On 4/15/22 5:06 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Initial test with a CD-R and an HP Compaq 8510w are mixed.
It boots to GRUB, but it spins a long time blinking the HDD light displaying
nothing but "Welcome to GRUB". It eventually spits out "failure reading
sector 0x4f838 from 'hd31'."
'hd31'
Chris Adams writes:
> Once upon a time, Jared Dominguez said:
>> Looks like they are using vSphere, which supports UEFI VMs. The same is
>> true for KVM, Xen and bhyve, so it's more about what feature set cloud
>> providers using these hypervisors are choosing to turn on.
>
> In a way, this is
Ben Cotton writes:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateLegacyBIOS
>
> == Summary ==
> Make UEFI a hardware requirement for new Fedora installations on
> platforms that support it (x86_64). Legacy BIOS support is not
> removed, but new non-UEFI installation is not supported on those
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075768
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn ---
This happens because each component can have a different template for the bug
description. It should only do this if the component switched to uses a
different template than the original template
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 4:57 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Yeah, I'll echo smooge here. Can you expand on exactly what you are
> hitting?
>
> I can't seem to find the orig thread from 2016 in my mailbox, so I'm
> really not sure what the issue is here. ;(
>
> kevin
>
>
Going back to the original
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 12:39:56PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 at 09:54, Amos wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:31:01 -0600 Erinn Looney-Triggs
> > > >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provid...
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076389
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-DateTime-1.58-1.fc34.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=85884420
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076389
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1873414
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1873414=edit
Update to 1.58 (#2076389)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076389
Bug ID: 2076389
Summary: perl-DateTime-1.58 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076352
Bug ID: 2076352
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.24 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Tested this iso with an USB stick on this machine here and it passed the
tests and Anaconda started correctly.
Machine: Type: Laptop System: Hewlett-Packard product: HP G42 Notebook PC
Mobo: Hewlett-Packard model: 1484 v: 77.19 BIOS: Hewlett-Packard v: F.17
date: 07/06/2010
CPU Dual core Pentium
Hi,
i wrote:
> > xorrisofs option --mbr-force-bootable
Chris Murphy wrote:
> with the bit set it means older versions of
> Tianocore or anything based on Tianocore up until maybe 6 months ago,
> won't boot.
Is this maybe about the code snippet of Tianocore which Alexander E.
Patrakov showed in
On 17. 04. 22 15:56, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
We have specific issues during an Fedora upgrade.
In past, it was issue with rdma-core [1] during upgrade to F34. Nowadays, for
upgrade to F36, we have an issue with lilv [2]
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919864
[2]
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 03:12:59PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> I've tested your ISO with:
>
> - Dell XPS 15 L502X 8GB RAM (BIOS only) CD-R physical media
>
> Booted and started the installer reasonably fast
>
> - same machine USB media (written to whole device using dd)
>
>
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7aca455c41
pdns-4.6.2-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
efifs-1.8-3.el8
Details about builds:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 5:17 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > > Dell XPS 15 L502X 8GB RAM (BIOS only)
>
> BIOS-only on a laptop might mean the firmware quirk which demands
> to see the "boot/active" flag at some MBR partition table slot.
>
> See a
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-72a7426715
pdns-4.6.2-1.el9
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cfff8c1f5c
composer-2.3.5-1.el9
The following builds have been
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 11:26 AM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> I'm not a Fedora developer, just a long time interested user, so take
> this for what it's worth. I'd like to suggest an alternative approach
> to the BIOS boot (and potentially other similar boot issues), or at
> least suggest that this
I'm not a Fedora developer, just a long time interested user, so take
this for what it's worth. I'd like to suggest an alternative approach
to the BIOS boot (and potentially other similar boot issues), or at
least suggest that this approach be discussed.
Basically, I suggest that Fedora stop
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 10/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220417.n.0):
ID: 1229381 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1229381
ID: 1229453 Test: aarch64
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220417.0):
ID: 1229728 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1229728
Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_jwhois_with_whois_in_Fedora_Workstation
== Summary ==
Fedora Workstation product core group includes `jwhois` package.
Replace it with `whois` package which is more actively developed.
== Detailed Description ==
`Fedora Workstation product core`
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_jwhois_with_whois_in_Fedora_Workstation
== Summary ==
Fedora Workstation product core group includes `jwhois` package.
Replace it with `whois` package which is more actively developed.
== Detailed Description ==
`Fedora Workstation product core`
It would be very nice to run /sbin/dmidecode, which is on the .iso,
and report the "BIOS Information" section, such as:
Is the attached any use?
In the attachment I see these interesting lines (snipped):
=
SMBIOS 3.0.0 present.
BIOS Information
Vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
OLD: Fedora-36-20220417.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220418.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:25:36AM -0500, Steve Cossette wrote:
> There aren't too many of them today, but I guess they
> still exist.
I actually use them quite frequently to access remote control on IPMI/KVM
webpages on "older" servers. Luckily newer servers do provide HTML5 based
remote
People,
On 2022-04-18 12:41, John Reiser wrote:
- Dell XPS 15 L502X 8GB RAM (BIOS only) CD-R physical media
It would be very nice to run /sbin/dmidecode, which is on the .iso,
and report the "BIOS Information" section, such as:
Is the attached any use?
Phil.
=
# dmidecode 3.3
Hi,
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > Dell XPS 15 L502X 8GB RAM (BIOS only)
BIOS-only on a laptop might mean the firmware quirk which demands
to see the "boot/active" flag at some MBR partition table slot.
See a thread of grub-bug (and later grub-devel) from 2015/16
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220417.0):
ID: 1229296 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Monday, 18 April 2022 at 10:13, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > - same machine USB media (written to whole device using dd)
> > Boot fails with "Operation system not found" error.
>
> (Looks like my optimism was somewhat premature.)
>
> I wonder from
Hi,
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> - same machine USB media (written to whole device using dd)
> Boot fails with "Operation system not found" error.
(Looks like my optimism was somewhat premature.)
I wonder from where this message comes. Was it really "Operation system"
and not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076185
Bug ID: 2076185
Summary: perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99034 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-Whois-Raw
Keywords: FutureFeature,
32 matches
Mail list logo
