Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On 10/11/2021 08:01, Andreas Schneider wrote: Can you point me to those tons of bundled JS blobs in the source tarball from the above link please? I don't see them. https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/blob/main/yarn.lock - 11K lines of external dependencies. All of them must be compiled

Fedora-Cloud-33-20211110.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211109.0): ID: 1059220 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Monday, November 8, 2021 6:04:12 PM CET Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > I have electron building offline for Fedora, you can find it here: > > > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron > > > I see from the presence of

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Tuesday, November 9, 2021 10:28:12 AM CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 08/11/2021 16:47, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > I have electron building offline for Fedora, you can find it here: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron > > > Electron core

Re: Bugzilla Email Notifications

On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 03:56 +, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) via devel wrote: > Does anyone know if it's possible to set bugzilla.redhat.com to email me a > copy of new bugs or comments that I create? Try: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Then in the "The change was made by me"

Bugzilla Email Notifications

Hi, Does anyone know if it's possible to set bugzilla.redhat.com to email me a copy of new bugs or comments that I create? Thanks, Maxwell -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His PGP Key Fingerprint: f57c76e5a238fe0a628e2ecef79e4e25e8c661f8 gotmax@e.email signature.asc Description: PGP

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 53 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f005e1b879 debmirror-2.35-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing openssl11-1.1.1k-1.el7 rpki-client-7.5-1.el7

[rpms/perl-Verilog-CodeGen] PR #1: Drop support for XEmacs in F36 and later

jjames opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Verilog-CodeGen` that you are following: `` Drop support for XEmacs in F36 and later `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Verilog-CodeGen/pull-request/1

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: generating openssl3 packages from openssl spec

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:38 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Hi all, > > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007031 -- openssl 3.x > won't be added to RHEL 8, while updated packages are starting to need > it. > > It thus seems to be a good candidate for EPEL; the question is -

Re: During the first update after installation: Failed to connect to bus: Invalid argument

Hi everyone, On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 17:55 -0600, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 18:30 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > The bug was opened for a different problem. Once it was fixed, this > > spam  > > started showing up. This bug was reopened. > > > > Who knows what spam

Re: During the first update after installation: Failed to connect to bus: Invalid argument

On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 18:30 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > The bug was opened for a different problem. Once it was fixed, this > spam  > started showing up. This bug was reopened. > > Who knows what spam will show up after this bug gets fixed… > Hi Sam, The bug was just not fixed properly in

Re: During the first update after installation: Failed to connect to bus: Invalid argument

Peter Boy writes: While updating right after installation of Fedora Server 35 today I get: > Running Scriptlet: tzdata-2021b-1.fc35.noarch 306/306 > Failed to connect to bus: Invalid argument > > Failed to connect to bus: Invalid argument > > Failed to connect

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

Nov 9, 2021 9:06:58 AM Robbie Harwood : > Vitaly Zaitsev via devel writes: > >> On 08/11/2021 16:47, Andreas Schneider wrote: >>> I have electron building offline for Fedora, you can find it here: >>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron >> >> Electron

Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:41:16AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > Isn't this an ideal use case for copr? > > I don't know. I could piece together the Koji API fairly easily, and > had hoped to reuse some of the script logic. > > Or does COPR have direct support this? Can

[EPEL-devel] Re: Plan for EPEL-9

On 09. 11. 21 16:07, Troy Dawson wrote: If you can get them branched for epel9-next, you can work on them. Currently a fedpkg that understands epel9-next needs to be built.  I used this pull request [1] and it worked, at least it requested the branch. The people on the rel-eng team that do the

Re: Introduction: nedia, a Silverblue fan

Kia ora to you, and welcome to Fedora! I hope you find something interesting to contribute in. p On 10/27/21 23:30, Aiden Langley wrote: Kia ora koutou, I'm nedia, I live in NZ & I've been knocking about the matrix/irc for a few days now. I'll be 28 on the 30th, I've been using Fedora for

