Also while we are bike-shedding... What about \W vs \w ?
I think fedora has used \W "forever" - I am not a huge fan...
though I suppose its main merit is not over-flowing/extending for very long
dir paths.
Jens
___
devel mailing list --
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> I actually would prefer that we color both, and make it obvious that
> "root" is special. We should account for common color-blindness
> issues, though.
Sure, I think I agree: perhaps purple for root?
I am all for "color blind testing"
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:24 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen
wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 1:49 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:50 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen
>> wrote:
>> > For example I could suggest we change the default fedora bash prompt from:
>> > PS1="[\u@\h
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 1:49 PM Dridi Boukelmoune <
dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:50 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen
> wrote:
> > For example I could suggest we change the default fedora bash prompt
> from:
> > PS1="[\u@\h \W]\\$ "
> > to something like:
> >
I've built an updated 3006.1 in rawhide with some comments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189782#c4
Gwyn,
Let me know if you've started on backporting the immediate fix for the
3005.1 package branches affected yet or not. I could look at that next.
Cheers,
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at
On 5/22/23 19:17, Christopher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anybody able to help fix salt-minion in F38? It's been broken
> because of a newer version of python setuptools in F38. There's a
> patch upstream, and the newer version also includes that patch. It
> just needs to be incorporated into Fedora.
>
I'll take a peek.
\--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
\
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
\-d. bowie
Sent from Proton Mail mobile
\ Original Message
On May 22, 2023, 6:17 PM, Christopher <
Hi,
Is anybody able to help fix salt-minion in F38? It's been broken
because of a newer version of python setuptools in F38. There's a
patch upstream, and the newer version also includes that patch. It
just needs to be incorporated into Fedora.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189782
Hi all,
Given we just had the hackfest last week, we are cancelling the standing
SPDX Office Hours for tomorrow, May 23rd.
The next SPDX Office Hours will be June 27th at 8am US eastern time at
https://meet.google.com/jbz-erzk-btc?authuser=0=122
Thanks!
> On 22 May 2023, at 04:50, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
>
>
> In Fedora the bash prompt is not colored or highlighted by default.
>
> I personally find this a usability issue: it makes it hard to find previous
> commands between long outputs when scrolling back in a terminal. Of course
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
--- Comment #11 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
(In reply to Andreas Vögele from comment #9)
> (In reply to Michal Josef Spacek from comment #4)
> > I think that you can remove BuildRequires for coreutils, gcc, and perl-devel
> > The library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 2:44 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> > We could put the following at the end of /etc/bashrc:
>
> Something like that would seem more appropriate in an /etc/profile.d
> drop-in - very little special-sauce should go in /etc/bashrc.
Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> We could put the following at the end of /etc/bashrc:
Something like that would seem more appropriate in an /etc/profile.d
drop-in - very little special-sauce should go in /etc/bashrc.
My personal (bike-shedding) preference is to not run external
On 5/22/23 10:59 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, John Reiser said:
>> Warning: This is intrusive because reading the status code via "$?" resets
>> it to zero:
>>$ false
>>$ echo $?
>>1
>>$ echo $?
>>0
>
> That is incorrect. The second reading of $? is the exit
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 2:27 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 11:50 PM Jens-Ulrik Petersen
> wrote:
> >
> > In Fedora the bash prompt is not colored or highlighted by default.
> ...
> > I think it would be nice to have a distinctive prompt by default, or at
> > least a
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 11:50 PM Jens-Ulrik Petersen
wrote:
>
> In Fedora the bash prompt is not colored or highlighted by default.
...
> I think it would be nice to have a distinctive prompt by default, or at least
> a very easy way to get one permanently (ie in a single command: even if that
Hello everybody,
I have orphaned the gnome-valgrind-session [1, 2] package. It's
last release was in 2006, and it doesn't know about Wayland sessions.
I haven't used it for more than a decade, and don't have any time or
motivation to give it the attention that it needs.
Feel free to pick it up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Vögele ---
(In reply to Michal Josef Spacek from comment #4)
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I think that you can remove BuildRequires for coreutils, gcc, and perl-devel
> The library delivers libmaxminddb, detect it and sets
Once upon a time, John Reiser said:
> Warning: This is intrusive because reading the status code via "$?" resets it
> to zero:
>$ false
>$ echo $?
>1
>$ echo $?
>0
That is incorrect. The second reading of $? is the exit code of running
"echo $?" (which succeeded). Just
FWIW Haiku uses bash and has a prompt which changes colour (green/red)
depending on whether the status code of the last command was good or
bad. I found this surprisingly useful. They use:
\[`if [ $? = 0 ]; then echo "\e[32m"; else echo "\e[31m"; fi`\]\w[\e[0m\]>
Warning: This is intrusive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
--- Comment #8 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #7)
> (In reply to Michal Josef Spacek from comment #4)
> > I think that you can remove BuildRequires for coreutils ...
