On Friday, 25 February 2022 14:02:11 CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> I think this is probably one of those things that would be worth
> forming a SIG on. An Electron SIG could help with Electron and all
> Electron-based applications that come into Fedora.
That would be fine by me. The most obvious
The EPEL Steering Committee has implementing monthly office hours for
the EPEL project. These will be held on the first Wednesday of each
month at 1700 UTC. The openSUSE Heroes team has agreed to let us host
the meeting on their Jitsi Meet instance. Please join us at
# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-02-28
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 3 proposed Beta blockers, 4 proposed Beta freeze
exception issues, and 5 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's
have a review meeting on Monday.
If you
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2022-02-28
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
It's been a while since we met, so let's get together and see where
we're at for Fedora 36 and so on.
Notification time stamped 2022-02-20 13:54:50 UTC
From a4314a51b9f083bbd4c631ca6162c1ead94d1916 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Feb 20 2022 13:45:55 +
Subject: Update to 1.876
- New upstream release 1.876
- Improved suppressing the PDL CLONE warning; piddles should not
Notification time stamped 2022-02-20 13:46:46 UTC
From a4314a51b9f083bbd4c631ca6162c1ead94d1916 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Feb 20 2022 13:45:55 +
Subject: Update to 1.876
- New upstream release 1.876
- Improved suppressing the PDL CLONE warning; piddles should not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058821
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.913-1.fc34.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83341847
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058821
Bug ID: 2058821
Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.913 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058821
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1863392
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1863392=edit
Update to 1.913 (#2058821)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
Miroslav Suchý writes:
> [...] Springdale provides
> devtoolset-3-elfutils there, and it in some strange way badly
> correlates with the initial Copr build environment (even before
> the rpmbuild process starts). Some python2 module cannot find
> libelf.so.1 ...
I believe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058812
Bug ID: 2058812
Summary: perl-DB_File-1.857 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DB_File
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Fri, 2022-02-25 at 02:43 +0300, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 21:20 +0300, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> > > Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > > > Second, the alternate Springdale Linux repo
> > > > > http://springdale.princeton.edu/data/springdale/SCL/7/x86_64/ s
>
EPEL Playground was shut down in January 2022
EPEL 8 Playground was a place that developers and maintainers could "play
around" with updated, or changed packages in epel. EPEL Playground never
really worked out and ended up being more of a burden than helpful.
If developers or maintainers want
On 25/02/2022 19:08, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Is that intentional that i get some random notifications from Discourse
or what is going on? In past month, I was notified about following topics:
* Join us for the EPEL office hours every month [Fedora] epel
* Self-intro glaringgibbon [Fedora]
Is that intentional that i get some random notifications from Discourse
or what is going on? In past month, I was notified about following topics:
* Join us for the EPEL office hours every month [Fedora] epel
* Self-intro glaringgibbon [Fedora] introductions
* It's #FedoraShareYourScreen
On 2/22/22 19:47, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Denis Fateyev wrote:
>> The "ustl" upstream, for which I maintain the RPM package, has recently
>> switched from providing a shared library to a static library.
>
> Generally, you do not want to follow such a change, but force the build
> system
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220224.0):
ID: 1148427 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1148427
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. anaconda — When running anaconda on Wayland with two keyboard
layouts configured, hitting any modifier key with the second layout
selected switches to the first layout — ASSIGNED
ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue
2.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:41:58AM -0600, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> I’m trying to build my packages for EPEL-9 on my up-to-date F35
> machine using Mock. I checked /etc/mock but can’t find any specific
> epel-9 config so I went with centos-stream+epel-next-9. Okay, fine,
> but when I run
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 5:42 PM Ron Olson wrote:
> I guess there was some CPU requirement change that I didn’t catch;
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2021/01/05/building-red-hat-enterprise-linux-9-for-the-x86-64-v2-microarchitecture-level
discussed the issue(s), and the x86_64 v2
* Ron Olson:
> I’m trying to build my packages for EPEL-9 on my up-to-date F35
> machine using Mock. I checked /etc/mock but can’t find any specific
> epel-9 config so I went with centos-stream+epel-next-9. Okay, fine,
> but when I run the job, it fails immediately with the error “Fatal
> glibc
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-dc3bd1f656
llvm13-13.0.1-1.el7 rust-1.58.1-1.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-18ac3af1c8
varnish-4.0.5-3.el7
0
Hey all-
I’m trying to build my packages for EPEL-9 on my up-to-date F35 machine using
Mock. I checked /etc/mock but can’t find any specific epel-9 config so I went
with centos-stream+epel-next-9. Okay, fine, but when I run the job, it fails
immediately with the error “Fatal glibc error: CPU
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
composer-2.2.7-1.el9
kde-settings-35.0-2.el9.1
translate-shell-0.9.6.12-5.el9
xrootd-5.4.1-1.el9
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055412
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-File-Find-utf8-0.014-1 |perl-File-Find-utf8-0.014-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053914
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Dist-Milla-1.0.21-1.fc |perl-Dist-Milla-1.0.21-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055412
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053914
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
Hi, Adam,
I am afraid of not to upload successfully, if that I will wait only.
