OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230202.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230202.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 82
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 54.41 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
As a heads up - openmpi 5.0.0 drops support for 32-bit builds [1]. I'm
not sure how far away it is from release - we're on rc10 at the moment.
Affected packages seem to be:
amg4psblas-1.1.0-4.fc38.src.rpm
arbor-0.7-4.fc38.src.rpm
auryn-0.8.2-15.fc38.src.rpm
boost-1.78.0-11.fc38.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165007
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-9edf5be389 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On Fri Feb 3, 2023 at 01:42 +, Maxwell G wrote:
> (see the attachment)
Here it is!
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
diff --git a/blocker.patch b/blocker.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..76999f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blocker.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+From
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165007
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On Fri Feb 3, 2023 at 02:00 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 02. 23 17:06, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > # Create a blank ''blocker'' package that Conflicts with the to be
> > removed packages.
> > # Create a new Copr with the blocker package in its default buildroot.
> > This will simulate the actual
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162728
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162740
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162728
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162740
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023
On 02. 02. 23 17:06, Ben Cotton wrote:
# Create a blank ''blocker'' package that Conflicts with the to be
removed packages.
# Create a new Copr with the blocker package in its default buildroot.
This will simulate the actual removal of these packages.
Was this verified to actually work that
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:21:03PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 1/31/23 11:03, Maxwell G wrote:
> > On Tue Jan 31, 2023 at 15:01 +0200, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > > Hi, Orion
> > > Thanks for raising this question.
> >
> > Indeed!
> >
> > > I wonder if it's possible to
On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 13:44 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
> If you see a package that should be exempted from the process,
> please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for
> that.
>
> If you see a package that can be
As the MR is now merged, it is a good time to make sure that everyone
is aware. As of 6.2-rc5, Rawhide is no longer forcing a debug build
with any kernels. All rawhide kernels are now built just like stable
Fedora kernels, with both non-debug and debug variations. This
change was necessary
A neat thing you can play around with is the color profiles, you can have
kernel stack frames in one color, C / C++ userspace stack frames in another
color, Java / Node / Python stack frames in another color, etc.
https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2017-07-30/coloring-flamegraphs-code-type.html
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 06:05:44PM -, Daniel Alley wrote:
> Perhaps this would be amenable to a blog post demonstrating the benefits?
> e.g.
>
> * What does the system performance analysis process look like, how to get
> started
> * What impacts does the lack of frame pointer information
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 5:21 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> On 1/31/23 14:00, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> Proposals that are rejected may be submitted by reconsideration, but they
> >> must go through whatever process was originally required before FESCo
> >> begins voting. For example, this means a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166725
Bug ID: 2166725
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Email-Valid in epel9.
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-Valid
Assignee:
Perhaps this would be amenable to a blog post demonstrating the benefits? e.g.
* What does the system performance analysis process look like, how to get
started
* What impacts does the lack of frame pointer information have on the outputs
(incoherent / invisible / inaccurate data), and how
I’m sorry for not answering sooner! I’ll be glad to receive help with the
current state of the package. Thanks in advance
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 14:41 Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 12:14 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 02. 02. 23 0:46, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
>
On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 12:14 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 02. 23 0:46, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > > datamash jhladky
> >
> > I have a build fix ready and
On Wed, Feb 1 2023 at 08:41:55 PM -0800, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
Is the current plan to support the PackageKit API in the dnf daemon,
or
to port packagekit's dnf backend to the dnf5 API?
Red Hat is currently planning to port everything we care about that
uses PackageKit to use dnfdaemon's
If COPR's stats are to be believed, some of you have found my cinnamon-epel
repo. Please note that these packages are now available in epel-testing:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bfed058207
To test, on top of a Server with GUI:
dnf install --enablerepo=epel-testing
Hi,
I have spend some quality time bringing rubygem-railties test suite
up2date and this resulted in dropping the dependency on
rubygem-jquery-rails. Nothing else in Fedora depends on that package and
therefore I orphaned it and I suggest to let it go.
Since I don't maintain
Dne 02. 02. 23 v 17:20 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 01. 02. 23 v 23:25 Reon Beon via devel napsal(a):
There seems to be support now in
rpm:https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2022
Where? When following the link, it leads to the hole of anothers
issues, and refences.
Dne 01. 02. 23 v 13:56 Milan Crha napsal(a):
Hi,
this is a query for an opinion and a best-practice experience for a
case when a package needs to change its internal database format
between versions, in an environment, which does not allow real
That being said, any such change
Dne 01. 02. 23 v 23:25 Reon Beon via devel napsal(a):
There seems to be support now in
rpm:https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2022
Where? When following the link, it leads to the hole of anothers issues, and
refences. But I see no merged PR.
Miroslav
Dne 02. 02. 23 v 5:41 Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
The change proposal calls for dnf5 to be ready by the time that F39 is
branched, on Aug 8 of this year.
Right now, I don't see any documentation for plugins, the general API docs are (subjectively) terse, and the DNF5 git
repo has a banner with
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Retire_Golang_Leaves
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Retire_Golang_Leaves
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158089
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
Michal, I can maintain this package in EPEL9. Can you give me the permission to
dist-git?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165007
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-9edf5be389 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9edf5be389
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165007
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-932a9313fc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-932a9313fc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for andymenderunix (Andy
Mender). Does anyone know how to contact Andy?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166645
Thanks,
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165007
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
I was doing some perf analysis for the first time in a few weeks, and
it is so much clearer now that I can use Rawhide packages compiled
with frame pointers. Makes it much easier to analyse Flame Graphs
when I can just update libraries to Rawhide instead of having to
recompile them all myself
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230201.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230202.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 350
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.79 GiB
Size of dropped packages
On 02. 02. 23 0:46, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
datamashjhladky
I have a build fix ready and volunteer to maintain it such that I can
apply it.
My FAS handle is: gsauthof
Can you add
- all 31.01.2023, 12:44, "Miro Hrončok" :howl atim, pwalterI took over howl that was orphaned a few weeks ago and now rescued it and fixed it to build from source. I also created a fedora flatpak for it as it was missing. Pete___
devel mailing list --
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 38 Rawhide 20230202.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 5:42 AM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 2023-02-01 13:38, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > #2870 Change proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2870
> > APPROVED (+6,0,-0)
>
>
> (Fixed the link above)
>
> The change proposal calls for dnf5 to be
Hi all,
we have new year, new merged PRs, therefore I made a new build and
pushed new release.
Give it a moment to propagate.
You can preview the changes using this URL before the prod release
propagates:
https://developer.stg.fedoraproject.org/
Notable changes:
* Update .NET docs for
Dne 02. 02. 23 v 0:46 Georg Sauthoff napsal(a):
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
datamashjhladky
I have a build fix ready and volunteer to maintain it such that I can
apply it.
My FAS handle is: gsauthof
Can
On Thursday, 02 February 2023 at 03:53, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:45 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
>
> > tpm2-tss-engine mzavalavz
>
> I can fix this (up-lift to the current
44 matches
Mail list logo
