On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 06:27:54PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Users will be able to use the newer version (2.5) of OpenLDAP, and
> > building packages with openldap-2.4 won't be available, as it won't be
> > present on the specific fedora version. This can affect 3rd partly
> > packages, which
On 10/27/21 05:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 26. 10. 21 13:53, Adrian Reber wrote:
All packages have been rebuild and the side tag has been merged. I was
not able to rebuild the following packages:
* bear
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017733
* community-mysql
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012019
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Encode-3.15-482.fc36 |perl-Encode-3.15-482.fc36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Config-Generator-1.1-1 |perl-Config-Generator-1.1-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829902
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Algorithm-Dependency-1 |perl-Algorithm-Dependency-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-No-Worries-1.7-1.el8 |perl-No-Worries-1.7-1.el8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2015011
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-CHI-0.61-1.fc35
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-STOMP-Client-2.5-1 |perl-Net-STOMP-Client-2.5-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013631
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Messaging-Message-1.7- |perl-Messaging-Message-1.7-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Directory-Queue-2.1-1. |perl-Directory-Queue-2.1-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Config-Validator-1.4-1 |perl-Config-Validator-1.4-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014315
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Authen-Credential-1.2- |perl-Authen-Credential-1.2-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011383
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora-0 |perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917521
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Calendar-Simple-2.0.1- |perl-Calendar-Simple-2.0.1-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980682
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Data-GUID-0.050-1.fc34 |perl-Data-GUID-0.050-1.fc34
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012875
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Graphics-TIFF-17-1.fc3 |perl-Graphics-TIFF-17-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009211
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.57-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012147
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009939
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Encode-3.13-481.fc36 |perl-Encode-3.13-481.fc36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008958
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|rt-4.4.5-4.fc33 |rt-4.4.5-4.fc33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008137
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009986
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.49 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.49
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.48 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.48
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482813
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2 |perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008705
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
* Ben Cotton [19/10/2021 12:08] :
>
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
> Brings a stable and up-to-date version of OpenLDAP according to
> upsteam release. OpenLDAP 2.4 will be out of support as soon as
> OpenLDAP 2.6 is released which is planned for this year. Fedora will
> be prepared for such a step.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:09 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> == User Experience ==
> Users will be able to use the newer version (2.5) of OpenLDAP, and
> building packages with openldap-2.4 won't be available, as it won't be
> present on the specific fedora version. This can affect 3rd partly
>
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:53:25PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fr, 29.10.21 13:57, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Has there been any consideration for potential security risks with
> > regards to the data in this string? Of concern to me are encoding
> > formats,
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:39:38PM -, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> It depends on how wide of a net you cast. Since package naming is
> user-controlled and distribution-wide rules are enforced by disparate
> build systems and environments, an NVR (or NEVRA) is not unique. It's
> close to
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 4:00 PM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Fr, 29.10.21 14:09, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > > the information may be useful: maybe the software is in an older
> > > version that you don't support, or maybe the bug was already fixed in
> > > a later
On Fr, 29.10.21 14:09, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > the information may be useful: maybe the software is in an older
> > version that you don't support, or maybe the bug was already fixed in
> > a later version, etc.
> >
> > That said, for Fedora official builds, package NVR
On Fr, 29.10.21 13:57, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Has there been any consideration for potential security risks with
> regards to the data in this string? Of concern to me are encoding
> formats, size limits or reporting, and structure formats. The
> proposal notes JSON,
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/204 (x86_64), 3/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211028.n.1):
ID: 1046247 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1046247
ID: 1046323 Test: aarch64
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 11/141 (aarch64), 4/206 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211028.n.1):
ID: 1045933 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:39:38PM -, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 07:26:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
2) The proposal is built around using the package NVR to indicate
where it came from. But those names aren't unique. In some cases
it'll work, but in
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:37:27PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:10:15PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 07:26:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 03:09:00PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:30:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Do, 28.10.21 12:10, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
Thanks for revising the change proposal and filling in more details.