Thank you very much.
Jun
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Williamson
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 3:22 PM
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Cc: Miao, Jun
> Subject: Re: How long to
I was able to rebase unpaper to version 6.1^20220117.gite515408 in Fedora 37
thanks to ffmpeg we now have in a distribution. This new version changed
a license from GPL+ to GPLv2.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 12/229 (x86_64), 10/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220224.n.0):
ID: 1147714 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1147714
ID: 1147755 Test: x86_64
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:54 AM Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Over the past 8 month, I've been working on getting Electron [1] built on
> Fedora. Yesterday I was finally able to do the first working build for Fedora
> Rawhide [2]. This was possible because we finally have ffmpeg [3] in
OLD: Fedora-36-20220224.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220225.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 50
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:1.32 MiB
Size
On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 10:14 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022, at 6:17 AM, Benjamin Berg wrote:
>
> > network-online-waitonly.target with
> > After=network-online.target
> > StopWhenUnneeded=yes
> >
> > which is then used inside iscsi.service
> >
V Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 07:37:35PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Petr Pisar wrote on 2022/02/25 19:10:
> > V Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:46:15AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > > On f37 / f36 leptonica made some packaging change:
> > >
> On 25.02.22 11:37, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
> Apologies, my mistake, upstream uses different library names depending
> on whether you build with autotools or cmake, and when switching to
> cmake I accidentally only provided the compat symlink for the
> unversioned link library, but not for the
On 25. 02. 22 9:51, Akira TAGOH wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
nim: sil-namdhinggo-fonts, yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts, gfs-decker-fonts,
gfs-didot-fonts, gfs-bodoni-fonts, impallari-dancing-script-fonts,
gfs-didot-display-fonts, typesetit-great-vibes-fonts,
On 25.02.22 11:37, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Petr Pisar wrote on 2022/02/25 19:10:
V Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:46:15AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
On f37 / f36 leptonica made some packaging change:
Hey,
due to the lack of time I'm orphaning the following set of packages:
augeas-vala
clpeak
gimp-fourier-plugin
gocl
python-uinput
Feel free to step up and take them.
Greetings
- fabian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Petr Pisar wrote on 2022/02/25 19:10:
V Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:46:15AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
On f37 / f36 leptonica made some packaging change:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/leptonica/c/e2486ca5bc2578ee629457b854c5e13bb94c1dde?branch=rawhide
This caused soname change:
V Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:46:15AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> On f37 / f36 leptonica made some packaging change:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/leptonica/c/e2486ca5bc2578ee629457b854c5e13bb94c1dde?branch=rawhide
>
> This caused soname change: liblept.so.5 -> libleptonica.so.5.4.0 ,
Hello!
Over the past 8 month, I've been working on getting Electron [1] built on
Fedora. Yesterday I was finally able to do the first working build for Fedora
Rawhide [2]. This was possible because we finally have ffmpeg [3] in Fedora.
My use for Electron is that I want to run signal-desktop
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220224.0):
ID: 1147622 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220224.0):
ID: 1147606 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> nim: sil-namdhinggo-fonts, yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts, gfs-decker-fonts,
> gfs-didot-fonts, gfs-bodoni-fonts, impallari-dancing-script-fonts,
> gfs-didot-display-fonts, typesetit-great-vibes-fonts,
> sil-charis-compact-fonts,
>
V Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 04:23:11PM +0100, Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:22 PM Mamoru TASAKA
> wrote:
> > On f37 / f36 two days ago libwebsockets was updated from 4.2.2 to 4.3.1
> > which causes unannounced soname bump from libwebsockets.so.18 to
> > libwebsockets.so.19
>
On 2/24/22 16:37, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 1:35:38 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Did you discuss modularising curl itself upstream?
It was
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 3:37:56 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 24, 2022 1:35:38 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > Did you discuss
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 2:58:10 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 24, 2022 1:35:38 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Did you discuss modularising curl itself upstream?
> >
> > It was added to their
49 matches
Mail list logo
