/16118 -- Thanks, Ankur (Sent from mobile device) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Askbot certificate expired

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:09:06PM +0200, Iago Rubio wrote: > What's the right place to file a bug for this ? Fedora Infrastructure would be the right place. In fact... https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10140 -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 07:38:14AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > Well, that build unfortunately failed due to gcc getting killed (the usual > arm OOM symptom). Looks like another try has been started. If that fails I > think I'll need to bump down ncpus yet more (already dropped from 5 to

Re: New maintainer experience

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:53:49PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > Iago Rubio kirjoitti 18.8.2021 klo 14.32: > > Hi all, > > > > Following my messages on the "The Death of Java Packages" thread on > > this list(1), Ankur Shina suggested to me to give a go at being a > > package maintainer and let

Askbot certificate expired

I have been pointed by some web searched to askbot h ttps://askbot.fedoraproject.org and the certificate expired on 27 July. Common Name (CN)askbot.fedoraproject.org Common Name (CN)R3 Organization (O)Let's Encrypt Issued On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 1:11:05 AM

Re: Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 08:35:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:53:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:37:01PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > It's also that redhat-rpm-config has come far from its humble > > > origins:

Re: Orphaning mkdocs-markdownextradata-plugin

OK ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:

Orphaning mkdocs-markdownextradata-plugin

Since the entire stack of packages related to mkdocs was orphaned recently, and I do not wish to take them all myself, I have disabled mkdocs-generated HTML documentation in my packages, and I have orphaned mkdocs-markdownextradata-plugin, which is useless without mkdocs. This package is

Fedora-35-20210819.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 28/141 (aarch64), 23/205 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210814.n.0): ID: 951418 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/951418 ID: 951419 Test: aarch64

Re: openshadinglanguage: Links with Imath but missing in package requires

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:24 AM Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:13 AM Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > > Failure occurred at that line: > > > > In file included from > /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-Release-1.12.1.0-dev/src/liboslexec/oslexec_pvt.h:50, > >

yate

yet another text editor? I thought we already had 6 millions of them. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[389-devel] ATTENTION - going to do a mass unsubscribe of this mailing list

Hello everyone, A few months ago there was a SPAM attack on our list and 1800 people were incorrectly subscribed to this list.  I think there were only 300 people on it prior to this happening.  While actions have been taken to prevent this from happening again, it doesn't help our current

Review swap: pluma-plugins - Modules for the pluma text editor

Hello all, I am looking for a review swap, here is a link to my bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991208 Thank you Wolfgang ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Overriding default %cmake CXXFLAGS

W dniu 16.08.2021 o 22:22, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel pisze: On 16/08/2021 21:14, Julian Sikorski wrote: mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation will fail due to relocation overflows and generally excessive memory and disk space usage. %global optflags %(echo

Re: Specfile description and summary translations

Otto Urpelainen wrote: > I am also afraid that for rpms, current tooling makes success > impossible: nothing tracks when the main Summary is changed and flags > translations as outdated, and any volunteer translator would have to > endure a dist-git pull request workflow to contribute fixes.

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 17:40 +0200 schrieb Dan Horák: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:25:56 +0200 > Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 15:03 +0200 schrieb Ondrej > > Mosnacek: > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:43 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: openshadinglanguage: Links with Imath but missing in package requires

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:13 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Failure occurred at that line: > > In file included from > /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-Release-1.12.1.0-dev/src/liboslexec/oslexec_pvt.h:50, > from >

Re: openshadinglanguage: Links with Imath but missing in package requires

On 2021-08-19 5:27 a.m., Richard Shaw wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:01 AM Luya Tshimbalanga mailto:l...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: Snapshot build from my COPR https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/luya/blender-egl/build/2529655/

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:25:56 +0200 Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 15:03 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:43 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > > wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 14:14 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > > > On

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 15:03 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:43 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 14:14 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 1:41 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > > > wrote: > > > > Am

Re: Fwd: A new version of "OCamlbuild" has been detected: "4.02.3" newer than "0.10.0", packaged as "ocaml-ocamlbuild"

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 8:48 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Where are you seeing 4.02.3? I can't see that in the upstream > repository. Go to https://github.com/ocaml/ocamlbuild/releases. Scroll all the way to the bottom and hit the "Next" button. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

Re: Fwd: A new version of "OCamlbuild" has been detected: "4.02.3" newer than "0.10.0", packaged as "ocaml-ocamlbuild"

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:24:25AM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 18.8.2021 klo 18.52: > >On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 09:20:46AM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote: > >>It looks like the project changed version schemes at some point. The 4.02.3 > >>release was in 2015, before 0.9.0; a

Re: Building docs of compiled extensions with new macros

I have also resorted to manually installing the wheel to a temporary directory in %build, then setting PYTHONPATH to include the temporary directory to build the documentation. I don’t like this solution very well either, but it is a third alternative that seems to work well. See

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

On 8/19/21 9:38 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 8/18/21 2:23 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: On 8/17/21 10:21 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Looks like the vtk build just as it was about to finish (after 11+ hours - had completed extracting debuginfo and was on to checking the build root last I saw)

Re: Building docs of compiled extensions with new macros

On 19. 08. 21 10:25, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: It seems that pip may be changing to in-tree builds? https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/7555 Are we moving towards that as well? It seems like that would make it simpler to build the docs for cases like this. Eventually yes. -- Miro Hrončok

Re: Is something breaking SCM?

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 8:31 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Are you sure the default remote is the Fedora one? If you have your > remote default set to your personal fork, you will need to make sure > you fetch the correct remote (`git remote update` will update all > remotes) > This time, yes,

Re: New maintainer experience

> Am 18.08.2021 um 13:32 schrieb Iago Rubio : > > Hi all, > > Following my messages on the "The Death of Java Packages" thread on > this list(1), Ankur Shina suggested to me to give a go at being a > package maintainer and let the mailing list know how it goes. > > If you find this thread

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

On 8/18/21 2:23 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: On 8/17/21 10:21 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 8/14/21 10:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:34:11PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: Have there been any recent changes to the arm (32bit) builders?  It seems like I'm having much more

Re: Is something breaking SCM?

Are you sure the default remote is the Fedora one? If you have your remote default set to your personal fork, you will need to make sure you fetch the correct remote (`git remote update` will update all remotes) On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:22 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > I noticed that after the

Is something breaking SCM?

I noticed that after the python 3.10 and boost rebuild attempts on FreeCAD that these commits were not showing up in my checkout. I tried "git pull" multiple times and consistently got "Already up to date" or whatever, so I say screw it, bump the release and try to commit and push and THEN it

Re: Plasmashell: Alt+F2 not working

On 8/18/21 12:37 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: El mié, 18 ago 2021 a las 12:24, Iñaki Ucar (>) escribió: On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 14:32, Sergio Belkin mailto:seb...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Since a few days ago, the keyboard shortcut

Re: Bodhi login error

On 8/17/21 2:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:59:38AM -0400, John Florian wrote: I'm trying to report success on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ec4a4b2634 but cannot login.  When I attempt to do so, the page shows: 500 Internal Server Error Could not

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:49 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:43 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:34 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > > wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej > > >

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:43 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 14:14 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 1:41 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > > wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:49 +0200 schrieb Björn > > > 'besser82' > > >

Re: Enable LTO build for crash utility

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:30 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 8/17/2021 8:45 PM, lijiang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In Fedora crash.spec, currently the LTO is disabled as below: > > > > +# This package has an internal copy of GDB which has broken configure > > code for > > +# INTDIV0_RAISES_SIGFPE and

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:11 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Dennis Gilmore: > > > We intentionally never looked at enabling that and always had no plans > > to support multi-lib on Arm > > It's not multilib. Buildroots aren't multilib. > > I'm pretty sure no one but Fedora is building 32-bit Arm

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 14:14 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 1:41 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:49 +0200 schrieb Björn > > 'besser82' > > Esser: > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:43 +0200 schrieb Ondrej > > >

Re: openshadinglanguage: Links with Imath but missing in package requires

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:01 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Snapshot build from my COPR > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/luya/blender-egl/build/2529655/ I see that the non-x86_64 packages are failing. Haven't had time to dig in to why. One thing I did differently on all the packages

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 1:41 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:49 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' > Esser: > > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:43 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:34 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > > > wrote: > >

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:49 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:43 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:34 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > > wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej > > >

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:43 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:34 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would like to update quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide (i.e.

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:34 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to update quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide (i.e. future > > F36) [1][2], but since this update will change sonames (libquazip.so > >

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > Hello, > > I would like to update quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide (i.e. future > F36) [1][2], but since this update will change sonames (libquazip.so > -> libquazip1-qt4.so and libquazip5.so -> libquazip1-qt5.so), I will >

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210819.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210818.0): ID: 951085 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Fedora 35 Mass Branching

V Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 04:33:03PM -0400, Mohan Boddu napsal(a): > 1. The modules will be built for a new platform:f36 The empty commits into the modules I observe are pointless: Either a module uses a stream expansion (platform:[]) and then just resubmitting the last build is enough for MBS to

Re: Building docs of compiled extensions with new macros

On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 19:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 08. 21 11:09, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > I've been experimenting with the new macros for Python packages, and > > ran into some issues building Sphinx docs for compiled extensions. > > > > When building docs, one usually has to

[Bug 1465991] Python3 support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465991 Mattias Ellert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC|

[Bug 1977590] perl-Inline-Python-0.56-16.fc35 FTBFS: all tests fail: Parse errors: Bad plan

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977590 Mattias Ellert changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|j.k.nil...@usit.uio.no |mattias.ell...@physics.uu.s

[Bug 1898112] perl-Inline-Python fails to build with Python 3.10: tests fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898112 Mattias Ellert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC|

[389-devel] Please review 4877 entryuuid fixup

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4878 -- Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, Identity and Access Management SUSE Labs, Australia ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210819.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210818.0): ID: 951001 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: