čt 14. 7. 2022 v 19:29 odesílatel Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> napsal:
> On 14/07/2022 14:59, Jan Grulich wrote:
> > This means that all the upcoming releases of Qt 5 are meant to be bugfix
> > releases and therefore no API/ABI changes are expected. For that reason
>
Hi everyone.
My name is Rommel, I work at Aiven, and we are looking at packaging the
open source libraries we use.
Here is my first review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107403
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102191
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-Firebird-1.34-4.fc |perl-DBD-Firebird-1.34-4.fc
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-463787a597
seamonkey-2.53.13-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
rpki-client-7.9-1.el7
Details about builds:
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7ac96d02aa
seamonkey-2.53.13-1.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fb8ccb0976
suricata-5.0.10-1.el8
The following builds have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102191
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-Firebird-1.34-4.fc |perl-DBD-Firebird-1.34-4.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102687
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099976
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102191
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 12:58 -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> +ntfs2btrfs
I just rebuilt this one in the sidetag.
Cheers
Davide
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 22/07/14 03:29PM, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> Can anyone advise as to what the policy should be when a package is reviewed
> and approved but never imported?
I already answered Mark's question on Matrix, but for the benefit of
everyone else, there is a policy here:
On 22/07/14 07:32PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 11/07/2022 18:21, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > I don’t believe this list is nearly complete. Two packages I maintain
> > that would be affected (fmidi and giada) are absent from the list.
>
> It's very strange:
>
> $ dnf repoquery -q
On 12/07/2022 22:13, Ben Beasley wrote:
Both bear and fmidi are now rebuilt into the side tag. I defined the
preprocessor macro FMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM as a temporary workaround
(noting that this will not be available in fmt 10.0).
It was fixed by upstream[1]. I think maintainer should
On 11/07/2022 18:50, Ben Beasley wrote:
If that FTBFS rate is typical of the full set of affected packages, then
merging the side tag without resolving the API incompatibilities in
dependent packages will be pretty disruptive to Rawhide as a whole.
I want to merge everything before the Fedora
On 11/07/2022 18:21, Ben Beasley wrote:
I don’t believe this list is nearly complete. Two packages I maintain
that would be affected (fmidi and giada) are absent from the list.
It's very strange:
$ dnf repoquery -q --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo="*"
--qf="%{name}"
On 14/07/2022 14:59, Jan Grulich wrote:
This means that all the upcoming releases of Qt 5 are meant to be bugfix
releases and therefore no API/ABI changes are expected. For that reason
we have decided to no longer depend on the exact version of Qt that apps
were built against.
Are you sure?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107239
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 13/239 (x86_64), 80/167 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220713.n.0):
ID: 1325161 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107239
Bug ID: 2107239
Summary: perl-IO-Compress-2.201-1.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test
'ZLIB_VERSION (1.2.11) matches
Compress::Zlib::zlib_version'
Product: Fedora
Version:
On 7/11/22 07:31, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 4:15 AM Jerry James wrote:
The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. The parser
Thanx a lot for sharing the thoughts.
generators, which are written in Java, will
Hi,
I'm now working on Qt 5.15.5 update in Rawhide. As you probably know, Qt
5.15 is the last major release of Qt 5 and all the development is now
focused to Qt 6. This means that all the upcoming releases of Qt 5 are
meant to be bugfix releases and therefore no API/ABI changes are expected.
For
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
--- Comment #16 from Petr Pisar ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #15)
> The BadFont probably means that xblast-x11 requests a font which is not
> installed.
It's this bug #2107144 in xblast. A workaround is deleting ~/.xblast_tnt
Can anyone advise as to what the policy should be when a package is
reviewed and approved but never imported?
This is the second one of these I have come across recently:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2031922 was
approved ~5 months ago and has gone nowhere since and it
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220713.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220714.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 87
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.84 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
--- Comment #15 from Petr Pisar ---
xblast-x11 does not use SDL at all. The BadFont probably means that xblast-x11
requests a font which is not installed.
To test SDL1, you need to execute xblats-sdl program from xblast package.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
--- Comment #14 from Sergio Basto ---
testing xblast-x11 not xblast on my F35 (and F36 I tested in a vm)
gdb xblast-x11
run
could not load font 24
could not load font 18
could not load font 14
X Error of failed request: BadFont (invalid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102674
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
Hi, I can take care of the build if you grant me access. My FAS username is
jplesnik.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102635
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
Hi, I can take care of the build if you grant me access. My FAS username is
jplesnik.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102646
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
Hi, I can take care of the build if you grant me access. My FAS username is
jplesnik.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220713.0):
ID: 1324961 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1324961
ID: 1324962 Test: aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
--- Comment #13 from Petr Pisar ---
(In reply to Sergio Basto from comment #10)
> yes inside a virtual-machine (virtualbox vm)
>
> what I notice is a mixup of SDL1 with SDL2
>
> SDL_SetVideoMode (width=width@entry=640,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|1 |0
#1896977 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment #12 is|1 |0
private|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|perl-SDL|SDL2
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1896084 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
--- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ---
Installing libXi fixes the crash for me. (Again kvm-virtalized F37 with X11
server on F35.)
If I uninstall libXi and install patched SDL2, the crash goes away in a
windowed mode (frozen-bubble
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220713.0):
ID: 1324887 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1324887
ID: 1324888 Test: aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099976
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102581
--- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
perl-SQL-Abstract-2.01-8.el9 - enable bootstrap
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102581
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102687
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
--- Comment #10 from Sergio Basto ---
yes inside a virtual-machine (virtualbox vm)
what I notice is a mixup of SDL1 with SDL2
SDL_SetVideoMode (width=width@entry=640, height=height@entry=480,
bpp=, bpp@entry=24,
flags12=) at
Il 13/07/22 21:11, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> My 2 cents... we should try and get bodhi (and the rest of the pipeline)
> to work with these large updates if at all possible.
>
> Having releng merge tags works of course, but as Adam pointed out, it
> skips our CI and feedback testing area.
42 matches
Mail list logo
