https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158089
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
AMF-1.4.29-1.el7
nmh-1.8RC3-1.el7
Details about builds:
AMF-1.4.29-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fe7cbf0043)
Advanced Media Framework
On 27. 09. 22 19:41, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 09. 22 17:55, Sandro wrote:
On 27-09-2022 08:17, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Make sure that the build does not use the pyx file from upstream. It
seems to me that the file generated by Cython is in the source tarball
(skmisc/loess/src/_loess.pyx) and I
Hello, the mass branching of Fedora Linux 38 was planned to happen on
2023-02-07.
Due to traveling from FOSDEM and the re-signing of rawhide with a new
key we will postpone the branching to 2023-02-08.
Sorry for the inconvenience
Tomas Hrcka
Fedora release engineering
Hello, the mass branching of Fedora Linux 38 was planned to happen on
2023-02-07.
Due to traveling from FOSDEM and the re-signing of rawhide with a new
key we will postpone the branching to 2023-02-08.
Sorry for the inconvenience
Tomas Hrcka
Fedora release engineering
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I plan to orphan the packages now, so maintainers who want to fix them can
take them, and rerun the check later this week.
It is not enough to unorphan a package to save it from retirement, it must
also be built in rawhide.
In case you want to postpone a
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:56:50AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 2023-02-06 07:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Why was this line added?
> >
> > + Requires: (fedora-release > 38-0.23 if fedora-release)
> >
> > I suppose it's related to this change in fedora-release:
> >
> >
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 17:25 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 06. 02. 23 17:14, Kalev Lember wrote:
> >
> > * libmodulemd1 (kalev, 15:26:37)
> > * yselkowitz[m] to look into fixing libmodulemd1 FTBFS (kalev,
> > 15:40:02)
> > * Owen to talk to Jan to see how far along fedmod
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately this week, i.e. around 2023-02-08.
Since this
It looks good to me.
Thanks for doing that.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 9:26 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> The python-qt5 package in RHEL 8 does not ship the webkit package. I'm
> assuming that this is unlikely to be changed since qt5-qtwebkit isn't in
> RHEL but is in EPEL.
>
> I think I'm close
On 06. 02. 23 17:14, Kalev Lember wrote:
* libmodulemd1 (kalev, 15:26:37)
* yselkowitz[m] to look into fixing libmodulemd1 FTBFS (kalev,
15:40:02)
* Owen to talk to Jan to see how far along fedmod replacement is
(kalev, 15:40:28)
* ACTION: tpopela to to talk to Jan to see
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately this week, i.e. around 2023-02-08.
Since this
=
#fedora-meeting: Fedora Flatpak Packaging SIG
=
Meeting started by kalev at 15:00:13 UTC. The full logs are available at
On 2023-02-06 07:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Why was this line added?
+ Requires: (fedora-release > 38-0.23 if fedora-release)
I suppose it's related to this change in fedora-release:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/c/096fc7da49de5655db7aad17057e32191f2afe59?branch=rawhide
So I think related to this thread, libvirt is now uninstallable in
Rawhide:
DEBUG util.py:443: Error:
DEBUG util.py:443: Problem: problem with installed package
fedora-release-38-0.23.noarch
DEBUG util.py:443:- package
iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.1.4-8.git2a8f9d8.fc38.x86_64 requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167413
Bug ID: 2167413
Summary: Upgrade perl-Test-CheckManifest to 1.43
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Test-CheckManifest
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158089
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158089
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mspa...@redhat.com |jples...@redhat.com
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023, 12:44 Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I have just learned the hard way that `fedpkg import` does not work with
> `rpmautospec` and that is show stopper for me. I have reported ticket here:
>
> https://pagure.io/rpkg/issue/655
I ran into this myself and found its a bit less of an
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:13:11PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:14 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:36:52AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > ocaml-dose3 orphan 2 weeks
> > > ago
> > > ocaml-mccs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163020
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163020
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230205.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230206.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 119
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 59.91 KiB
Size of dropped packages
I have just learned the hard way that `fedpkg import` does not work with
`rpmautospec` and that is show stopper for me. I have reported ticket here:
https://pagure.io/rpkg/issue/655
And won't try rpmautospec again until this is resolved.
Vít
Dne 30. 12. 22 v 20:01 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
Dne 06. 02. 23 v 1:13 Georg Sauthoff napsal(a):
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 02:45:23PM -0300, Mathias Zavala wrote:
I’m sorry for not answering sooner! I’ll be glad to receive help with the
current state of the package. Thanks in advance
you are a datamash Fedora package maintainer?
25 matches
Mail list logo