After reading through it, I have some questions:
1) The proposal notes that users tend
Congratulations to the Fedora developers and to the team assigned to
deliver a fantastic product.
A special hats off to Mr Q/A, a fellow Canadian for really, under time
stress, insuring a clean quality distro.
For those not in the know, he also does Q/A for the spins.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:42 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:32:16PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/10/29 21:15:
> > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:55:08AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Richard W.M.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018487
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perltidy-20211029-1.fc34.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78020147
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018487
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1838317
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1838317=edit
[patch] Update to 20211029 (#2018487)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018487
Bug ID: 2018487
Summary: perltidy-20211029 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perltidy
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
OLD: Fedora-35-20211028.n.1
NEW: Fedora-35-20211029.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:00 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Company internal only is a rarity these days with cloud deployments
> and people putting Alexa's and similar devices on the company
> internet. That 'smart fridge' in the company workroom or 'smart tv' in
> the executive lounge is
On 29. 10. 21 14:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
From now on, it will be generated as:
python3.10dist(pyyaml) < 6~
Which will not be satisfied by any alpha/beta/rc release of PyYAML 6.
An only as I was typing this, I have realized that it won't work for dev
releases, because 6~~dev1 < 6~ :(
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:32:16PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/10/29 21:15:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:55:08AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at
Hello Pythonistas,
just a heads up that in rawhide, the automatically generated requirements on
Python packages, e.g. python3.Xdist(DISTNAME), ar enow generated in more strict
form.
If a package required "PyYAML < 6", it was previously generated as:
python3.10dist(pyyaml) < 6
Which was
Hi Everyone,
We are working on moving OpenJDK 17 as the system runtime for Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17
Since, like last time we did something similar, the change may have a
somewhat large impact, especially on other packages, we would like to
collect some feedback
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/10/29 21:15:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:55:08AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:16:42AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
Perfect. Thank you Mamoru-san.
armv7hl is now back in.
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211028.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211029.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 22
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 72.84 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:55:08AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:16:42AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > >
> > > Perfect. Thank you Mamoru-san.
> > >
> > > armv7hl is now back in.
> >
> > glusterfs
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 01:53, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:41 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:28 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > > Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> > >
> > > > Mainly because it is the authentication service equivalent of
> > > > telnet**.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:16:42AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> >
> > Perfect. Thank you Mamoru-san.
> >
> > armv7hl is now back in.
>
> glusterfs library is totally broken on armv7, aarch64, s390x at the moment:
>
Are you saying it
Hello,
the new versions of pyproject-rpm-macros (0-49) and python-rpm-macros
(3.10-12) landed in Rawhide. Updates are available for older Fedoras:
F35: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fd8d8c5f66
F34: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-22b68be2d5
F33:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:16:42AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> Perfect. Thank you Mamoru-san.
>
> armv7hl is now back in.
glusterfs library is totally broken on armv7, aarch64, s390x at the moment:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018439
Rich.
--
Richard Jones,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:01 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-10-28 17:02, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 16:42 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> >> Hello team,
> >>
> >>I would like to let you know ImageMagick-6.9.12-26 recently landed
> >> upstream.
> > Hello , when
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 23:33 -0700, l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-10-27 10:21 a.m., "Antonio T. sagitter"
> wrote:
> > Use a side-tag
> > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages
> > ),
> > please.
>
> Done.
> '''
> Side
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211028.0):
ID: 1045437 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 2021-10-28 17:02, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 16:42 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I would like to let you know ImageMagick-6.9.12-26 recently landed
upstream.
Hello , when you update from 6.9.11 to 6.9.12, we need rebuild all
depended packages because we got
On 2021-10-28 00:10, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 27/10/2021 à 01:42, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit :
Hello team,
I would like to let you know ImageMagick-6.9.12-26 recently landed
upstream.
Learning from the previous experiences, I or my co-maintainer are
planning to commit and build this package
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211028.0):
ID: 1045414 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_service_manipulation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1045414
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8
63 matches
Mail list logo