>
> The %{_fixperms} macro is
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:59:17PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> shows a couple of additional packages that weren't covered in this thread so
> far:
>
> fastfetch
> gcc
> gdb
> grub2
> grubby
> javapackages-bootstrap
> ocaml-dose3
> sblim-cmpi-rpm
>
On 5/15/23 16:03, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
Hi,
I've created an MR [1] for the new cpio-2.14 release.
If your package is using cpio, or you use cpio could you please provide
any feedback on the new build (if it doesn't break your component)?
I CCied the RPM maintainers because that's a very
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
--- Comment #7 from
is someone active mainting this package ?
AFAIK, my RKL-S (Intel Core i5-11400) should be on 58
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2054688
https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files/releases/tag/microcode-20230512
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-constant` that
you are following:
``
Modernize spec; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-constant/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
Hello,
we have just disabled Fedora 36 chroots in Copr.
According to the Fedora wiki [1], Fedora 36 reached the end of its life
on 2023-05‑16 and therefore we are disabling it in Copr.
That effectively means that from this moment, it is no longer possible
to submit builds for the following
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said:
> FWIW Haiku uses bash and has a prompt which changes colour (green/red)
> depending on whether the status code of the last command was good or
> bad. I found this surprisingly useful. They use:
>
> \[`if [ $? = 0 ]; then echo "\e[32m"; else echo
FWIW Haiku uses bash and has a prompt which changes colour (green/red)
depending on whether the status code of the last command was good or
bad. I found this surprisingly useful. They use:
\[`if [ $? = 0 ]; then echo "\e[32m"; else echo "\e[31m"; fi`\]\w[\e[0m\]>
Rich.
--
Richard Jones,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208870
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PDL-2.84.0-1.fc39
Thank you to everyone who tested and gave karma.
This update has been pushed to regular epel9-next, and is available for all
CentOS Stream.
There is still one package that does not update and/or install. That is
qt-creator.
That is being worked on for both epel9 and epel9-next.
On Fri, May 19,
Hello maintainers!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v4.0 (the chroot
build environment manager for building RPMs). There are two rather big things
in this release, therefore the bump of the major version:
- There's a new support for the DNF5 package manager (which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208828
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-76e823780d has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-76e823780d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208828
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-1b6352567b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-1b6352567b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208828
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f0df302bb8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f0df302bb8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208828
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-4194a84c82 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4194a84c82
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208828
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-URandom-0.39-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
--- Comment #6 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Sorry I set review as done, but not done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 6:57 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > But could we use U-Boot to fill in this gap so these systems still
> > work? We'd then treat x86 like ARM (if no UEFI, use U-Boot UEFI).
>
> How does u-boot handle EFI variables in that case?
>
Unless the variable store is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service
---
Hello @voegelas,
since this is your first Fedora package, you need to get sponsored by a package
sponsor before it can be accepted.
A sponsor is an experienced package maintainer who will guide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230521.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230522.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 81
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 644.57 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi,
> But could we use U-Boot to fill in this gap so these systems still
> work? We'd then treat x86 like ARM (if no UEFI, use U-Boot UEFI).
How does u-boot handle EFI variables in that case?
How does u-boot do storage access in that case? Go call BIOS INT13h?
Or use its own device drivers?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208828
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
|ppi...@redhat.com
Hi Fedora Folks!
As I am going to do some RPM packaging in the future (for my employer
and probably also a bit in private) I wanted to introduce me briefly.
I'm Philipp, based in southern Germany and have been an open source
enthusiast at least since 2016/17. I am currently working a lot with
I would like to add this package to Fedora to enable LSP support for
OpenGL Shading Language.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2208531
My PR for upstream KDE text editor Kate has already been merged:
https://invent.kde.org/utilities/kate/-/merge_requests/1227
This
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 22 May
at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC (Libera.chat). The meeting
is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us
over:
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedoraproject.org
IRC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208970
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2168842
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208970
Bug ID: 2208970
Summary: perl-pmtools-2.2.0-17.fc39 FTBFS: t/pmcat.t test fails
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-pmtools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208967
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2168842
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208967
Bug ID: 2208967
Summary: perl-GnuPG-Interface-1.02-7.fc39 FTBFS: tests fail
with gnupg2-2.4.1
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
On 5/20/23 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 05. 23 19:34, Jilayne Lovejoy wrote:
On 5/19/23 4:03 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 05. 23 4:28, Jilayne Lovejoy wrote:
Packages from this list
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/eln-not-migrated.txt
that were worked on during
Hi Jens,
Jens-Ulrik Petersen writes:
> In Fedora the bash prompt is not colored or highlighted by default.
>
> I personally find this a usability issue: it makes it hard to find previous
> commands between long outputs when scrolling back in a terminal. Of course
> in my own host I have a
55 matches
Mail list logo