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

I cannot get Gedit to do this when I use it as a text editor, even for extended periods with intermittent thrashing, like loads of edits without a save, etc... It does sound almost hardware specific, maybe failing keyboard.? Stephen On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 12:49 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 18:59 +0100, Michael J. Baars wrote: > Hi Adam, > > I didn't install any update, apparently the update is already included with > the release version of Fedora 35, because it won't install from the command > line and the versions from the build match the versions from the

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #10: 6.34 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.34 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/10 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #10: 6.34 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following: `` 6.34 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/10 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #9: 6.34 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.34 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/9 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Notice: openQA test failures today - expected

Hey folks! Just a heads up about test failures in openQA overnight and today. The server_cockpit_updates test was failing overnight; this was because I switched from virtio to qxl graphics to work around a bug in Rawhide. Unfortunately there seems to be a bug in qxl with a specific thing that test

Notice: openQA test failures today - expected

Hey folks! Just a heads up about test failures in openQA overnight and today. The server_cockpit_updates test was failing overnight; this was because I switched from virtio to qxl graphics to work around a bug in Rawhide. Unfortunately there seems to be a bug in qxl with a specific thing that test

Re: : [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/mnt/koji/work'

On 09. 11. 21 20:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78586013 I kicked off a new build just now to see if it's repeatable: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78587217 See https://status.fedoraproject.org/ -- there is a Koji

: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/mnt/koji/work'

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78586013 I kicked off a new build just now to see if it's repeatable: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78587217 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #9: 6.34 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following: `` 6.34 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/9 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: During the first update after installation: Failed to connect to bus: Invalid argument

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 5:53 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 14:06 +0100, Peter Boy wrote: > > While updating right after installation of Fedora Server 35 today I get: > > > > > [...]# sudo dnf update > > > ... > > > Cleanup : glibc-langpack-de-2.34-7.fc35.x86_64

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #8: 6.34 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.34 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/8 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: During the first update after installation: Failed to connect to bus: Invalid argument

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 02:06:54PM +0100, Peter Boy wrote: > While updating right after installation of Fedora Server 35 today I get: > > > [...]# sudo dnf update > > ... > > Cleanup : glibc-langpack-de-2.34-7.fc35.x86_64 > > 303/306 > > Cleanup :

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

Hi Adam, I didn't install any update, apparently the update is already included with the release version of Fedora 35, because it won't install from the command line and the versions from the build match the versions from the release. This is a fresh installation of Fedora 35 Workstation, done

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #8: 6.34 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following: `` 6.34 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/8 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 2021296] perl-HTTP-Message-6.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021296 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Re: During the first update after installation: Failed to connect to bus: Invalid argument

On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 14:06 +0100, Peter Boy wrote: > While updating right after installation of Fedora Server 35 today I get: > > > [...]# sudo dnf update > > ... > > Cleanup : glibc-langpack-de-2.34-7.fc35.x86_64 > > 303/306 > > Cleanup :

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 16:56 +0100, Michael J. Baars wrote: > On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 15:31 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 09/11/2021 14:18, Michael J. Baars wrote: > > > Nothing with 'sudo dnf upgrade --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6' either. > > > It keeps saying: "Nothing to

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 18:03 +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > Michael J. Baars kirjoitti 9.11.2021 klo 17.56: > > On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 15:31 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > On 09/11/2021 14:18, Michael J. Baars wrote: > > > > Nothing with 'sudo dnf upgrade

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

Hi, This update can't be installed because the update is already in the Fedora 35 release version, according to https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6. I still have the dancing mouse pointer and cursor though :( I'll place a notice of this on

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

Michael J. Baars kirjoitti 9.11.2021 klo 17.56: On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 15:31 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 09/11/2021 14:18, Michael J. Baars wrote: Nothing with 'sudo dnf upgrade --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6' either. It keeps saying: "Nothing to do"??? sudo dnf upgrade

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-11-10 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 15:31 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 09/11/2021 14:18, Michael J. Baars wrote: > > Nothing with 'sudo dnf upgrade --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6' either. > > It keeps saying: "Nothing to do"??? > > sudo dnf upgrade --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL on RHEL 8.2 broken?

