Release rpkg-1.66 and fedpkg-1.44

Hi all, a new version rpkg-1.66 together with fedpkg-1.44 are released containing both features and bugfixes. Currently, only Fedora 37 (and Rawhide) packages are present in stable repositories. Other supported packages are waiting in testing repositories and should be available in stable in the

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

Works for me in Virtualbox did the i18n testing with it On 3/8/23, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > testing! For more information on release validation

[EPEL-devel] Re: Timeframe for EPEL retirement vs RHEL new package releases

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 2:18 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 11:38 AM Carl George wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 8:52 AM Troy Dawson wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:48 PM Carl George wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 5:42 AM Daniel P. Berrangé >> >>

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl -> %build

On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 12:15 AM Kenneth Goldman wrote: > > Where are the macros defined? I.e., %configure probably expands > to ./configure and %make_build to make. In addition to Chuck's reply, you can also use the --eval (or -E) flag with rpm to see the values of variables or to what a macro

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing munin-2.0.72-1.el7 resalloc-openstack-9.5-1.el7 Details about builds: munin-2.0.72-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6147e7994c) Network-wide

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl -> %build

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 11:14:34PM +, Kenneth Goldman wrote: > Let's see if I have this right ... > > %build > %configure > %make_build > > are not three separate steps. %build is the overall step, and the next two > lines > are the build steps. The blank line terminates the %build.

[Bug 2173127] perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3 |perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3

[Bug 2172670] perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172670 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3

[Bug 2173461] perl-Test-Directory-0.052 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Directory-0.052-1 |perl-Test-Directory-0.052-1

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085 Bug 2105085 depends on bug 2173127, which changed state. Bug 2173127 Summary: perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2173461] perl-Test-Directory-0.052 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2173127] perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3

[EPEL-devel] Re: Future of ClamAV on EPEL ?

On 3/7/23 13:48, Stephen Smoogen wrote: On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:00, Andrew C Aitchison > wrote: This question is prompted by a question from kumar bava about EPEL7 on the ClamaAV Users list:

[Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the

RE: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl -> %build

> -Original Message- > From: Vít Ondruch > Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 6:58 AM > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or > pushurl > > > How does it know what to build. Does it default to configure;make > > or

RE: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

> -Original Message- > From: Jason Tibbitts > Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 6:51 PM > To: Kenneth Goldman > Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc > > > Kenneth Goldman writes: > > > but … if the

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

Petr Pisar kirjoitti 7.3.2023 klo 16.48: V Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 02:19:11PM -, Betty Liu napsal(a): I'm using CentOS stream 8 and I've downloaded the source code of yellow. In the same directory, I've made the spec file, but after I run fedpkg --release f28 mockbuild I worry that f28 is

[EPEL-devel] Re: Future of ClamAV on EPEL ?

On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:00, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > > This question is prompted by a question from kumar bava about EPEL7 > on the ClamaAV Users list: > https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2023-March/013338.html > > EPEL currently ship the anti-virus ClamAV v0.103.8 > > From

[EPEL-devel] Re: Future of ClamAV on EPEL ?

On Tue Mar 7, 2023 at 15:24 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 3:00 PM Andrew C Aitchison > wrote: > > Rust is available on RHEL 7, 8 and 9 as a part of Red Hat Developer Tools. > > Small clarification: Rust is available directly in RHEL 8 and 9, not > as part of Red Hat Developer

[EPEL-devel] Re: Future of ClamAV on EPEL ?

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 3:00 PM Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > > > This question is prompted by a question from kumar bava about EPEL7 > on the ClamaAV Users list: > https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2023-March/013338.html > > EPEL currently ship the anti-virus ClamAV v0.103.8 > > From

[EPEL-devel] Re: Timeframe for EPEL retirement vs RHEL new package releases

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 11:38 AM Carl George wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 8:52 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:48 PM Carl George wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 5:42 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > There is also the case of the RHEL

[EPEL-devel] Future of ClamAV on EPEL ?

