On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 02:31:39PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I am reading this correctly, the only package affected would be
> > > > drgn (from python-drgn).
> > > > It should hopefully just need a rebuild.
> > > > Is that correct?
> > > > Were you planning on rebuilding
Hi, I would really like these two packages added to F38:
NEW ghc-constraints: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162872
NEW ghc-base64: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163472
both are needed by newer pandoc and a number of other packages.
Can anyone please help review
On 2/2/23 10:16, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
I have spend some quality time bringing rubygem-railties test suite
up2date and this resulted in dropping the dependency on
rubygem-jquery-rails. Nothing else in Fedora depends on that package and
therefore I orphaned it and I suggest to let it go.
I hope everyone here follows the Fedora Community blog one way or another,
but I know there are lot of things to follow, so posting this here too.
From https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/help-shape-the-fedora-strategy/
The Fedora.Next strategy was a key part of the success we’ve enjoyed
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 09:51:37AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yep. Sigs exist because they say they do. ;)
>
> The risc-v sig has been around for a while, but I guess a sig wiki page
> was never made. :(
I like that we have low barriers to entry for SIGs, but we end up with a lot
of empty
EPEL 8 Modules are now officially retired.
- The EPEL 8 modules are being archived.
- The mirror manager is being pointed to the archive
- Tags, targets and configurations are being removed so new builds cannot
happen.
- The dnf epel-modular.repo will remain, but will still default to disabled
-
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, Ben Cotton wrote:
For the curious, here are the stats from today's run:
### Found 2129 users in the packager group. ###
### Found 914 users with no activity in pagure/src.fp.org over the
last year. ###
### Found 845 users which also show no activity in Bodhi over the last
On 15. 02. 23 22:48, Kenneth Goldman wrote:
However, the %Description item has some 'smart quotes', which
cut and paste as utf-something. fedpkg doesn't like those
characters.
What does "fedpkg doesn't like those characters" actually mean? I don't believe
fedpkg validates the %description
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-02-15/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-02-15-16.29.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-02-15/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-02-15-16.29.txt
Log:
If a maintainer of the packaging tutorial at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_GNU_Hello/
is listening ... There is a sample spec file. An obvious step for a newbie
after
running rpmdev-newspec is to cut and paste from the web page sample to
.spec
In case you missed it on the Community Blog[1], the F37 retrospective
survey[2] is open through 9 March. As a reminder, this survey is about
the _process_ of creating F37, not the end result. This is the third
such survey, so we'll be able to start putting together trends.
This survey uses
In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release,
packagers who remain inactive will be removed from the packager group.
(Note that pagure.io is one of the
In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release,
packagers who remain inactive will be removed from the packager group.
(Note that pagure.io is one of the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
Considering this, I intent to retire pypy3.8 from Fedora 38+ before the beta
freeze.
Forwarded Message
Subject: [pypy-dev] Dropping py3.8, working on py3.10
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 12:01:58 +0200
From: Matti Picus
To: pypy-...@python.org
We have begun work on py3.10. I
> Should that tutorial work? Is it perhaps obsolete?
I'd say the opposite of obsolete - it's been updated to suggest using
fedpkg all along the way, instead of the old rpmbuild tools. But it
looks like it wasn't tested enough to make sure everything works.
> My newbie understanding is that
> -Original Message-
> From: Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 6:03 PM
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url
> or
> pushurl
>
> > Is there another argument to fedpkg?
> fedpkg has a --name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169177
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
Hi,
I have orphaned python3-pyPEG2. It used to be required by qutebrowser
(keyboard-focused browser with a minimal GUI), but it is not needed
anymore. I haven't found any other package that needs it.
Tomáš
___
devel mailing list --
OLD: Fedora-38-20230214.n.1
NEW: Fedora-38-20230215.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:7
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 85
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.16 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-CUPS` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Migrate to libcupsfilters 2.0
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-CUPS/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
zdohnal opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-CUPS` that you
are following:
``
Migrate to libcupsfilters 2.0
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-CUPS/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
Dne 14. 02. 23 v 20:19 Kenneth Goldman napsal(a):
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_
GNU_Hello/
I wish this was update to suggest to create git repository right from start.
BTW I think that fedpkg could help with this task and therefore opened
this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169177
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github dk/Prima/issues/81
--
You are
Hi,
Kenneth Goldman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Clemens Lang
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 12:59 PM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
You are right, but fkinit will tell you, so I don’t think we need to
clarify this in
the documentation:
:) cllang@frootmig:~$
V Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:37:30PM +, Kenneth Goldman napsal(a):
> How do I get packager status? How do I work with a packager - is that a
> person or a program?
>
> A quick google gave me this link:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169950
Bug ID: 2169950
Summary: perl-Date-Holidays-DE-2.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Date-Holidays-DE
Keywords: FutureFeature,
28 matches
Mail list logo
