[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-47a8accb45 trafficserver-9.1.4-1.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-5564c168f5 w3m-0.5.3-58.git20220429.el8 The following

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8362ddfe7c trafficserver-9.1.4-1.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-65548d9891 w3m-0.5.3-58.git20220429.el7 The following

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-53c9c8c84a trafficserver-9.1.4-1.el9 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e4e5ecabcf w3m-0.5.3-58.git20220429.el9 The following

[Bug 2153171] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.57 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153171 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.57 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.57

[Bug 2156168] New: perl-ExtUtils-Install-2.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156168 Bug ID: 2156168 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-Install-2.22 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-ExtUtils-Install Keywords: FutureFeature,

Re: Is there convenient way to setup Fedora compilation flags outside of the RPM build?

* Vít Ondruch: > Working with upstream on one issue [1], it seems that the culprit is in > the Fedora compiler options. Is there some convenient way to set them > up? Of course I can copy them from log, or somehow put together from the > RPM macros, but I'd appreciate if there was some easier

Re: Orphaned X11 packages

> On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 15:12 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > X Display Manager with support for XDMCP, host chooser > > what are the alternatives of "Display Manager" ? and "with support for > XDMCP" ? only gdm ? > > And xdm is not abandoned https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/xdm , >

Re: Orphaned X11 packages

On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 15:12 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > xorg-x11-xdm X Display Manager with support for XDMCP, host chooser what are the alternatives of "Display Manager" ? and "with support for XDMCP" ? only gdm ? And xdm is not abandoned https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/xdm , maybe

Re: F38 proposal: Unified Kernel Support Phase 1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

> On 12/22/22 15:39, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > Well, the thing with a chain of trust is the fact that the only chain > the user can trust is the one that he himself or the host device he owns > and operates generated that trust of chain, from link 0 in that chain. ( > And we all know

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221224.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221223.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221224.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 39 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:26.30 MiB

Re: F38 proposal: Unified Kernel Support Phase 1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 12/22/22 15:39, Lennart Poettering wrote: Well, the thing is: a chain of trust is a*chain*, hence you must ultimately hook validation to what the firmware provides you with as root. And that ultimately is the SecureBoot db on commodity hardware. Well, the thing with a chain of trust is