On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 10:47, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I requested a CentOS 8 Stream server from IT at $DAYJOB, but it's not IT > approved, so they gave me a RHEL 8.2 instance. Well fine, I don't need their > support but whatever... > > I went to enable EPEL per the docs[1]: > > $ sudo dnf

Orphaning python-bsddb3

Hello all, I'm the current maintainer for the python-bsddb3. Recently, it FTBFS in Rawhide [1], and the upstream now considers it deprecated [2], replaced with the `berkeleydb` python package. [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019310 [2]:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Plan for EPEL-9

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 6:31 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 08. 11. 21 15:56, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:31 AM Neal Gompa > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 2:18 AM Remi Collet > > wrote: > > >

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel writes: > On 08/11/2021 16:47, Andreas Schneider wrote: >> I have electron building offline for Fedora, you can find it here: >> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron > > Electron core packaging is a quite trivial task (Arch Linux and

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

kevin wrote: > I think it's because you only see deltas from N to N+1 now and before > you saw deltas from N to N+X before. So, I think if we made it somehow > create older deltas, you would again see better savings. The issue > doesn't just cause there to be fewer deltas, but it also causes

[EPEL-devel] Re: Plan for EPEL-9

On 08. 11. 21 15:56, Troy Dawson wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:31 AM Neal Gompa > wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 2:18 AM Remi Collet mailto:fed...@famillecollet.com>> wrote: > > As both RHEL-9 Beta and CentOS 9 Stream are available, > what are

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

On 09/11/2021 14:18, Michael J. Baars wrote: Nothing with 'sudo dnf upgrade --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6' either. It keeps saying: "Nothing to do"??? sudo dnf upgrade --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4ce970eca6 --enablerepo=updates-testing -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Source-git SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Source-git SIG on 2021-11-10 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse The meeting will be about: Bi-weekly meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG Agenda:

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Source-git SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Source-git SIG on 2021-11-10 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG Agenda: https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting=Open SIG

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On 11/9/21 7:46 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 04:39, Rajeesh K V wrote: >> I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically. I've read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I wonder what changed between

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 13:00 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Michael J. Baars > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the > > newest Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers. > > > > Since I use gedit a

Fedora-Rawhide-20211109.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 8/192 (x86_64), 73/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211108.n.0): ID: 1058419 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ntfs URL:

During the first update after installation: Failed to connect to bus: Invalid argument

While updating right after installation of Fedora Server 35 today I get: > [...]# sudo dnf update > ... > Cleanup : glibc-langpack-de-2.34-7.fc35.x86_64 > 303/306 > Cleanup : glibc-gconv-extra-2.34-7.fc35.x86_64 > 304/306 >

Re: Firmware packages

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 8:42 AM Aleksei Bavshin wrote: > A module can load a firmware binary with the `request_firmware` API at > any moment of it's lifetime. Usually, this happens when the module is > initialized or discovers a new supported device, but I don't believe > that is a strictly

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 04:39, Rajeesh K V wrote: > > > > I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically. > > > I've > > > read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I wonder > > > what changed between the early implementation when results were very

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 13:00 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Michael J. Baars > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the > > newest Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers. > > > > Since I use gedit a

Re: something weird with python3 on rawhide builds? I'm stumped

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:22 AM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Kaleb Keithley wrote on 2021/11/09 21:14: > > I'm trying to do a scratch build but not getting python3-devel installed. > > > > The .spec file has BR: python3-devel, and rpm -qp --requires on the > > .src.rpm shows it has the needed Requires:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211109.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211108.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211109.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 90 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 123.44 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 13:00 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Michael J. Baars > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the > > newest Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers. > > > > Since I use gedit a

Re: something weird with python3 on rawhide builds? I'm stumped

Kaleb Keithley wrote on 2021/11/09 21:14: I'm trying to do a scratch build but not getting python3-devel installed. The .spec file has BR: python3-devel, and rpm -qp --requires on the .src.rpm shows it has the needed Requires: python3-devel. E.g.

