https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192642
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192869
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PerlIO-eol-0.18-1.fc39 |perl-PerlIO-eol-0.18-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192860
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In
Tens of thousands of upstream projects are packaged into Fedora and
EPEL. If they can find ways to deliver security fixes while following
Fedora and EPEL update policies, then apptainer can too. Asking you
to follow these policies is not a punishment. If you're unwilling to
follow these
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-81da0a3daf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-07e0eca857 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192869
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PerlIO-eol-0.18-1.fc39 |perl-PerlIO-eol-0.18-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-756430111b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203047
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-d05e65eea1 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-7bc811fcc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192869
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PerlIO-eol-0.18-1.fc39 |perl-PerlIO-eol-0.18-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203047
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
Hi all,
Just a reminder that the Fedora Legal -SPDX Hackfest is next week,
Wednesday, May 17th.
See details below!
Thanks,
Jilayne
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Fedora-legal-list] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Legal
- SPDX Hackfest
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 10:00:03
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 12:52 -0500, Gregory Bartholomew wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:10 AM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
> >
> > (Moreover, read-only access doesn't cut it. If you want boot counting
> > you want write access.)
> >
> >
> Just interjecting a quick thought -- would it be
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 20:30 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 24. 04. 23 v 11:47 Aurelien Bompard napsal(a):
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > The FMN replacement team has finished writing the new version of
> > our
> > notification system, and we are ready to deploy! We plan on
> > deploying
> > the new
Neal Gompa wrote:
> I deeply dislike the way Discourse works as a forum, but what else is
> there now? I guess Vanilla, but that's a solution where there's a
> mismatch in the "cloud" version and the self-hosted open source
> version (at first glance, they might be completely different codebases
>
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:31 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Aoife Moloney writes:
>
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlatpaksWithoutModules
> >
> snip
> >
> > There is considerable implementation complexity within OSBS to implement
> this,
> > because the N/V/R need to be written into
> I'm just wondering whether the name suffix is the right place to put
"flatpak" as if it were a subpackage - can we use the dist tag instead, say
`fi39` for "fedora immutable based on fedora 39" or something like that? Or
`fp39` for `fedora flatpak ...`?
The main difference is what happens when
I like the idea. I will definitely go for it, in a show of hands or vote.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:16 p.m., Adam
Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 13:49
-0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Images_On_Azure
>
>
Dne 24. 04. 23 v 11:47 Aurelien Bompard napsal(a):
Hi folks!
The FMN replacement team has finished writing the new version of our
notification system, and we are ready to deploy! We plan on deploying
the new version on https://notifications.fedoraproject.org this week,
we'll keep the old one
Hi,
Aoife Moloney writes:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlatpaksWithoutModules
>
snip
>
> There is considerable implementation complexity within OSBS to implement this,
> because the N/V/R need to be written into generated Dockerfile as
> labels ''before'' building it,
> but it
On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 13:49 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Images_On_Azure
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:10 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> (Moreover, read-only access doesn't cut it. If you want boot counting
> you want write access.)
>
>
Just interjecting a quick thought -- would it be possible to use FAT's
reserved sectors for the boot counting? (You can find a
To Troy and the reset of the EPEL Steering Committee:
Thank you very much for granting the request.
The apptainer maintainers promise to do our best to avoid incompatible
updates in the future. However if we discover another high severity
vulnerability in the setuid-root portion that cannot be
Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not even a
request for additional information.
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 10:50:42 AM CDT, Sandro wrote:
On 07-05-2023 17:34, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> How long does it take to unretire a package? I was thinking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-756430111b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-756430111b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:10 PM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Mi, 10.05.23 17:54, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >
> > Read-only drivers, which are the only drivers under discussion here,
> > aren't a per se problem because they can't modify the file
> > system. So they have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-81da0a3daf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-81da0a3daf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-07e0eca857 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-07e0eca857
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-529af2dbc2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-529af2dbc2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-7bc811fcc9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7bc811fcc9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Do, 11.05.23 03:59, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:54:45PM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > I don't know what question you asked them. Any modifications
> > > (writes) performed
On Mi, 10.05.23 17:54, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023, at 5:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > So to add to this. I happen to be at LFSMMBPF at the moment, the Linux
> > File System summit (among other things) where all the Linux FS people
> > meet. I
spot merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PPI-Tester` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update Makefile.PL to not use Module::Install::DSL
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPI-Tester/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-URandom-0.38-1.f
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 18:46 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 10.05.23 11:20, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > It sounds reasonable for sure.
> > The only concern is, given Microsoft creates at most 500MB ESP
> > partitions, are we sure all UEFI systems out there will not choke
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 12:00 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:12 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 12:37 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 12:31 PM Lennart Poettering
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Di, 09.05.23 08:22, Neal Gompa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203044
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PAR-Dist-0.52-1.fc39
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PAR-Dist` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.52 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PAR-Dist/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Makes a lot of sense and improves the information value of the version greatly.
I'm just wondering whether the name suffix is the right place to put "flatpak"
as if it were a subpackage - can we use the dist tag instead, say `fi39` for
"fedora immutable based on fedora 39" or something like
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230510.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230511.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 172
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 525.98 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PAR-Dist` that
you are following:
``
0.52 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PAR-Dist/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 6:26 AM Luca Boccassi
> I definitely am, considering how often there's no space and how easy
> it is to brick many systems through it.