This question is prompted by a question from kumar bava about EPEL7 on the ClamaAV Users list: https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2023-March/013338.html EPEL currently ship the anti-virus ClamAV v0.103.8 From September ClamAV 0.103 will be EOL, and all supported versions will

[EPEL-devel] Re: Timeframe for EPEL retirement vs RHEL new package releases

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 8:52 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:48 PM Carl George wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 5:42 AM Daniel P. Berrangé >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > There is also the case of the RHEL rebuilds whose users consume EPEL >> > packages. Depending how quick they

Re: [HEADS UP] [SONAME BUMP] libcbor will be updated to 0.10.2 in rawhide with a soname bump

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:04 PM Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 4:55 PM Gary Buhrmaster > wrote: > > Let me know if you have any issues > > with the build. > > All done, thanks. Thank you. I have submitted the side-tag update:

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-07)

== Meeting summary Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-03-07/fesco.2023-03-07-17.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-03-07/fesco.2023-03-07-17.00.txt Log:

Re: [HEADS UP] [SONAME BUMP] libcbor will be updated to 0.10.2 in rawhide with a soname bump

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 4:32 PM Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 3:55 PM Gary Buhrmaster > wrote: > > I will rebuild libfido2. For fwupd, I will need the maintainers > > (CC'ed) or a proven packagers assistance. > > No problem at all, thanks for letting me know. Do you need me to

[Test-Announce] DON'T BOTHER: Re: Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.2 Available Now!

On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 10:24 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: >

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-03-08 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #topic aloha

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

Petr Pisar wrote: > [...] Either turn that directory into a git repository (git > init-db . && git add hello.spec && git commit -a) ... Just a minor, tangential nit, `git init` is the preferred and documented command. The `git init-db` command is an ancient name for it. The documentation for

[Bug 2176194] perl-Test-Inter-1.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176194 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Test-Inter-1.10-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98406282 -- You are

Re: DNF5 Test day - March 14th

Hello, Now Kernel 6.2 test day is happening: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2023-03-05_Kernel_6.2_Test_Week I encourage all of you to test the new kernel release and share your results. Priscila. On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 11:51 AM Nicola Sella wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like

[HEADS UP] [SONAME BUMP] libcbor will be updated to 0.10.2 in rawhide with a soname bump

libcbor will be updated to 0.10.2 in rawhide in the next week or so, which includes a soname bump. The list of affected packages in rawhide are: libfido2 fwupd I will rebuild libfido2. For fwupd, I will need the maintainers (CC'ed) or a proven packagers assistance. I have used the Mass

[Bug 2176194] New: perl-Test-Inter-1.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176194 Bug ID: 2176194 Summary: perl-Test-Inter-1.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Inter Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2176194] perl-Test-Inter-1.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176194 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1948705 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1948705=edit Update to 1.10 (#2176194) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.2 Available Now!

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_38_Beta_1.2_Summary Workstation Pre Beta image installs and works :) On 3/7/23, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

Yeah thank you so much! I will switch to Fedora 37 and have a try again www ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

Thank you for your quick response! I will switch to Fedora and have a try! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Timeframe for EPEL retirement vs RHEL new package releases

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:48 PM Carl George wrote: > On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 5:42 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > > > > There is also the case of the RHEL rebuilds whose users consume EPEL > > packages. Depending how quick they are, the rebuild distros might not > > have their 9.2 rebuild

DNF5 Test day - March 14th

Hello everyone, I would like to invite all of you to participate in the DNF5 test day, which will happen in one week, on the 14th of March. We are finalizing the test cases. All the information will be posted on test/test-announce mailing-lists as usual. For now, head over to the wiki[1] and

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

V Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 02:19:11PM -, Betty Liu napsal(a): > I'm using CentOS stream 8 and I've downloaded the source code of yellow. In > the same directory, I've made the spec file, but after I run > fedpkg --release f28 mockbuild I worry that f28 is tool old and unknown to mock nowdays.

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, Betty Liu wrote: Hi, I'm a beginner at fedora packaging and following the guide in the documentation. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ I'm using CentOS stream 8 and I've downloaded the source code of yellow. In the same directory, I've made the

fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

Hi, I'm a beginner at fedora packaging and following the guide in the documentation. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ I'm using CentOS stream 8 and I've downloaded the source code of yellow. In the same directory, I've made the spec file, but after I run fedpkg

biber license correction

biber-2.19 will correct a license from ((GPL+ or Artistic 2.0) and Artistic 2.0) to (Artistic-2.0). -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 2175955] biber-2.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- You are right. I opened an update request for biblatex (bug #2176089). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955

[Bug 2175955] biber-2.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2176089 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2149282] perl-PAR-Packer-1.057 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149282 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230307.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230306.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230307.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 151 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1009.76 KiB Size of dropped packages

[Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.2 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the

Re: Take 1 minute to help with Infra & Releng Team with a decision - closing tomorrow

The survey is now closed. We had 67 responses and 67% of those responses are for favor to keep gain/trouble labels. So we will keep them, it seems that majority of community is happy with them as they are. Thank you for the responses. On behalf of I Team, Michal On 06. 03. 23 10:22, Michal

[rpms/perl-Locale-Codes] PR #22: 3.73 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 3.73 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/22 ___ perl-devel mailing list --