[Bug 2028353] New: Request to update perl-CDB_File to 1.03 (or newer)

2021-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028353 Bug ID: 2028353 Summary: Request to update perl-CDB_File to 1.03 (or newer) Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

2021-12-01 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:15:24PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > shown that the answer is "probably not, actually". And it's _really > hard_ for me to go to Red Hat and say "hey, um, I know you're paying > for this Gitlab contract we can use, but can you please do this huge > project, with

[Bug 2023516] perl-Date-Manip-6.86 is available

2021-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023516 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

Re: (Quite?) OT Question: Is still relevant Software RAID?

2021-12-01 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Sergio Belkin wrote: > Do you think that (Linux) Software RAID is still relevant in this "breve > new world" of cloud/devops ? Yes! It is *the* solution for desktop computers to be safe from data loss due to disk failures. Kevin Kofler ___

[Bug 1584474] Need version update for perl-Razor-Agent

2021-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584474 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Version|34 |rawhide Status|NEW

[Bug 1584474] Need version update for perl-Razor-Agent

2021-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584474 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l | |inuxnetz.de)

Re: (Quite?) OT Question: Is still relevant Software RAID?

2021-12-01 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 12/1/21 13:32, Sergio Belkin wrote: Sorry for the OT. This is probably a question better suited for the users@ list than devel@. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora 35 Cloud image && virt-sysprep

2021-12-01 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Monday, November 29, 2021 4:46:42 PM CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 04:38:26PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Monday, November 29, 2021 4:02:23 PM CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > Hello, > > >

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Colin Walters
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021, at 4:34 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Colin Walters said: >> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/commit/eb74f2ea3e9b453902315539e4f327481162c4f8 > > Missed this message earlier... this seems like this should be the > default on pretty much all Fedora

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:29:43AM -0600, Brandon Nielsen wrote: > On 11/29/21 1:33 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda > > > >= Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI = > > > >== Summary == > > > >The Anaconda

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Colin Walters said: > https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/commit/eb74f2ea3e9b453902315539e4f327481162c4f8 Missed this message earlier... this seems like this should be the default on pretty much all Fedora setups, with documentation on how to change it if you secure

(Quite?) OT Question: Is still relevant Software RAID?

2021-12-01 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi community, Sorry for the OT. I'd like to know your opinion based on current facts :) Do you think that (Linux) Software RAID is still relevant in this "breve new world" of cloud/devops ? Thanks for your opinions :) -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org

Re: Fedora EPEL 7 and enabling devtoolset

2021-12-01 Thread David Sommerseth
On 25/11/2021 15:11, Ben Beasley wrote: I’d like to point to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sleef/blob/epel7/f/sleef.spec as a working example of a package that is built with a devtoolset in EPEL7. While I maintain the sleef package, the EPEL7 backport was contributed by Dave Love. – Ben

Re: F36 Change: Plocate as the default locate implementation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 03:00:34PM -0500, Garry T. Williams wrote: > On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 9:10:33 AM EST Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > Also, the plocate-updatedb service was not started after installing > > it, so I can't use locate until the DB is created. Is that expected? > > Does it

Re: F36 Change: Plocate as the default locate implementation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 08:55:44PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:13:07PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 4:54 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 01:52:43PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > >

Re: F36 Change: Plocate as the default locate implementation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:13:07PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 4:54 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 01:52:43PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:19 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > > == How To Test == > >

[Bug 2028263] New: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000143 is available

2021-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028263 Bug ID: 2028263 Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000143 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test2-Suite Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 15:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 22:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:03 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > I don't use sudo , and I'm against the use of

Re: F36 Change: Plocate as the default locate implementation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Garry T. Williams
On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 9:10:33 AM EST Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Also, the plocate-updatedb service was not started after installing > it, so I can't use locate until the DB is created. Is that expected? > Does it wait until the timer runs it? I believe that is normal. Earlier releases of

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

2021-12-01 Thread Florian Weimer
* Daniel P. Berrangé: > We do much the same in libvirt > > https://github.com/libvirt/libvirt-python/pull/4#issuecomment-662443409 > > FWIW, there's no need to write a bot to achieve this - there's a > a github action: > > https://github.com/apps/repo-lockdown > > you can simply enable for

Re: Go reviewers needed [was Re: packaging sourcegraph cli -- any volunteers?]

2021-12-01 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 05:42:06PM +0100, Alejandro Saez Morollon wrote: > > Any takers? > Will do :) Thank you! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 9:49 AM Chris Adams wrote: > So, not directly related to the proposal, but jumping in here because it > goes with the above statement - the "root should be left locked" setup > is a problem that keeps single-user mode broken. I tried to follow the > Fedora (and other

Re: F36 Change: Plocate as the default locate implementation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 3:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 05:52:26PM -0500, Garry T. Williams wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 4:53:12 PM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 01:52:43PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote: >

Re: F36 Change: Plocate as the default locate implementation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 4:54 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 01:52:43PM -0500, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:19 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > == How To Test == > > > # Install `plocate` (`sudo dnf install plocate --allowerasing`) > > > #

[Bug 2028239] New: perl-Locale-Codes-3.69 is available

2021-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028239 Bug ID: 2028239 Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.69 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Locale-Codes Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2025322] EPEL9 Branch Request: perl-utf8-all

2021-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025322 Igor Raits changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(mspa...@redhat.co

Re: F36 Change: ostree native containers / CoreOS layering (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Brian (bex) Exelbierd
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 5:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:23 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OstreeNativeContainer > > > > == Summary == > > > > Enhance the (rpm-)ostree stack to natively support OCI/Docker > > containers as a transport

Re: java-17-openjdk mass-rebuild for f36 in copr I

2021-12-01 Thread Jiri Vanek
https://github.com/judovana/FedoraSystemJdkBump/blob/main/scritps/spammer/exemplarResults/verboseResults.txt Here you go. J. On 12/1/21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 11/30/21 01:53, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 11/29/21 15:01, Mat Booth wrote: On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 13:16, Jiri Vanek wrote:

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

2021-12-01 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 11:40:43AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:20:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Note the GNOME auto-closer provides a comment telling the user that the > > primary repo is on gitlab and pointing them to where it is. Logging > > > How hard

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

2021-12-01 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Wed, Dec 1 2021 at 11:40:43 AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: How hard would it be to actually automatically mirror the PR? It actually does that, but if you don't follow up on GitLab it's just going to get closed, since PRs from new contributors are never good enough to merge the first

Re: java-17-openjdk mass-rebuild for f36 in copr I

2021-12-01 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hi! The timout is a bit of issue. It is chromium, javas, and now I'm aware aout hdf5. I had not not manually touched the timeout, because it was "jsut" first round. I will keep it in mind, and prolong it in next rerun. Tomorrow, I will send personal eamil to each maintainer. with his

Re: Go reviewers needed [was Re: packaging sourcegraph cli -- any volunteers?]

2021-12-01 Thread Alejandro Saez Morollon
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 5:40 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > https://github.com/sourcegraph/src-cli > > Okay, so, Jan Kuparinen (copperi) is working on this. I'm happy to sponsor > him, but I am not up on the state of Go packaging, like, even a little bit. > Can someone help by reviewing his

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

2021-12-01 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:20:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > Note the GNOME auto-closer provides a comment telling the user that the > primary repo is on gitlab and pointing them to where it is. Logging How hard would it be to actually automatically mirror the PR? -- Matthew Miller

Go reviewers needed [was Re: packaging sourcegraph cli -- any volunteers?]

2021-12-01 Thread Matthew Miller
> https://github.com/sourcegraph/src-cli Okay, so, Jan Kuparinen (copperi) is working on this. I'm happy to sponsor him, but I am not up on the state of Go packaging, like, even a little bit. Can someone help by reviewing his packages? He's tackling the various dependencies, starting with:

Re: F36 Change: ostree native containers / CoreOS layering (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:23 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OstreeNativeContainer > > == Summary == > > Enhance the (rpm-)ostree stack to natively support OCI/Docker > containers as a transport and delivery mechanism for operating system > content. > > This is

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Jiri Konecny
Dne 01. 12. 21 v 16:16 Jonathan Wakely napsal(a): On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 19:36, Ben Cotton wrote: == Release Notes == In the User spoke, the "Make this user administrator" checkbox is now checked by default. This improves installation experience for users who do not know and need to rely on

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Jiri Konecny
Dne 01. 12. 21 v 1:10 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a): On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:08:19AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Tue, Nov 30 2021 at 10:57:37 AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/commit/eb74f2ea3e9b453902315539e4f327481162c4f8 Should we

FedoraRespin-35-updates-20211201.0 compose check report

2021-12-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Soas live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/46 (x86_64) ID: 1075317 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1075317 ID: 1075342 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL:

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread mkolman
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 09:29 -0600, Brandon Nielsen wrote: > On 11/29/21 1:33 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda > > > > = Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI = > > > > == Summary == > > > > The Anaconda

rust: Request for packaging rust-html-escape and rust-smallbitvec

2021-12-01 Thread Andreas Schneider
Hello, I would like to compile the tree-sitter parser generating tool. For this rust- html-escape and rust-smallbitvec is missing in the distro. It would allow that you can add additional languages for highlighting in neovim. If someone who is familiar with rust could packages those two small

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: > Boot with `systemd.debug-shell=1` and there will be a root console > available on tty9 from very early in boot. Not sure if it's early > enough for this specific scenario, but it is for a lot. > > You can also boot to the initramfs environment by booting

Re: F36 Change: Plocate as the default locate implementation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:10:33PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I have just installed plocate to try it on F34, and got: > > warning: /etc/updatedb.conf saved as /etc/updatedb.conf.rpmsave > > I reviewed the changes, and the new file is empty. Users will notice > the difference. Is that

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

2021-12-01 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 04:22:42 PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Well that would be what I was missing. I guess this should be much less controversial, then, if it's OK for people to just continue using dist-git forever and completely ignore src-git? Nobody is ever required to use something

[Bug 2028150] New: perl-Sys-Virt-7.10.0 is available

2021-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028150 Bug ID: 2028150 Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-7.10.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sys-Virt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Brandon Nielsen
On 11/29/21 1:33 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda = Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI = == Summary == The Anaconda installer GUI will have the administrative rights checkbox on the User screen ticked by

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 19:36, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Release Notes == > > In the User spoke, the "Make this user administrator" checkbox is now > checked by default. This improves installation experience for users > who do not know and need to rely on the default values to guide them. What's the

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 14:39 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 30.11.21 15:57, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 22:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:03 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at

Re: F36 Change: Plocate as the default locate implementation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 17:20, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > The upgrade should be mostly invisible. It is possible that somebody > might be relying on some very specific `mlocate` behaviour or parsing > the `mlocate` database directly, but no such cases are currently >

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 30.11.21 15:57, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 22:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:03 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > I don't use sudo , and I'm

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

2021-12-01 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:12:29PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 12. 21 0:37, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 1 2021 at 12:27:35 AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman > > wrote: > > > How do people using this setup prevent people from submitting PR and > > > issues to the Github mirror where

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

2021-12-01 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 01. 12. 21 0:37, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Wed, Dec 1 2021 at 12:27:35 AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: How do people using this setup prevent people from submitting PR and issues to the Github mirror where they cannot be applied/fixed? For GNOME we just set up a bot that autocloses

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

2021-12-01 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 01. 12. 21 13:03, Hunor Csomortáni wrote: Packit developer and Source-git SIG member here, joining two days late to this thread. One important thing to call out: the source-git workflow is not officially adopted by the Fedora Community. All the work that is ongoing in this space is

Fedora-Rawhide-20211201.n.0 compose check report

2021-12-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 6/142 (aarch64), 1/208 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211130.n.0): ID: 1075018 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi

Re: Automatically generated Obsoletes tags?

2021-12-01 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 29. 11. 21 23:32, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 08:04, Tomáš Orsava wrote: The downside is that we will have a few thousand (est. 3624 [1]) additional Obsoletes tags in the Fedora repos that are mostly useless. Does anyone see a problem with this? Given the amount

Is there a problem if we add ~4 thousand automatically generated obsoletes?

2021-12-01 Thread Miro Hrončok
See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/2OCCFIKT7LZ7IPO3OKIEH3TDTGERSORM/ Would adding automatically generated obsoletes to 3624 Python packages have any observable negative impact (e.g. on the repodata size or time to resolve deps)? --

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

2021-12-01 Thread Hunor Csomortáni
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:09 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you > support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on > gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge? > > Fedora Council has already effectively stated

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211201.n.0 changes

2021-12-01 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211130.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211201.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 133 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.42 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211201.0 compose check report

2021-12-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211130.0): ID: 1074830 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211201.0 compose check report

2021-12-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211130.0): ID: 1074814 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 08:49 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Ben Cotton said: > > Further, this change of defaults complements the default for root > > account. The redesign of root setup screen in Fedora 35 makes it clear > > that root should be left locked. > > So, not directly

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-12-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 16:10 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:08:19AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 30 2021 at 10:57:37 AM -0500, Colin Walters > > wrote: > > >