Right, and that's the only other way to convey this information to the
bootloader. And that's one of the reasons why in sd-boot we
* Björn Persson:
> It would still be better to use parameters only where they are
> meaningful. Longer command lines make troubleshooting more difficult.
We used to have %{optflags} only, set via the rpmrc dispatch in
redhat-rpm-config, and migrating off that to a more flexible solution is
under
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 07:09:49PM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
> I suppose I would belong to the latter. From a Server admin’s POV the modules
> are a great chance to keep some backwards compatibility with our fast pacing
> distro. The most prominent example is PostgreSQL. It is not so rare that the
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 06:08:29AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It was probably a mistake to say "Fedora 40 and onward" will use
> Discourse for Change discussions, as it assumes success (which I don't
> want to assume after many experiences in the past proving otherwise).
> I would have preferred
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 03:59:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:54:45PM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > I don't know what question you asked them. Any modifications
> > > (writes) performed
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 6:26 AM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > >
> > We already don't do boot counting from the bootloader side. That
> > happens in the operating system.
>
> boot counting in the bootloader is a good thing to have, as
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 02:25:07PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 11:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > Especially not by making some small change contingent on moonshot proposals.
> > But I think that a) the current proposal is just a band-aid, and
> > b) to make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203046
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>
> We already don't do boot counting from the bootloader side. That
> happens in the operating system.
boot counting in the bootloader is a good thing to have, as that's the only
place to catch a few significant failures, and also
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:23 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 11.05.23 um 09:09 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:22:09AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> >> Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> >>> So you folks were not happy with the feedback on the mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203047
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-d05e65eea1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d05e65eea1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203047
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-0caee20560 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0caee20560
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203073
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2168842
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203047
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193162
Bug 2193162 depends on bug 2192622, which changed state.
Bug 2192622 Summary: Upgrade perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI to 1.07
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192622
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193162
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI-1.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192622
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|jples...@redhat.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192622
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI-1.0
Notification time stamped 2023-05-11 08:32:08 UTC
From aec81f24f21f8a60ed5e092d26ad0133827f5ad0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: May 11 2023 08:30:21 +
Subject: SPDX migration; use author-independent source URL
---
diff --git a/perl-Ref-Util-XS.rpmlintrc
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:26 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:54:50AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:21 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 18:32 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > > On Di, 09.05.23 09:20,
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:54:45PM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > I don't know what question you asked them. Any modifications
> > (writes) performed outside kernel code is not supported, since
> > forever.
>
> > Read-only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182352
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-CallParser-0.002
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182352
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182352
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203073
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
I created a pull request with a possible fix:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPI-Tester/pull-request/1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203073
Bug ID: 2203073
Summary: perl-PPI-Tester: FTBFS: No package found for:
perl(inc::Module::Install::DSL) >= 0.86
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PPI-Tester` that
you are following:
``
Update Makefile.PL to not use Module::Install::DSL
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPI-Tester/pull-request/1
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:54:45PM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I don't know what question you asked them. Any modifications
> (writes) performed outside kernel code is not supported, since
> forever.
> Read-only drivers, which are the only drivers under discussion here,
> aren't a per se problem
V Wed, May 10, 2023 at 09:45:35AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> Should we consider just retiring modular repos entirely?
>
> I do know there's a number of active module builds, but I am not sure
> how much users use them. While RHEL still uses modules, EPEL has retired
> their epel8 modular
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 7:27 AM DJ Delorie wrote:
> Jens-Ulrik Petersen writes:
> > I have just now pushed fixes for all ghc*, so can you try to rebuild
> > them again in your repo?
>
> That's a good question, to which I know not the answer. Fred? Can MPB
> be told to retest a specific set of
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:54:50AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:21 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 18:32 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Di, 09.05.23 09:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > ==
Am 11.05.23 um 09:09 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:22:09AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
So you folks were not happy with the feedback on the mailing list, so you
just made up a poll somewhere else.
[snip]
Was that poll
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:22:09AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > So you folks were not happy with the feedback on the mailing list, so you
> > just made up a poll somewhere else.
> [snip]
> > Was that poll ever announced on the mailing list? Or did you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192639
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182352
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
This broken build prevents from rebuilding perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182352
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203047
Bug ID: 2203047
Summary: Upgrade perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap to 2023.0511
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Text-Tabs+Wrap
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203046
Bug ID: 2203046
Summary: Upgrade perl-Test-Dependencies to 0.32
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Test-Dependencies
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203045
Bug ID: 2203045
Summary: Upgrade perl-Proc-ProcessTable to 0.635
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Proc-ProcessTable
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203044
Bug ID: 2203044
Summary: Upgrade perl-PAR-Dist to 0.52
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/PAR-Dist
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177932
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203040
Bug ID: 2203040
Summary: Upgrade perl-Mojolicious to 9.32
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Mojolicious
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203038
Bug ID: 2203038
Summary: Upgrade perl-libwww-perl to 6.70
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/libwww-perl
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203034
Bug ID: 2203034
Summary: Upgrade perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ModuleBuildTiny to
0.017
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
Bug ID: 2203031
Summary: Upgrade perl-Crypt-URandom to 0.38
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-URandom
Status: NEW
Component:
87 matches
Mail list logo
