Germano Massullo wrote on 2022/04/10 22:37:
Thank you very much Mamoru! Why don't you submit your patch to upstream
repository, so you get the credit? We will need to patch such thing upstream
anyways!
Now submitted:
https://github.com/BOINC/boinc/pull/4737
Regards,
Mamoru
# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-05-02
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 1 proposed Final blockers and 5 proposed Final freeze
exception issues to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday.
If you have time this weekend, you
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything much for the agenda. There will be a blocker review
meeting.
If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can run the meeting.
Thanks folks!
--
Adam
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 3:42 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:28 AM Germano Massullo
> wrote:
>>
>> Recent CentOS Stream Qt update broke some EPEL packages like keepassxc
>> that needed a rebuild against the new Qt version.
>> Can we talk about a way to prevent this from
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs18
==
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs18
==
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
On 4/28/22 23:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:38 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/28/22 07:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
>>> wrote:
On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Tue, Apr
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 14:41 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
>
> 1. selinux-policy — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056303 —
> ON_QA
> After upgrade to F36 several packages fail to update due to
> selinux-related errors
>
> selinux-policy updates to address this are in F34, F35, and
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:19 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:28 AM Germano Massullo <
> germano.massu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Recent CentOS Stream Qt update broke some EPEL packages like keepassxc
>> that needed a rebuild against the new Qt version.
>> Can we talk about a
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:14 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> In one week modello package will be updated in rawhide (Fedora 37)
> from version 1.11 to version 2.0.0.
>
> Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053953
> PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/modello/pull-request/4
Bodhi
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:28 AM Germano Massullo <
germano.massu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Recent CentOS Stream Qt update broke some EPEL packages like keepassxc
> that needed a rebuild against the new Qt version.
> Can we talk about a way to prevent this from happening again?
>
> Best regards
>
Missing expected images:
Xfce live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Soas live x86_64
Mate live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/22 (x86_64)
ID: 1247350 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1247350
ID: 1247364 Test: x86_64
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:28 AM Germano Massullo <
germano.massu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Recent CentOS Stream Qt update broke some EPEL packages like keepassxc
> that needed a rebuild against the new Qt version.
> Can we talk about a way to prevent this from happening again?
>
> Best regards
>
>
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 14:28, Germano Massullo
wrote:
> Recent CentOS Stream Qt update broke some EPEL packages like keepassxc
> that needed a rebuild against the new Qt version.
> Can we talk about a way to prevent this from happening again?
>
>
This is the current situation of events for
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:41 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> We are now targeting target date #2 (2022-05-10). If we slip again, we
> won't release until after the Release Party!
That should be target date #3, of course. The date is still 2022-05-10.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program
We are now targeting target date #2 (2022-05-10). If we slip again, we
won't release until after the Release Party!
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. selinux-policy — After upgrade to F36 several packages fail to
update due to selinux-related errors —
Recent CentOS Stream Qt update broke some EPEL packages like keepassxc
that needed a rebuild against the new Qt version.
Can we talk about a way to prevent this from happening again?
Best regards
[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077742
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 08:57 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 6:01 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> >
> > Maybe spend two more letters and write "Proposal" instead of "Change"?
>
> That makes sense. "Change", in this usage, is a proper noun, so while
> all proposals are changes, not
On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 15:36 +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
>
> Do nothing and let them embarrass themselves freely?
> Their target audience is usually smart enough to see through that real quick.
Not The Register's commentariat, anyway. The comments on the Reg
article (which to be fair did use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452
Bug ID: 2080452
Summary: perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-WWW-Mechanize
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 06:01:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:34:48PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > This upstream fix, which is basically a single line addition:
> >
> > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1825/files
> >
> > is very
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 7:21 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:49 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:38 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 4/28/22 07:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080418
Bug ID: 2080418
Summary: perl-Socket-2.033 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Socket
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:17 AM Jered Floyd wrote:
>
>
> This package is now up for review in BZ:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374
>
> There's also a GitHub repo for the packaging:
> https://github.com/jeredfloyd/rpm-trafficserver
>
> I've tested it on f35, and have my
This package is now up for review in BZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374
There's also a GitHub repo for the packaging:
https://github.com/jeredfloyd/rpm-trafficserver
I've tested it on f35, and have my copr repo (
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jered/trafficserver/)
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 22/161 (aarch64), 12/231 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220428.n.0):
ID: 1246329 Test: aarch64
A qui, 28-04-2022 às 15:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto escreveu:
> On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:57 AM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > > A qui, 28-04-2022 às 10:48 +0100, Sérgio Basto escreveu:
> > > > A qua, 27-04-2022 às 16:58 -0700, Troy
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 6:01 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Maybe spend two more letters and write "Proposal" instead of "Change"?
That makes sense. "Change", in this usage, is a proper noun, so while
all proposals are changes, not all proposals are Changes. But given
the context (and the fact that
> Sadly, some of this is due to the "media" organization's need to drive
page views and not journalistic ignorance of the facts that this is just a
proposal.
> I don't know how you fix the underlying revenue enhancement approaches
that have driven hyperbole and attempts to drive engagement and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072972
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:49 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:38 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/28/22 07:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220428.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220429.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 81
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 31.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
José Abílio Matos wrote:
After today's update to openssl-1:3.0.2-4.fc36.x86_64 the problem is
gone. :-)
This means your mail server does not support TLS 1.2. You will have to keep
your system set to crypto-policy LEGACY to connect to the server.
I would recommend contacting your mail
On Monday, 14 March 2022 16.53.18 WEST José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I copied and pasted and while changing the option I left one of those rogue
> characters, keeping always the preffix. :-(
>
>
> I will try and see your suggestion.
After today's update to
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
Week: 25th April - 29th April 2022
If you wish to read
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64), 1/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220428.0):
ID: 1246042 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL:
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
partclone-0.3.20-1.el7
Details about builds:
partclone-0.3.20-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-299147954f)
Utility to clone and restore a
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-667d59a6db
suricata-5.0.9-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
distrobox-1.2.15-1.el8
partclone-0.3.20-1.el8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077281
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077283
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077283
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077281
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220425.0):
ID: 1246016 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1246016
Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64)
perl-YAML-LibYAML-API-0.013 in Fedora 37 changed a license from (GPL+ or
Artistic) to MIT.
Regards, Jitka
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64)
ID: 1245986 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1245986
ID: 1245999 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL:
47 matches
Mail list logo