https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d3f93c62b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-3d64d62de3 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088917
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088923
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089058
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Text-Balanced` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-Balanced/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089058
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089008
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Text-Balanced`
that you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-Balanced/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project:
`perl-PerlIO-via-QuotedPrint` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PerlIO-via-QuotedPrint/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089008
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089003
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089003
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-PerlIO-via-QuotedPrint` that you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PerlIO-via-QuotedPrint/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089003
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088928
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Checker` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Checker/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089058
Bug ID: 2089058
Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999832 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Math-BigInt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088923
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Pod-Checker-1.75-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088923
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-50ad9d19ae has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-50ad9d19ae
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Sun, 22 May 2022 at 15:18, Sandro Mani wrote:
> (apparently the -ow...@fedoraproject.org mails don't work
> anymore?)
>
>
I believe it has been -maintain...@fedoraproject.org for a while,
but I do not know how long.
scotch-maintainers: d...@fedoraproject.org,sm...@fedoraproject.org
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Checker` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Checker/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088928
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Hi
Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with some
initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to gather
some opinions (potentially affected maintainers in CC):
- Should metis get retired? Scotch has a scotchmetis compatibility
library which is
(apparently the -ow...@fedoraproject.org mails don't work anymore?)
On 22.05.22 20:57, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with
some initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to
gather some opinions (potentially affected
On 5/22/22 01:58, Glorious Hellosway via devel wrote:
> That will create a very big performance hit, and disabling SMT will half the
> amount of threads. On the new CPUs with E and P cores, this can significantly
> decrease performance.
Speculative execution mitigations are table stakes if you
Hi
I've now merged the side tag. Remarks:
- opencv failed to build due to noarch -doc subpackage building
differently on different arches. This caused by the intel_va sample only
being included on x86 arches. I've made the -doc subpackge arched to
solve this.
- python-PyMuPDF test fail due
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088917
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-e6bef780e2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-e6bef780e2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088923
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088917
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088574
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088917
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088574
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 35/231 (x86_64), 18/161 (aarch64)
New failures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062562
--- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
For the record, I've filed issue 10802 in releng's pagure instance:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10802
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On Sun, 22 May 2022 at 06:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 10:30:48AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 21/05/2022 20:57, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > > I think Fedora should go use an 0077 umask for this reason.
> >
> > Fedora is a general purpose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088673
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-DKIM-1.20220520-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d3f93c62b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d3f93c62b5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-3d64d62de3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3d64d62de3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089008
Bug ID: 2089008
Summary: perl-Text-Balanced-2.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Balanced
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089008
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
GenericError: File upload failed:
cli-build/1653220928.126135.kPJGWePk/perl-Text-Balanced-2.05-1.fc34.src.rpm
Traceback:
File
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089003
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
GenericError: File upload failed:
cli-build/1653218754.0954716.knYpIRjX/perl-PerlIO-via-QuotedPrint-0.10-1.fc34.src.rpm
Traceback:
File
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089003
Bug ID: 2089003
Summary: perl-PerlIO-via-QuotedPrint-0.10 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PerlIO-via-QuotedPrint
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088971
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-JSON-4.06-1.fc37
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 10:30:48AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 21/05/2022 20:57, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > I think Fedora should go use an 0077 umask for this reason.
>
> Fedora is a general purpose distribution, so umask 0077 will create more
> problems than it solves.
>
>
On Saturday, 21 May 2022 19:31:59 BST Glorious Hellosway via devel wrote:
> For `slab_nomerge`, it can lead to very slight increase of kernel memory.
> `init_on_alloc=1` has a almost no performance impact, it is under 1% and is
> usually within standard error, but there is bug with zfs that can
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220521.0):
ID: 1275696 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 21/05/2022 03:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
I think we should complete the transition to 0022 umask.
+1 to 0022.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On 21/05/2022 20:57, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
I think Fedora should go use an 0077 umask for this reason.
Fedora is a general purpose distribution, so umask 0077 will create more
problems than it solves.
Also by default the /home directories have 0700 chmod so no one but the
owner can
Hi,
i wrote:
> > If test_oldlayout.iso does not boot, then i am quite clueless.
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> I'm afraid that this is the case.
What a naughty machine. :))
I'll think about making a BIOS-only GRUB ISO, just for testing.
(Am busy with finding out how to merge the two
That will create a very big performance hit, and disabling SMT will half the
amount of threads. On the new CPUs with E and P cores, this can significantly
decrease performance.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
52 matches
Mail list logo
