For context, until very recently, the EPEL guidelines explicitly asked
packagers to disable time-based push on fully-compatible “minor release” type
updates and let them sit indefinitely in testing until/unless they accrued +3
karma. The historical guidelines are mostly preserved on the
On 2022-04-18 18:25, Ian Pilcher wrote:
...
Basically, I suggest that Fedora stop worrying about BIOS boot or other
"weird" boot configurations. Instead, provide a truly manual
installation path where all boot and storage configuration is the
responsibility of the user.
...
I am using
On Tuesday, 19 April 2022 at 17:34, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Looks like it's a common issue with USB stick booting on these old Dell
> > XPS 15s:
> > https://askubuntu.com/questions/611135/operation-system-not-found-during-usb-boot
> >
On 4/21/22 00:48, Troy Dawson wrote:
It was pointed out that we have 160 packages in epel7-testing.
10 of those are legitimate updates that are less than a week old.
Then there are 3 that are less than a year old.
And then there are 147 that are between 2 and 6 years old.
(Yep, there are none
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Right now it's not entirely clear whether this is considered part of
> the Change scope or not. The paragraph about the `uvesafb` driver seems
> kind of aspirational and doesn't seem to commit to anything. The
> "Benefit to Fedora" section states "Verified modern supported
It was pointed out that we have 160 packages in epel7-testing.
10 of those are legitimate updates that are less than a week old.
Then there are 3 that are less than a year old.
And then there are 147 that are between 2 and 6 years old.
(Yep, there are none that are between 1 and 2 years old).
So,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077288
Bug ID: 2077288
Summary: perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.90 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-CheckOS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi,
Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Currently we use isohybrid [1] (also from syslinux package) to modify the
> ISO to be able to be booted on a USB key. Would we be able to still get that
> functionality without isohybrid from the syslinux package?
Yes. The GRUB2 MBR code will get the equivalent treatment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077283
Bug ID: 2077283
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220420 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077281
Bug ID: 2077281
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220420 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords:
On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 15:06 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Apologies for the delay here, but I've updated the change proposal
> page based on the feedback in this thread. Please let me know what you
> think.
To echo what Kamil and Kevin said earlier: I'm fine with this so long
as we still have a
On Tuesday, 19 April 2022 at 09:20, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i wrote:
> > > Does the following bash hack "repair" the USB stick so that it boots on
> > > the affected machine ?
> > > echo $'\x80' | dd of=/dev/sdX conv=notrunc bs=1 seek=446 count=1
>
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:06:33PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> I've updated the change proposal page based on the feedback in this
> thread. Please let me know what you think.
I love it. It's funny to read but very clear.
One suggestion: collect the diagnostics commadn in a pastable string that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076913
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076895
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
neovim-0.7.0-1.el8
perl-Math-Int64-0.54-20.el8
perl-MooX-StrictConstructor-0.011-7.el8
python-pyzabbix-1.0.0-3.el8
root-6.26.02-1.el8
rtl-433-21.12-4.20220401git8228f0d.el8
On 4/13/22 19:52, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> A huge thanks to Thomas Schmitt for posting xorrisofs arguments :)
>
> Here is a lorax PR switching to grub2 for BIOS and changing the layout
> of the iso as described in his post:
Hey Brian, thanks for sharing. Is this an effort to drop the
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a970a526cb
composer-1.10.26-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
GitPython-1.0.2-1.el7
cptutils-1.74-1.el7
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 3:07 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> Apologies for the delay here, but I've updated the change proposal
> page based on the feedback in this thread. Please let me know what you
> think.
>
You noted Parallels Desktop, which is actually a fair point I forgot about.
Fortunately,
Apologies for the delay here, but I've updated the change proposal
page based on the feedback in this thread. Please let me know what you
think.
- ajax
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 4:10 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyXorgDriverRemoval
>
>
> == Summary ==
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077156
Bug ID: 2077156
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.25 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077156
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
GenericError: File upload failed:
cli-build/1650480942.8324552.eLJYdRtW/perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.25-1.fc34.src.rpm
Traceback:
File
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 12/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220419.n.0):
ID: 1231975 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1231975
ID: 1232008 Test:
Good everning,
I just experienced that, when setting up a new Fedora, Anaconda (both
"Custom" and "Advanced Custom (Blivet-GUI)") always uses aes-xts-plain64
for disk encryption, even if the hardware does not support AES-NI.
Does it make sense to use xchacha12,aes-adiantum-plain64 by default
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have an F36 Final
release candidate. As a result, F36 Final is NO-GO for target date #1
and tomorrow's Go/No-Go meeting is cancelled.
The next Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at
1700 UTC on Thursday 28 April in #fedora-meeting.
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have an F36 Final
release candidate. As a result, F36 Final is NO-GO for target date #1
and tomorrow's Go/No-Go meeting is cancelled.
The next Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at
1700 UTC on Thursday 28 April in #fedora-meeting.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077083
Bug ID: 2077083
Summary: Razor Agent fails auth on spam report
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Razor-Agent
Severity: high
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076895
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-MooX-StrictConstructor
OLD: Fedora-36-20220419.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220420.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 11
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076071
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076097
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073667
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076046
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076913
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Math-Int64-0.54-20.el8
--
You
Dne 19. 04. 22 v 20:35 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 07:48:56PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I think this is broken again. Last notification I have received was at
03:50:49 UTC.
Yep. Restarted it.
Thank you. It works as of today.
In other news, we now have the upstream
On 4/13/22 23:28, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I've gotta ask... How much memory does the new dnf daemon take while idle?
I know this comes up time to time... As it is, PackageKitd and gnome-software
both, individually, take ~ 450MB of RAM without any user interaction (other
than logging in to a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076895
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076913
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077027
Bug ID: 2077027
Summary: perl-local-lib-2.29 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-local-lib
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 at 08:49, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 14.03.22 23:50, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > As per [1] I'll be landing mingw-gcc-12.0.1 and mingw-binutils-2.38
> > towards the end of the week. I've completed test-builds here [2].
>
> Looks like there is an ABI incompatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073667
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a2884f05e5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a2884f05e5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073667
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Prima-1.65-1.fc37
The License field of python-pyscaffold has been corrected from MIT to
(MIT and BSD0). The overall license is MIT, but the template files are BSD0.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello,
I've just orphaned python-readthedocs-sphinx-ext[1].
In the communication with the upstream we discovered this extension was
used as an internal tool for the readthedocs builders. We concluded it
shouldn't be needed in Fedora at all.
Three packages in Fedora BR it, all of them received
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073667
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Prima-1.64 is |perl-Prima-1.65 is
https://postimg.cc/bD87J8tF
Tested on old Dell r720 with bios boot.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220419.0):
ID: 1231816 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://postimg.cc/bD87J8tF
Booted on the old Dell r710 via classic bios.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076913
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076895
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076097
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-c15bf394d2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c15bf394d2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 11:18:17PM -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> On 4/11/22 08:50, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >On 4/10/22 8:28 PM, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> >>The first problem is that the location of runtime DLLs varies
> >>wildly between distributions, and there's no common independent
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076097
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-2.34-1.fc37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2076899
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076913
Bug ID: 2076913
Summary: Add perl-Math-Int64 to EPEL8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Math-Int64
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2076909
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076895
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2076893
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2076893
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076898
Bug ID: 2076898
Summary: Add perl-Data-Printer to EPEL8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-Printer
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076895
Bug ID: 2076895
Summary: Add perl-MooX-StrictConstructor to EPEL8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-MooX-StrictConstructor
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894
Bug ID: 2076894
Summary: Add perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-List-AllUtils
Assignee: mspa...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076046
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076097
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-File-Listing` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.15 bump and package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-Listing/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076071
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-382fe17509 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-382fe17509
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076071
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Harness-3.44-1.fc
On 4/17/22 13:26, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
Apr 16, 2022 8:01:27 PM Globe Trotter via devel :
Source1: %{source0}.sig
Does this still fail if you use the full path? It looks like `%{source0}` isn't
getting expanded properly.
Macros are case-sensitive. It's %{SOURCE0}.
- Panu
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 8:48 PM Chris Snyder wrote:
> For dnf plugin writers, what will the migration path look like to switch
> over to be compatible with microdnf?
>
The new Plugins for LIBDNF5 or Microdnf will be required to use the new API
therefore it will be required to rewrite them. The
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-File-Listing` that
you are following:
``
6.15 bump and package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-Listing/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 8:30 AM Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 4/12/22 13:54, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > The new major Microdnf will provide huge improvements and in some
> > cases better behavior then DNF. In the future, the new Microdnf will
> > replace DNF. The new
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 10/216 (x86_64), 12/161 (aarch64)
ID: 1231309 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1231309
ID:
71 matches
Mail list logo
