[Bug 2020636] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.080 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020636 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Fedora-Cloud-33-20211108.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211107.0): ID: 1055780 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[EPEL-devel] Plan for EPEL-9

As both RHEL-9 Beta and CentOS 9 Stream are available, what are the plan for EPEL-9 ? I really this should be available ASAP to be available to our users at GA time. Regards, Remi ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Rawhide kernel crash

Thanks for your investigations. I will do like you , build a custom kernel. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 2020884] perl-PDL-2.059 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020884 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-PDL-2.058 is available |perl-PDL-2.059 is

Re: Fedora-Rawhide-20211104.n.0 compose check report

On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 15:24 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! > 24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing > openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** > below > > Failed

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Saturday, November 6, 2021 11:15:00 PM CST Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world > where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a > lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with high data >

Re: Rawhide kernel crash

On Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:58:56 - "Leigh Scott" wrote: > I think I've found the cause after switching to lightdm. > [snip] > > I've found nothing provides /usr/lib64/dri/simpledrm_dri.so I don't have that file (on rawhide) and my system boots fine with my custom compiled

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On 11/7/21 01:14, Rajeesh K V wrote: Deltarpm did reduce a lot of update download size for many years since 2007 I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically.  I've read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I wonder what changed between the

F35 mock w/ nosync broken?

I just upgraded to F35 and I'm trying to build a package via mock and I'm getting the following error: /usr/bin/python3: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found (required by /var/tmp/tmp.mock.lxb87ex8/lib64/nosync.so) Does it just need a rebuild or something? Thanks, Richard

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 00:16, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > > It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world > where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a > lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with high data expenses. > So

Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide

On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 09:38:00PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25: > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf > > > 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to

[Bug 2020192] perl-DateTime-Tiny-1.07-12.fc36 FTBFS: Failed test '->locale ok' at t/02_main.t line 82.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020192 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |jples...@redhat.com

Fedora-Rawhide-20211107.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 111/206 (x86_64), 65/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211107.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211106.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211107.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 133 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:165.84

Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide

Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25: On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to that version was made. All builds have finished and the side tag was

Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

IQmol isn't compatible with openbabel3. Latest 2.15.0 release (compiled in Fedora) is missing in upstream's repository (but available for Windows/Mac, Linux abandoned?) On 11/6/21 14:01, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: side-tag: f36-build-side-47471 On 11/5/21 21:33, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:

[Bug 2020194] perl-Date-Tiny-1.07-16.fc36 FTBFS: Failed test '->locale ok' at t/02_main.t line 65.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020194 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Rawhide kernel crash

I think I've found the cause after switching to lightdm. X.Org X Server 1.20.11 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: 5.12.13-300.fc34.x86_64 Current Operating System: Linux localhost.localdomain 5.15.0-60.fc36.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Nov 1 15:11:25 UTC 2021 x86_64 Kernel command

[Bug 2020898] perl-Moose-2.2201 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020898 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide

Am Sonntag, dem 07.11.2021 um 16:48 +0900 schrieb Mamoru TASAKA: > Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25: > > All builds have finished and the side tag was merged. > > > > Although everything was built successful in COPR for the real rebuild > > two rebuilds failed: > > > >   * qgis > > This is

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211107.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211106.0): ID: 1055076 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211107.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211106.0): ID: 1055092 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

> > It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the > > world where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta > > rpms makes a lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with > > high data expenses. So i feel turning it on by default and having a > >

Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide

Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25: All builds have finished and the side tag was merged. Although everything was built successful in COPR for the real rebuild two rebuilds failed: * qgis This is recently upgraded grass 7.8.6 packaging mistake which causes qgis to fail to detect grass,

Fedora-Cloud-33-20211107.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211106.0): ID: 1055060 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Rawhide kernel crash

You are right. Thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: