[EPEL-devel] Re: Should we retire weechat from EPEL 7?

On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 07:11:19PM +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 7:03 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > We should probably retire weechat from EPEL 7 - it has multiple CVEs > > that can only be fixed by updating to versions >= 3.5, but the spec no > >

Re: Heads up! OpenImageIO 2.4 series coming to rawhide

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:26 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Send us the sidetag as Blender and openshadinglanguage need update. > You can use f38-build-side-59007 I've already built OIIO and wait-repo is done. I'll probably finish the builds tomorrow since it's getting late here. Thanks, Richard

Re: Heads up! OpenImageIO 2.4 series coming to rawhide

Send us the sidetag as Blender and openshadinglanguage need update. Thanks. On 2022-10-06 18:14, Richard Shaw wrote: All builds will be done in a side tag. I don't expect any issues. I'd like to update f37 as well unless there are any objections. Thanks, Richard

fedpkg new-sources errors

I'm still getting this on occasion and have no idea what the issue is: $ fedpkg new-sources OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz Uploading: OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz # 52.0%Could not execute new_sources: (56, 'OpenSSL SSL_read: error:0A0003FC:SSL routines::sslv3 alert

Heads up! OpenImageIO 2.4 series coming to rawhide

All builds will be done in a side tag. I don't expect any issues. I'd like to update f37 as well unless there are any objections. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: F37 Final blocker status update

The Go/No-Go for the early target date is Thursday. In order to be ready, we need blockers to be resolved by Tuesday at the latest. Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. abrt — Abrt does not report a segfault which is reported in journalctl. — ASSIGNED

[Bug 2132841] New: perl-HTTP-Message-6.38 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132841 Bug ID: 2132841 Summary: perl-HTTP-Message-6.38 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTTP-Message Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Fedora Linux 37 Final Go/No-Go meeting next week

The Fedora Linux 37 Final Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday 13 October at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will determine the status of the F37 Final for the 18 October early target date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the wiki[3]. Currently, we

[Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 37 Final Go/No-Go meeting next week

The Fedora Linux 37 Final Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday 13 October at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will determine the status of the F37 Final for the 18 October early target date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the wiki[3]. Currently, we

F38 proposal: Deprecate python-toml (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePythonToml This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

F38 proposal: Deprecate python-toml (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePythonToml This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

[Bug 2132803] New: perl-URI-5.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132803 Bug ID: 2132803 Summary: perl-URI-5.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-URI Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: When is a file dependency appropriate?

On 06. 10. 22 15:04, Kalev Lember wrote: I guess a transition plan (if we make up our minds that it makes sense to do it) could be to first make sure the provides are autogenerated, then do a mass rebuild, let people try it out in their packages for 6 months, and then provenpackager-edit all

Re: Grub menu with 3 kernels by default

Daniel P. Berrangé writes: > We need PCRs to cover at minimum > > 1. Machine firmware > 2. Bootloader(s) > 3. Bootloader configuration > 4. Booted kernel > 5. Booted initrd > 6. Booted cmdline > Item 5 and 6 are a problem, because as mentioned thse are not signed > by the OS vendor

[EPEL-devel] Re: Should we retire weechat from EPEL 7?

On Thu Oct 6, 2022 at 19:11 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > The cmake3 package has all the macros from the mainline cmake package in > Fedora. > > It should be fully compatible, just swap %cmake_* for %cmake3_*. Oops, I responded before I saw this. -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His

[EPEL-devel] Re: Should we retire weechat from EPEL 7?

On Thu Oct 6, 2022 at 12:02 CDT, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > I'm not sure either Paul or myself really care enough about EL7 to > maintain a divergent spec. The %cmake3* macros work everywhere. -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[EPEL-devel] Re: Should we retire weechat from EPEL 7?

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 7:03 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Hi all, > > We should probably retire weechat from EPEL 7 - it has multiple CVEs > that can only be fixed by updating to versions >= 3.5, but the spec no > longer works on EPEL 7 thanks to macros like `%cmake_build` not being >

[EPEL-devel] Should we retire weechat from EPEL 7?

Hi all, We should probably retire weechat from EPEL 7 - it has multiple CVEs that can only be fixed by updating to versions >= 3.5, but the spec no longer works on EPEL 7 thanks to macros like `%cmake_build` not being available. https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/weechat I'm not sure either Paul or

Re: Grub menu with 3 kernels by default

On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 10:45:40AM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé writes: > > > The way grub has to write its entire grub.conf into the TPM PCRs is > > totally impractical for anyone wishing to maintain attestation > > policies to verify the OS boot state from the TPM

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: Dropping modules from EPEL-8. Not adding modules to EPEL-9

On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 17:08, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some support for modules with the > hope that a module ecosystem could be built from Fedora packages using RHEL > modules as an underlying tool. This has never happened and we have ended up > with a

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1ee1fe2c17 libopenmpt-0.6.6-1.el9 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-46-1.el9

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8 Modules get the axe on Halloween 2022

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 3:09 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some support for modules with the > hope that a module ecosystem could be built from Fedora packages using RHEL > modules as an underlying tool. This has never happened and we have ended up > with a

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-de23d337b0 libopenmpt-0.6.6-1.el7 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-66467c33ea seamonkey-2.53.14-3.el7 1

Re: Grub menu with 3 kernels by default

Daniel P. Berrangé writes: > The way grub has to write its entire grub.conf into the TPM PCRs is > totally impractical for anyone wishing to maintain attestation > policies to verify the OS boot state from the TPM eventlog. So this has been mentioned in several places, but no one in grub

[Bug 2132720] Upgrade perl-Test-Unit-Lite to 0.1202

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132720 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Paul

Re: Has the final freeze for f37 started?

Hi, yes the freeze started on the scheduled date and time. Please create releng ticket with packages that require blocking in koji. On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 3:25 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi all, > > I retired some packages from f37 and rawhide on Tuesday and Wednesday, > but their retirements

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:11 AM Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > Some of mine: > > - `dnf repoquery` -- Currently, `dnf5 repoquery` nowhere near meets the > capabilities of the old version. This is the most important to me. I agree, repoquery is an absolutely essential tool for me. Without it, it

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 13:53 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:20:47PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > Hi Fedorians, > > > > I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria > > that > > dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf.

Has the final freeze for f37 started?

Hi all, I retired some packages from f37 and rawhide on Tuesday and Wednesday, but their retirements were no longer processed correctly. After looking at the F37 schedule, the Final Freeze for Fedora 37 should have started two days ago (14:00 UTC on 2022-10-04), which might explain this (at least

[Bug 2132720] New: Upgrade perl-Test-Unit-Lite to 0.1202

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132720 Bug ID: 2132720 Summary: Upgrade perl-Test-Unit-Lite to 0.1202 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Test-Unit-Lite Status: NEW

Re: When is a file dependency appropriate?

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 2:51 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 06. 10. 22 v 14:38 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:05 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> BTW re-reading the ticket and since there are talks about DNF5, maybe it >> would be worth of reopening the discussion. I think we

[Bug 2132717] New: Upgrade perl-Net-DNS-SEC to 1.20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132717 Bug ID: 2132717 Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-DNS-SEC to 1.20 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Net-DNS-SEC Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2132704] New: Upgrade perl-Image-Info to 1.43

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132704 Bug ID: 2132704 Summary: Upgrade perl-Image-Info to 1.43 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Image-Info Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 1937653] Upgrade perl-HTTP-OAI to 4.12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937653 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Upgrade perl-HTTP-OAI to|Upgrade perl-HTTP-OAI to

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:20:47PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > Hi Fedorians, > > I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria that > dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf. > > The DNF maintainers have their list of requirements, but it would be >

Re: When is a file dependency appropriate?

Dne 06. 10. 22 v 14:38 Kalev Lember napsal(a): On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:05 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: BTW re-reading the ticket and since there are talks about DNF5, maybe it would be worth of reopening the discussion. I think we could generally do better and I see two

Re: When is a file dependency appropriate?

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:05 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > BTW re-reading the ticket and since there are talks about DNF5, maybe it > would be worth of reopening the discussion. I think we could generally > do better and I see two options: > > 1) There seems to be a way to download additional data if

Re: When is a file dependency appropriate?

Dne 06. 10. 22 v 14:18 Panu Matilainen napsal(a): On 10/6/22 11:55, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 06. 10. 22 v 9:18 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a): Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 6.10.2022 klo 2.33: On 06. 10. 22 1:21, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: Recently, I have run into some cases where file dependencies like

Fedora 37 compose report: 20221006.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-37-20221005.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20221006.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: When is a file dependency appropriate?

On 10/6/22 11:55, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 06. 10. 22 v 9:18 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a): Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 6.10.2022 klo 2.33: On 06. 10. 22 1:21, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: Recently, I have run into some cases where file dependencies like Requires: /usr/bin/foo are used. In a recent

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2022-10-07 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10133/ ___ devel

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221006.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221005.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221006.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 194 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.11 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Grub menu with 3 kernels by default

On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 10:13:58AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/5/22 23:07, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 3:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> 3. "Boot menu" in GUI? Given that one can reach the GUI, why it should > >> not be possible to choose the

Re: Grub menu with 3 kernels by default

On 06-10-2022 10:13, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 10/5/22 23:07, Chris Murphy wrote: On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 3:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: 3. "Boot menu" in GUI? Given that one can reach the GUI, why it should not be possible to choose the boot entry for next boot? Or even choose to open FW

Re: When is a file dependency appropriate?

Dne 06. 10. 22 v 10:55 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 06. 10. 22 v 9:18 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a): Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 6.10.2022 klo 2.33: On 06. 10. 22 1:21, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: Recently, I have run into some cases where file dependencies like Requires: /usr/bin/foo are used. In a

Re: When is a file dependency appropriate?

Dne 06. 10. 22 v 9:18 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a): Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 6.10.2022 klo 2.33: On 06. 10. 22 1:21, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: Recently, I have run into some cases where file dependencies like Requires: /usr/bin/foo are used. In a recent thread on this mailing list [1], it is

Re: Grub menu with 3 kernels by default

Hi, On 10/5/22 23:07, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 3:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> 3. "Boot menu" in GUI? Given that one can reach the GUI, why it should >> not be possible to choose the boot entry for next boot? Or even choose >> to open FW setup. > > This could solve

Re: Grub menu with 3 kernels by default

Hi, On 10/5/22 20:56, Christopher Klooz wrote: > > On 05/10/2022 20:28, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 10/5/22 19:59, Christopher Klooz wrote: >>> On 05/10/2022 18:39, Christopher Klooz wrote: On 05/10/2022 17:33, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 11:16 AM, Christopher

Re: When is a file dependency appropriate?

Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 6.10.2022 klo 2.33: On 06. 10. 22 1:21, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: Recently, I have run into some cases where file dependencies like Requires: /usr/bin/foo are used. In a recent thread on this mailing list [1], it is mentioned that such Requires should be avoided, because