Hi all,
Just a reminder that the Fedora Legal -SPDX Hackfest is next week,
Wednesday, May 17th.
See details below!
Thanks,
Jilayne
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Fedora-legal-list] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Legal
- SPDX Hackfest
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 10:00:03
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 12:52 -0500, Gregory Bartholomew wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:10 AM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
> >
> > (Moreover, read-only access doesn't cut it. If you want boot counting
> > you want write access.)
> >
> >
> Just interjecting a quick thought -- would it be po
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 20:30 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 24. 04. 23 v 11:47 Aurelien Bompard napsal(a):
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > The FMN replacement team has finished writing the new version of
> > our
> > notification system, and we are ready to deploy! We plan on
> > deploying
> > the new ver
Neal Gompa wrote:
> I deeply dislike the way Discourse works as a forum, but what else is
> there now? I guess Vanilla, but that's a solution where there's a
> mismatch in the "cloud" version and the self-hosted open source
> version (at first glance, they might be completely different codebases
>
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:31 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Aoife Moloney writes:
>
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlatpaksWithoutModules
> >
> snip
> >
> > There is considerable implementation complexity within OSBS to implement
> this,
> > because the N/V/R need to be written into
> I'm just wondering whether the name suffix is the right place to put
"flatpak" as if it were a subpackage - can we use the dist tag instead, say
`fi39` for "fedora immutable based on fedora 39" or something like that? Or
`fp39` for `fedora flatpak ...`?
The main difference is what happens when y
I like the idea. I will definitely go for it, in a show of hands or vote.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:16 p.m., Adam
Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 13:49
-0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Images_On_Azure
>
> Thi
Dne 24. 04. 23 v 11:47 Aurelien Bompard napsal(a):
Hi folks!
The FMN replacement team has finished writing the new version of our
notification system, and we are ready to deploy! We plan on deploying
the new version on https://notifications.fedoraproject.org this week,
we'll keep the old one ar
Hi,
Aoife Moloney writes:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlatpaksWithoutModules
>
snip
>
> There is considerable implementation complexity within OSBS to implement this,
> because the N/V/R need to be written into generated Dockerfile as
> labels ''before'' building it,
> but it should
On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 13:49 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Images_On_Azure
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:10 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> (Moreover, read-only access doesn't cut it. If you want boot counting
> you want write access.)
>
>
Just interjecting a quick thought -- would it be possible to use FAT's
reserved sectors for the boot counting? (You can find a descrip
Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not even a
request for additional information.
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 10:50:42 AM CDT, Sandro wrote:
On 07-05-2023 17:34, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> How long does it take to unretire a package? I was thinking th
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:10 PM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Mi, 10.05.23 17:54, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >
> > Read-only drivers, which are the only drivers under discussion here,
> > aren't a per se problem because they can't modify the file
> > system. So they have no
On Do, 11.05.23 03:59, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:54:45PM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > I don't know what question you asked them. Any modifications
> > > (writes) performed ou
On Mi, 10.05.23 17:54, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023, at 5:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > So to add to this. I happen to be at LFSMMBPF at the moment, the Linux
> > File System summit (among other things) where all the Linux FS people
> > meet. I sp
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 18:46 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 10.05.23 11:20, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > It sounds reasonable for sure.
> > The only concern is, given Microsoft creates at most 500MB ESP
> > partitions, are we sure all UEFI systems out there will not choke on
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 12:00 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:12 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 12:37 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 12:31 PM Lennart Poettering
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Di, 09.05.23 08:22, Neal Gompa (ngomp.
Makes a lot of sense and improves the information value of the version greatly.
I'm just wondering whether the name suffix is the right place to put "flatpak"
as if it were a subpackage - can we use the dist tag instead, say `fi39` for
"fedora immutable based on fedora 39" or something like that
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230510.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230511.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 172
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 525.98 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 6:26 AM Luca Boccassi
> I definitely am, considering how often there's no space and how easy
> it is to brick many systems through it.
Right, and that's the only other way to convey this information to the
bootloader. And that's one of the reasons why in sd-boot we use
* Björn Persson:
> It would still be better to use parameters only where they are
> meaningful. Longer command lines make troubleshooting more difficult.
We used to have %{optflags} only, set via the rpmrc dispatch in
redhat-rpm-config, and migrating off that to a more flexible solution is
under
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 07:09:49PM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
> I suppose I would belong to the latter. From a Server admin’s POV the modules
> are a great chance to keep some backwards compatibility with our fast pacing
> distro. The most prominent example is PostgreSQL. It is not so rare that the
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 06:08:29AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It was probably a mistake to say "Fedora 40 and onward" will use
> Discourse for Change discussions, as it assumes success (which I don't
> want to assume after many experiences in the past proving otherwise).
> I would have preferred th
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 03:59:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:54:45PM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > I don't know what question you asked them. Any modifications
> > > (writes) performed outsi
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 6:26 AM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > >
> > We already don't do boot counting from the bootloader side. That
> > happens in the operating system.
>
> boot counting in the bootloader is a good thing to have, as th
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 02:25:07PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 11:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > Especially not by making some small change contingent on moonshot proposals.
> > But I think that a) the current proposal is just a band-aid, and
> > b) to make
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>
> We already don't do boot counting from the bootloader side. That
> happens in the operating system.
boot counting in the bootloader is a good thing to have, as that's the only
place to catch a few significant failures, and also i
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:23 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 11.05.23 um 09:09 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:22:09AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> >> Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> >>> So you folks were not happy with the feedback on the mailing
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:26 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:54:50AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:21 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 18:32 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > > On Di, 09.05.23 09:20, Zbignie
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:54:45PM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > I don't know what question you asked them. Any modifications
> > (writes) performed outside kernel code is not supported, since
> > forever.
>
> > Read-only driv
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:54:45PM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I don't know what question you asked them. Any modifications
> (writes) performed outside kernel code is not supported, since
> forever.
> Read-only drivers, which are the only drivers under discussion here,
> aren't a per se problem
V Wed, May 10, 2023 at 09:45:35AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> Should we consider just retiring modular repos entirely?
>
> I do know there's a number of active module builds, but I am not sure
> how much users use them. While RHEL still uses modules, EPEL has retired
> their epel8 modular repo
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 7:27 AM DJ Delorie wrote:
> Jens-Ulrik Petersen writes:
> > I have just now pushed fixes for all ghc*, so can you try to rebuild
> > them again in your repo?
>
> That's a good question, to which I know not the answer. Fred? Can MPB
> be told to retest a specific set of
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:54:50AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:21 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 18:32 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Di, 09.05.23 09:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > == Summar
Am 11.05.23 um 09:09 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:22:09AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
So you folks were not happy with the feedback on the mailing list, so you
just made up a poll somewhere else.
[snip]
Was that poll
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:22:09AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > So you folks were not happy with the feedback on the mailing list, so you
> > just made up a poll somewhere else.
> [snip]
> > Was that poll ever announced on the mailing list? Or did you jus
36 matches
Mail list logo
