[rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp] PR #16: 0.088 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PPIx-Regexp` that you are following: `` 0.088 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/pull-request/16 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 2173931] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.088 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173931 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

Gordon Messmer kirjoitti 23.2.2023 klo 7.34: In case it helps: I started with the filelist in the "fedora" repo, and a list of all of the deps printed by dnf repoquery that ended with '()(64bit)', which should be a list of all of the ELF dependencies that don't have versioned symbols.  I

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 4:56 PM Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: > (I admit I'm surprised that "Free Software for Everything" Red Hat is > chosing to base something so fundamental to their business on a highly > proprietary tool. I suppose O365 is just a matter of time...) They probably also

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-934b856e97 python-django3-3.2.18-1.el8 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c623c9e23d stb-0-0.24.20230129git5736b15.el8 The

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-aafd7b2092 stb-0^20230129git5736b15-0.2.el9 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-06f86f0ae3 radare2-5.8.2-2.el9 The following builds

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-acd256a168 gssntlmssp-1.2.0-1.el7 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-29b054d297 chromium-110.0.5481.177-1.el7 3

Re: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition

Hi, Miroslav Suchý writes: > The list of packages needed to be converted is again here: > > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt > > List by package maintainers is here > > >

[Bug 2173731] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-59640841ed has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2173731] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-becfb2917e has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2173731] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 2174261] New: perl-Prima-1.68001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174261 Bug ID: 2174261 Summary: perl-Prima-1.68001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Prima Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] Re: Upcoming removal of rust2rpm + major Rust packaging toolchain update for EPEL 9

On Tue Feb 28, 2023 at 23:44 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 5:56 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > > > I think the intention was to push this to epel9-next first, but then I > > accidentally opened the last two PRs against epel9 instead of > > epel9-next. FTR, python3.11 won't be

Re: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition

On 28. 02. 23 21:40, Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:37 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On one hand, I think the script should consider commits like this: """ Modernize packaging Remove deprecated macros Verify license is SPDX Drop Fedora 28 conditionals """ On the other hand, I

Re: Self Introduction:

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:19 PM Kanagaraj, Raghavan wrote: > > Hi All, > > I work as a Senior Kernel Engineer in Intel. I am responsible to create > Intel-cmt-cat package for Intel. I would like to join in Fedora packager > group. So that I can create and release the Intel-cmt-cat package

[EPEL-devel] Re: Upcoming removal of rust2rpm + major Rust packaging toolchain update for EPEL 9

On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 5:56 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > I think the intention was to push this to epel9-next first, but then I > accidentally opened the last two PRs against epel9 instead of > epel9-next. FTR, python3.11 won't be available until ~May when 9.2 comes > out, so we can't yet built this

Re: Self Introduction: Dalton Hubble

Welcome Dalton. I really admire the work on Typhoon. I still just roll my own clusters in my home lab via ansible on top of fedora (minimal) but am thinking about also using Fedora CoreOS. Typhoon would be useful. If you have any ideas or thoughts on the plain Kubernetes rpms in Fedora please

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

On Fri, 2023-02-24 at 11:55 -0500, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 05:55:55AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Ah right, I had forgotten about that issue. I do not think I will ever > > understand the fascination some projects have for JIRA. It is proprietary, >

Self Introduction:

Hi All, I work as a Senior Kernel Engineer in Intel. I am responsible to create Intel-cmt-cat package for Intel. I would like to join in Fedora packager group. So that I can create and release the Intel-cmt-cat package after every release. I am the maintainer of Intel-cmt-cat project.

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

On 2/24/23 11:55, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: (I admit I'm surprised that "Free Software for Everything" Red Hat is chosing to base something so fundamental to their business on a highly proprietary tool. I suppose O365 is just a matter of time...) Not O365, but Google Workspace... that

Re: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:37 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On one hand, I think the script should consider commits like this: > > """ > Modernize packaging > > Remove deprecated macros > Verify license is SPDX > Drop Fedora 28 conditionals > """ > > On the other hand, I consider putting "Verified

Re: F39 proposal: Modernize Thread Building Blocks for Fedora 39 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 7:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:46:24PM +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB > > > > > >

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-02-28)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2023-02-28) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:34 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-02-28/fesco.2023-02-28-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition

On 28. 02. 23 0:40, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 28. 02. 23 v 0:26 Jerry James napsal(a): So I guess the script only checks the first line of the git commit message, right? Right. I thought that checking whole commit message may bring more false positives. On one hand, I think the script

Re: Strange RPM build warning

On 2/28/23 12:37 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: February is abbreviated as "Fed" in the first changelog entry: * Tue Fed 28 2023 Steve Dickson 1.2.6-4.rc2 - Updated to latest upstream RC release: rpcbind-1_2_7-rc2 Yup! That was the problem... Thank you for your time!!! steved. On Tue, Feb 28,

Re: Strange RPM build warning

On 2/28/23 12:37 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 28. 02. 23 18:33, Steve Dickson wrote: On 2/28/23 12:12 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 28. 02. 23 17:43, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, I'm getting this warning RPM build warnings: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing

Re: Strange RPM build warning

February is abbreviated as "Fed" in the first changelog entry: * Tue Fed 28 2023 Steve Dickson 1.2.6-4.rc2 - Updated to latest upstream RC release: rpcbind-1_2_7-rc2 On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:33:39PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > On 2/28/23 12:12 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 28. 02. 23

Re: Strange RPM build warning

On 28. 02. 23 18:33, Steve Dickson wrote: On 2/28/23 12:12 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 28. 02. 23 17:43, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, I'm getting this warning RPM build warnings: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing But the %changelog is not missing... Any

Re: Strange RPM build warning

On 2/28/23 12:12 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 28. 02. 23 17:43, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, I'm getting this warning RPM build warnings: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing But the %changelog is not missing... Any ideas? Could you please share the spec

Re: Strange RPM build warning

On 28. 02. 23 17:43, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, I'm getting this warning RPM build warnings:     source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing But the %changelog is not missing... Any ideas? Could you please share the spec file? I've seen this when the %changelog was

[Bug 2174023] New: perl-Rose-DB-0.785 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174023 Bug ID: 2174023 Summary: perl-Rose-DB-0.785 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Rose-DB Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2174023] perl-Rose-DB-0.785 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174023 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: GenericError: File upload failed: cli-build/1677604077.5321324.KMmedwnx/perl-Rose-DB-0.785-1.fc36.src.rpm Traceback: File

Strange RPM build warning

Hello, I'm getting this warning RPM build warnings: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing But the %changelog is not missing... Any ideas? tia, steved. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[Bug 1731700] rt depends on files/directories from non-standard locations

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700 --- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Let's discuss behaviour of dnf5 in the dnf5 bug… In the context of this package, what Petr wrote. Let's say that 'rt' had a dependency on 'foo' (Requires:foo), and it turns out that 'foo'

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 28/02/2023 12:28, Tom Hughes wrote: Nothing to do with me. I don't do ELN. Got it. I'm working with upstream on porting spdlog to catch v3: https://github.com/gabime/spdlog/pull/2656 The tests passed on GitHub CI, but not on Fedora Koji. Maybe FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 or GLIB assertions strikes

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-03-01 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #topic aloha

Re: F39 proposal: Modernize Thread Building Blocks for Fedora 39 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:46:24PM +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB > > > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > > process, proposals are publicly

[Bug 2172836] perl-Authen-Krb5: uses internal krb5 functions, so build in C89 mode

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172836 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE

Re: c++ packaging of contour terminal and libunicode

Grateful for your suggestion, it helps me, so it can build the RPM package and install it finally. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-02-28)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d

Minor license changes in python-graph-tool 2.46

In python-graph-tool 2.46, the Python package contains a new module (src/graph_tool/collection/small.py) that contains code derived from the NetworkX library under the BSD-3-Clause license, but with modifications under LGPL-3.0-or-later. I have therefore assigned the SPDX expression

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 13:38 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:56 AM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > this issue definitely should go to the common bugs , IMO.  > > > > > See the link that I posted ;) yeah sorry :) common bugs have moved to

[Bug 2173931] New: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.088 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173931 Bug ID: 2173931 Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.088 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: c++ packaging of contour terminal and libunicode

On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:04:27 + Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:21 PM Felix Wang wrote: > > > Thanks for your advice. I tried and it can be built with no error, but > > when installing built contour package, it shows the following error: > > ``` > > Error: > >

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:56 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > this issue definitely should go to the common bugs , IMO. > See the link that I posted ;) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 07:18, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > Am 28.02.23 um 10:34 schrieb Kamil Paral: > > > That's most certainly this problem: > > > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/popular-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-update-remove-due-to-security-policies-verification/31594 > < >

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

Am 28.02.23 um 10:34 schrieb Kamil Paral: That's most certainly this problem: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/popular-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-update-remove-due-to-security-policies-verification/31594

[Bug 2172836] perl-Authen-Krb5: uses internal krb5 functions, so build in C89 mode

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172836 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Authen-Krb5: uses |perl-Authen-Krb5: uses

[Bug 2172836] perl-Authen-Krb5: uses internal krb5 functions in example code, so build in C89 mode

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172836 --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer --- Uh-oh. Upstream basically closed down in January. links to , which is archived. It probably does not make sense

[Bug 2172836] perl-Authen-Krb5: uses internal krb5 functions in example code, so build in C89 mode

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172836 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|2137512 |2137516

[Bug 2173633] perl-DBIx-Safe required package for Bucardo missing in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173633 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org Doc

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230228.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-38-20230227.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230228.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 28/02/2023 11:24, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 24/02/2023 09:42, Tom Hughes wrote: Did you miss the bit where I said you needed to change your BR to catch2-devel unless upstream has v3 support? What about Fedora ELN? catch2-devel is not available there. Nothing to do with me. I

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 24/02/2023 09:42, Tom Hughes wrote: Did you miss the bit where I said you needed to change your BR to catch2-devel unless upstream has v3 support? What about Fedora ELN? catch2-devel is not available there. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: c++ packaging of contour terminal and libunicode

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:21 PM Felix Wang wrote: > Thanks for your advice. I tried and it can be built with no error, but > when installing built contour package, it shows the following error: > ``` > Error: > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides

Re: qemu on i686

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:52:06AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > [Only direct dependencies] > Packages that BuildRequire qemu*: > > [n] appliance-tools > cloud-utils > [n] cockpit-machines > [n] containers-common > copr-rpmbuild > [n] diskimage-builder > guestfs-tools > [n]

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 10:34 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:39 AM Ralf Corsépius > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > [Resending here, because the test list doesn't allow me to post, > > there] > > > > on f38, I am unable to install any locally built package (signed > > with a > >

Re: qemu on i686

[Only direct dependencies] Packages that BuildRequire qemu*: [n] appliance-tools cloud-utils [n] cockpit-machines [n] containers-common copr-rpmbuild [n] diskimage-builder guestfs-tools [n] imagefactory-plugins kata-containers kiwi [n] kiwi-boxed-plugin [ns]koji libguestfs

[Bug 2173731] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-59640841ed has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-59640841ed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2173731] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-222504c956 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-222504c956 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2173731] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-becfb2917e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-becfb2917e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230228.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230227.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230228.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 96 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.80 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

V Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 02:47:03AM -, Daniel Alley napsal(a): > I am not sure whether by "all historical updates" you are only referring to > all updates being listed in updateinfo.xml, or all history generally > (including old packages). The latter. > But in the latter case, note that

[Bug 2173731] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1.

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:39 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote: > Hi, > > [Resending here, because the test list doesn't allow me to post, there] > > on f38, I am unable to install any locally built package (signed with a > local key, I have been using for many years): > > # rpm -U

[Bug 2173731] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Unable to install locally built rpms

Hi, [Resending here, because the test list doesn't allow me to post, there] on f38, I am unable to install any locally built package (signed with a local key, I have been using for many years): # rpm -U xpetri-0.4.8-0.fc38.x86_64.rpm error: xpetri-0.4.8-0.fc38.x86_64.rpm: Header V4

[Bug 2173868] New: Upgrade perl-OLE-Storage_Lite to 0.22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173868 Bug ID: 2173868 Summary: Upgrade perl-OLE-Storage_Lite to 0.22 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/OLE-Storage_Lite Status: NEW

[Bug 2173865] New: Upgrade perl-Crypt-X509 to 0.55

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173865 Bug ID: 2173865 Summary: Upgrade perl-Crypt-X509 to 0.55 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-X509 Status: NEW Component: