Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

On 7/24/22 16:40, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: Hi all, As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4  to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8. This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we expect all dependent packages to be

Re: repoquery-fu (was Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora)

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 2:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 7:47 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > - the sets of dependent packages overlap between concurrently created side > > tags > > So what? If we're not tracking rebuilds in Git anymore, this is no > longer a serious

Re: empty reply from server error

On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 16:47 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 01:47:12PM +, Globe Trotter via devel napsal(a): > > However, I get the following error in the build log (of koji): > > > > > > > > checking whether the C compiler works... no > > configure: error: in

[Bug 2029995] perl.req: use keywords not found on BEGIN { lines

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029995 --- Comment #4 from Charles R. Anderson --- Created attachment 1899053 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1899053=edit proposed fix including test cases -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2110225] New: perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110225 Bug ID: 2110225 Summary: perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.94 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Devel-CheckOS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

On 22/07/24 06:05PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > If ODE 0.16 was only built as part of the mass rebuild and wasn't > available in the buildroot during the mass rebuild (and I don't think > it was), then all the other packages that depend on it were still > built against the older ODE 0.14 version as

[Bug 2029995] perl.req: use keywords not found on BEGIN { lines

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029995 Charles R. Anderson changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-base Needs to be a |perl.req: use keywords not

Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:41 PM Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > Hi all, > > As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from > libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4 to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8. > > This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we expect > all

[Bug 2029995] perl-base Needs to be a Required Dependency

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029995 Charles R. Anderson changed: What|Removed |Added Component|perl|perl-generators --- Comment #3

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:45 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/24 22:42: > > glib2 switched to pcre2 in rawhide recently. Can you check if qemu needs > to > > be updated for that now so that it BuildRequires pcre2-static instead? > > > > >

[Bug 2029995] perl-base Needs to be a Required Dependency

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029995 --- Comment #2 from Charles R. Anderson --- More importantly, perl's subpackage perl-Module-Loaded is missing the "Requires: perl(base)": >rpm -q --requires perl-Module-Loaded | grep base [no output] -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 2029995] perl-base Needs to be a Required Dependency

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029995 Charles R. Anderson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||caillon+fedoraproject@gmail

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/24 22:42: On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote: glib2 switched to pcre2 in rawhide recently. Can you check if qemu needs to be updated for that now so that it BuildRequires pcre2-static instead?

Heads-up: ODE soname bump

Hi all, As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4  to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8. This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we expect all dependent packages to be automatically built again during this process.

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > Il sab 23 lug 2022, 19:12 Adam Williamson ha > scritto: > >> This of course begs a question: did qemu also have a non-static pcre >> requirement at the time? But it seems not: >> >> [adamw@xps13k qemu (f36 %)]$ git show

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220724.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220723.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220724.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 60 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 1010.54 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

The performance impact of various debug options on Fedora Rawhide debug kernels

The current Fedora Rawhide kernels are too slow to run libguestfs tests when doing Koji builds. These run in a qemu VM, running the Rawhide kernel, emulated using software virtualization (ie. TCG). They now time out because these kernels are so slow. Until fairly recently they were slow but

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

Il sab 23 lug 2022, 19:12 Adam Williamson ha scritto: > This of course begs a question: did qemu also have a non-static pcre > requirement at the time? But it seems not: > > [adamw@xps13k qemu (f36 %)]$ git show 0835325:qemu.spec | grep pcre > BuildRequires: glibc-static pcre-static glib2-static