something weird with python3 on rawhide builds? I'm stumped

I'm trying to do a scratch build but not getting python3-devel installed. The .spec file has BR: python3-devel, and rpm -qp --requires on the .src.rpm shows it has the needed Requires: python3-devel. E.g. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6036/78546036/root.log Regular builds of

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Michael J. Baars wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the newest > Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers. > > Since I use gedit a lot for editing source codes, gedit was one of the first > programs I

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

Hi Mikel, Good to know! I would otherwise have downgraded to Fedora 34. Now I don't have to find out for myself the hard way that that wouldn't have been very much of a solution. I will try one of the Gnome mailing lists as well, see if we can find some people that are able to fix this. Best

Re: Fedora 35 - gedit

Hi Mischa, Hau idatzi du Michael J. Baars (mjbaars1977.fedora.de...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2021 aza. 9, ar. (10:14)): > > Hi All, > > I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the newest > Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers. > > Since I use gedit a lot for

[Fedora 36] Call for Test Days

Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends! It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 36. For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results, with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users

[EPEL-devel] Add me to mailing list

mbalaenopte...@gmail.com ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:14:25AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 08/11/2021 22:24, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > And I think that's a*good* thing: JSON might not be perfect — because > > nothing is —, but it's certainly one of the better designed generic > > data formats around, and

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211109.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211108.0): ID: 1057799 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

* Vít Ondruch: > Or maybe I just don't understand how the side-tag is going to be > used. Will there be some modifications necessary for some packages > (except those already listed)? The modifications can go directly into rawhide because they are compatible with older compilers. But at least

Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

* Kevin Fenzi: > Isn't this an ideal use case for copr? I don't know. I could piece together the Koji API fairly easily, and had hoped to reuse some of the script logic. Or does COPR have direct support this? Can I tell it directly to report rawhide in a special buildroot? Is there a

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

> > I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically. I've > > read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I wonder > > what changed between the early implementation when results were very good > > and now, when they really aren't. > > I think it's

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

Dne 09. 11. 21 v 10:14 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a): On 08/11/2021 22:24, Lennart Poettering wrote: And I think that's a*good*  thing: JSON might not be perfect — because nothing is —, but it's certainly one of the better designed generic data formats around, and it's complexity is

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On 08/11/2021 16:47, Andreas Schneider wrote: I have electron building offline for Fedora, you can find it here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron Electron core packaging is a quite trivial task (Arch Linux and Debian have already done this), but what

Re: Self Introduction: Alexander Bulimov

On 08/11/2021 17:19, Alexander Bulimov wrote: The plan is to maintain it with Davide's help, and provide regular updates as the Time Appliance project is in the very active phase now. Hello and welcome to Fedora. Please follow this instructions:

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2008832 Referenced Bugs:

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 08/11/2021 22:24, Lennart Poettering wrote: And I think that's a*good* thing: JSON might not be perfect — because nothing is —, but it's certainly one of the better designed generic data formats around, and it's complexity is absolutely managable. What about YAML? -- Sincerely, Vitaly

Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

Dne 08. 11. 21 v 21:39 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 02:06:43PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: I would like to create a long-running rawhide side tag for preparing Fedora for the removal of implicit function declarations from the GCC defaults. This is a change that happened in

Fedora 35 - gedit

Hi All, I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the newest Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers. Since I use gedit a lot for editing source codes, gedit was one of the first programs I tried to launch. Now, there I get into trouble. After opening a few source

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211109.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211108.0): ID: 1057790 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1057790 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)

Re: Firmware packages

On 11/8/21 22:36, Miroslav Suchý wrote: In the recent discussion about saving space (in the ELF thread) there poped up linux-firmware topic several time. Let's kick it off as separate thread. I have several question and I am unable to find the answer for them. 1. How do I find which

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 cornel panceac changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(cpanc...@gmail.co | |m)