[Test-Announce] Kernel 6.3 Test Week 2023-05-07

2023-05-04 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey All, I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.3 Test week is happening from 2023-05-07 to 2023-05-14. It's fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your results. As usual, the

Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:44:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 05. 23 23:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello folks, > > ...snip... > > > > > > Would that be possible? > > > > I don't think it currently is... but sounds like

Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 04. 05. 23 23:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello folks, ...snip... Would that be possible? I don't think it currently is... but sounds like a reasonable RFE to koji to me. The way koji handles noarch packages is that it builds them

Re: F39 proposal: Fedora Onyx (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2023-05-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 07:28:29AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I assume that this proposal will be accepted; the following is not > about blocking this proposal. But I wanted to ask a wider question: > is there some way to avoid having a separate immutable spin for each > and eve

Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello folks, ...snip... > > Would that be possible? I don't think it currently is... but sounds like a reasonable RFE to koji to me. The way koji handles noarch packages is that it builds them on all arches, checks to make sure they

Re: nodejs broken?

2023-05-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:40 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:27 AM Sandro Mani wrote: > > > AFAICS nodejs is generally broken in rawhide (both nodejs20 and nodejs18), > > i.e. just > > > > $ node > > > > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > > > gdb: > > > > Thread 3 "n

How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

2023-05-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello folks, Couple months ago, we discussed with @psimovec if it's possible to ExcludeArch i686 from scipy. This Python discussion brought the topic back: https://discuss.python.org/t/dropping-32-bit-packages/5476/9 I've tried to see how many packages would be affected and the short answer i

Re: The new version of Fedora Messaging Notifications will arrive this week

2023-05-04 Thread Björn Persson
Aurelien Bompard wrote: > do you mind opening a ticket on FMN's tracker please? Done: https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn/issues/901 Björn Persson pgpwJ54yOnOQ8.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Place to write something up

2023-05-04 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 04.05.2023 um 14:11 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones : > > On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 10:01:51PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >> Kind of a random thing, but... I would like to write up how to use GRUB2 >> to do BIOS-PXE+UEFI-PXE+UEFI-HTTP boot. I asked for the Fedora packages >> to include the needed

Re: Place to write something up

2023-05-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 10:01:51PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Kind of a random thing, but... I would like to write up how to use GRUB2 > to do BIOS-PXE+UEFI-PXE+UEFI-HTTP boot. I asked for the Fedora packages > to include the needed PXE bit, and it does now (thanks!), so I feel I > owe a good exp

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2023-05-04 Thread sgallagh
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2023-05-05 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10449/ ___ devel maili

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230504.n.0 changes

2023-05-04 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230503.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230504.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 95 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 194.28 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: [HEADS UP] update of kiss-fft library with added shared versions

2023-05-04 Thread Petr Pisar
V Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:05:21AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a): > > "dnf repoquery --srpm --whatrequires kiss-fft-static" returns nothing, > That's because there's no "kiss-fft-static" package, only "kiss-fft-devel". > kiss-fft-static is provided by kiss-fft-devel. > Running "dnf repoqu

Re: [HEADS UP] update of kiss-fft library with added shared versions

2023-05-04 Thread Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> "dnf repoquery --srpm --whatrequires kiss-fft-static" returns nothing, That's because there's no "kiss-fft-static" package, only "kiss-fft-devel". Running "dnf repoquery --releasever=39 --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo='*-source' --whatrequires kiss-fft-devel" gives me: - ckb-next-0:0.5.0-4.fc39.

Re: [HEADS UP] update of kiss-fft library with added shared versions

2023-05-04 Thread Petr Pisar
V Thu, May 04, 2023 at 12:30:15PM +0200, Guido Aulisi napsal(a): > I could not find which packages requires this static library for > building, it's only a BR dependency. > "dnf repoquery --srpm --whatrequires kiss-fft-static" returns nothing, so there is no package which build-require kiss-fft in

[HEADS UP] update of kiss-fft library with added shared versions

2023-05-04 Thread Guido Aulisi
Hi, kiss-fft library was a static only library, but recently added the possibility to build shared versions too. The current version is 131.1.0 The shared versions are multiple, because they are compiled with different number types. We are upgrading this library adding the shared vwersions, but ma

Re: Place to write something up

2023-05-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2023-05-03 at 22:01 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Kind of a random thing, but... I would like to write up how to use > GRUB2 > to do BIOS-PXE+UEFI-PXE+UEFI-HTTP boot.  I asked for the Fedora > packages > to include the needed PXE bit, and it does now (thanks!), so I feel I > owe a good explan

[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230504.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2023-05-04 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230504.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: F39 proposal: Fedora Onyx (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2023-05-04 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 3:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 03:31:00PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Onyx > > == Detailed Description == > > Fedora Onyx is an immutable desktop operating system, featuring the > > Budgie

Re: F39 proposal: Fedora Onyx (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2023-05-04 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 03:31:00PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Onyx > == Detailed Description == > Fedora Onyx is an immutable desktop operating system, featuring the > Budgie Desktop environment. Fedora Onyx leverages the same > foundational technologie

Re: The new version of Fedora Messaging Notifications will arrive this week

2023-05-04 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:30:01AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 08:56:57AM -, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > > So… I understand why this default was chosen, but I think that it'd be > > > better > > > to change the default to something narrow-but-reasonable, especially for