Welcome Joel!
On 9/8/22 02:42, Joel Savitz wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am a software engineer at Red Hat working on the kernel.
Over the past three years, I've been leading a program that has evolved
into a pipeline to get interested people into kernel development with
emphasis on improving
# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-09-12
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 6 proposed Final blockers and 6 proposed Final
freeze exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting.
If you have time this weekend, you can take a look
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2022-09-12
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, and the Beta release has been
signed off, so let's get together
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100151
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100151
Bug 2100151 depends on bug 2100167, which changed state.
Bug 2100167 Summary: Upgrade biblatex to 3.18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100167
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100151
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-99d62f3ec5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-99d62f3ec5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Friday, September 9, 2022 Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> I found it useful to ship the nextcloud package as a module, particularly in
> EPEL, but if after multiple years there really are only 12 packages in the
> repo and even those may or may not work then that is a pretty clear
> argument for
On Friday, September 9, 2022 Vít Ondruch wrote:
> However, I think that the idea is that whatever should be said about the
> CVE should be said in the main tracer. The fedora tracker should be used
> just to not forget to fix this in Fedora.
Why not both? We shouldn't have to reference two
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045863
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Status|ON_QA
I found it useful to ship the nextcloud package as a module, particularly in
EPEL, but if after multiple years there really are only 12 packages in the repo
and even those may or may not work then that is a pretty clear argument for
eating the sunk cost & abandoning the idea.
-- Christopher
Hi,
On 9/9/22 15:05, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> On 9/9/22 13:50, Leigh Scott wrote:
>>
>>> Also note that you will also need to create a kmod package for
>>> the also out of tree v4l2-loopback kernel driver. The closed-source
>>> userspace bits Intel provide only work with gstreamer. So the
>>>
lsyncd and autossh - already in epel9
geoip - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066787
"Please do NOT branch GeoIP for EPEL 9, because MaxMind, the GeoIP
upstream, has clearly declared the end of life for GeoIP"
webalizer - nobody has asked for it. And maybe someone needs to port
On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 09:14, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 8:40 AM Stephen Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 08:09, lejeczek via CentOS-devel <
> centos-de...@centos.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi guys.
> >>
> >> that most certainly should not be, right?
> >>
> >>
On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 08:59, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> I’m having an issue trying to get Swift 5.6.3 built on EPEL-8, even though
> it builds fine for everything else (Rawhide, F36, F35, EPEL-9): “undefined
> reference to 'std::__throw_bad_array_new_length()’”.
>
>
On 9/9/22 13:50, Leigh Scott wrote:
Also note that you will also need to create a kmod package for
the also out of tree v4l2-loopback kernel driver. The closed-source
userspace bits Intel provide only work with gstreamer. So the
way this is used on other distros is with a little helper process
Hey all-
I’m having an issue trying to get Swift 5.6.3 built on EPEL-8, even though it
builds fine for everything else (Rawhide, F36, F35, EPEL-9): “undefined
reference to 'std::__throw_bad_array_new_length()’”.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91757790
Never saw this issue
OLD: Fedora-37-20220908.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220909.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 10:47 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Nevertheless, this might soon become non issue given:
I think that that may depend on one's definition of "soon",
but I do agree that it would be useful to understand how
CVE tracking bug workflow is being considered to be
handled in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125112
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100151
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team.
The report could be found at https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/
cpe-weekly-update---week-36-2022/.
If you want to receive weekly reports by emails in the future, please
subscribe to either
> Also note that you will also need to create a kmod package for
> the also out of tree v4l2-loopback kernel driver. The closed-source
> userspace bits Intel provide only work with gstreamer. So the
> way this is used on other distros is with a little helper process
> which runs a
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 6:55 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:21:53 +0200
> Iker Pedrosa wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's a PAM bugzilla <
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124059>
> > that complains about not being able to update to its latest version.
> There
> > seems
Hi Vratislav,
On 9/9/22 11:42, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> Hello,
> I got a new Dell XPS laptop with the "amazing" [1] Intel MIPI IPU6 webcam.
> There are upstream repos with drivers [2] and user-space stuff and Ubuntu [3]
> and Arch [4] have user repositories with everything required packaged.
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220908.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220909.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 294
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.94 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 10:43 AM Vratislav Podzimek
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I got a new Dell XPS laptop with the "amazing" [1] Intel MIPI IPU6
> webcam. There are upstream repos with drivers [2] and user-space stuff
> and Ubuntu [3] and Arch [4] have user repositories with everything
> required
Dne 08. 09. 22 v 19:32 Maxwell G via devel napsal(a):
On Thursday, September 8, 2022 Neal Gompa wrote:
Fedora maintainers are CC'd often on the parent bug to bypass the
private bug status while a bug is "under development". This has
happened a few times for me as a maintainer of
Separate drivers for the kernel aren't permitted in fedora, try submitting a
review request at rpmfusion.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124537
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-HTML-Tiny-1.08-1.fc38
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124931
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124931
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-HTML-Tiny-1.08-1.fc38
Hello,
I got a new Dell XPS laptop with the "amazing" [1] Intel MIPI IPU6
webcam. There are upstream repos with drivers [2] and user-space stuff
and Ubuntu [3] and Arch [4] have user repositories with everything
required packaged. I found nothing available for Fedora so before I go
and spend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124931
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
33 matches
Mail list logo
