The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
openbgpd-8.1-1.el7
xrootd-5.6.1-1.el7
Details about builds:
openbgpd-8.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b6e1053f4b)
OpenBGPD Routing Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219204
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215501
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217108
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219204
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217108
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215501
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
Hi,
Thanks for looking at this, and sorry about the delay I was on PTO for a
few days.
On 6/28/23 09:15, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:24:04PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
But, IMHO the largest change is moving the boot kernel/initrd to the
ESP, rather than the use of
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
centpkg-0.7.4-2.el8
java-runtime-decompiler-7.3-2.el8
openbgpd-8.1-1.el8
rizin-0.5.2-2.el8
wasmedge-0.13.1-1.el8
xrootd-5.6.1-1.el8
Details about builds:
On 7/6/23 12:10, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Important process note: we are experimenting with using Fedora
> Discussion as part of the Changes process. Change announcements (like
> the one you are reading right now) will still be sent to the
> devel-announce mailing list, but the conversation about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-File-Listing-6.16-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103286993
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1975499
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1975499=edit
Update to 6.16 (#474)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474
Bug ID: 474
Summary: perl-File-Listing-6.16 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-Listing
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 7/6/23 21:17, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 07:42:47 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>> Then make the metrics be neither opt-in nor opt-out. Have
>> “Enable telemetry (y/n)?” be a mandatory question in the
>> installer,
>> which the user must answer.
>
> The
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 15:18 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 01:57:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 21:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-129c8286a0
> > >
> > > This one seems a bit
SUSE has also jumped in to say they will provide an alternative, but compatible
Linux to RH.
Leslie Satenstein
On Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 06:49:38 a.m. GMT-4, Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
Oracle has (finally – the community projects Rocky and Alma were much
quicker to
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 01:57:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 21:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-129c8286a0
> >
> > This one seems a bit different. There seem to be no tests running.
> > The test gating status
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 3:34 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I looked through the section names with objdump -h and none of them
> looked unusual. However I think in the past when we analyzed this we
> found it was doing something really crazy, like actually appending the
> bytecode to the file
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 09:21:40PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 09:54:49AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 4:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > > During the OCaml 5 rebuild I found there's a generic problem on s390x
> > > & ppc64le
+1
Yes this has been mentioned many times on the thread. You can't say the user
has consented but also have it opt-out.
Saying that opt-in data isn't useful because most users won't opt-in is
implying the desire of a dark pattern to encourage more data collection.
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 21:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-129c8286a0
>
> This one seems a bit different. There seem to be no tests running.
> The test gating status is "ignored" (I didn't do that). And otherwise
> it seems to be doing
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:46 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-129c8286a0
>
> This one seems a bit different. There seem to be no tests running.
> The test gating status is "ignored" (I didn't do that). And otherwise
> it seems to be doing
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-129c8286a0
This one seems a bit different. There seem to be no tests running.
The test gating status is "ignored" (I didn't do that). And otherwise
it seems to be doing nothing.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
Agreed 100%. Dark patterning or similar isn't the way to go.
If telemetry is included, it should be opt-in with very clear explanation of
why opt-ing in is important and beneficial.
Opt-out and "by consent" are mutually exclusive in most circumstances.
Unfortunately this might just be what happens.
I know that I would personally always opt out on principle, and would vote for
opt-in or dropping the proposal. I am under the impression that most Fedora
users are in the same boat as me.
___
devel
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 06:00:02PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:48:46AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 9:37 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > > - ocaml-atd
> > >
> > >Fails to build because it requires Python3 flake8 which is
> > >
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 11:00 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > My test build of the swig package, which succeeded, was done with
> > > python 3.11. I suspect that this is python 3.12 breakage. The OCaml
> > > testsuite passed, so this
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 09:54:49AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 4:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > During the OCaml 5 rebuild I found there's a generic problem on s390x
> > & ppc64le (ie. the bytecode-only architectures) involving stripping of
> > OCaml binaries.
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 18:37 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:26 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8d5b08b005
> >
> > I don't understand what this update is waiting on / why it cannot go
> > to Fedora
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:37 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:26 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8d5b08b005
> >
> > I don't understand what this update is waiting on / why it cannot go
> > to Fedora immediately.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 11:00 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > - swig
> > >
> > >This also should work but does not. It has a very opaque failures
> > >in the test suite. I'm going to try to reproduce this one locally.
> >
> > This is the failure:
> >
> > checking python testcase
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:48:46AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 9:37 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > - ocaml-atd
> >
> >Fails to build because it requires Python3 flake8 which is
> >uninstallable at the moment.
>
> It is used for testing only, so we can disable
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-07-12/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-07-12-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-07-12/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-07-12-16.30.txt
Log:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 9:37 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> - ocaml-atd
>
>Fails to build because it requires Python3 flake8 which is
>uninstallable at the moment.
It is used for testing only, so we can disable the python tests for
now to get this to build.
> - ocaml-camlp5
>
>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:26 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8d5b08b005
>
> I don't understand what this update is waiting on / why it cannot go
> to Fedora immediately.
>
> I waived the tests.
>
> There are still apparently 5 tests
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8d5b08b005
I don't understand what this update is waiting on / why it cannot go
to Fedora immediately.
I waived the tests.
There are still apparently 5 tests "running", but clicking through to
the Automated Tests tab shows only 4. There's no
Matt has started a poll with regards to the community's preferences
about the topic:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/straw-poll-on-your-preferences-about-opt-in-opt-out-for-possible-data-collection/85675/2
On 7/12/23 12:37, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, 2023-07-11 08:17:07
Matt has started a poll with regards to the community's preferences
about the topic:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/straw-poll-on-your-preferences-about-opt-in-opt-out-for-possible-data-collection/85675/2
On 7/12/23 12:37, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, 2023-07-11 08:17:07 -0500,
Hey Folks,
We are currently running the Fedora Kernel Test Week before we rebase
6.4. There is a new
build 6.4.3 is fresh and you can now provide feedback!
Thanks a lot to all for making the test weeks so successful. The links
for test weeks can be found here[0]. Results can be submitted here[1]
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 4:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> During the OCaml 5 rebuild I found there's a generic problem on s390x
> & ppc64le (ie. the bytecode-only architectures) involving stripping of
> OCaml binaries. A good example is supermin on s390x:
>
> # uname -a
> Linux
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 10:05:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Jerry James & I are doing a rebuild of all OCaml packages.
This is mostly complete now, and I have submitted an update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8d5b08b005
I managed to build 175 packages out 186.
FYI, postponing this to tomorrow, qt6 packages are unbuildable in rawhide
(unrelated to this change).
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:33 AM Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
> Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2023/07/12 17:18:
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:36 AM Mamoru TASAKA >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I am not the
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 7:24 PM Jonathan Steffan
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Steffan
> wrote:
>>
>> 2. All userspace is in RAM
>
>
> For example, let's install `dnf install tuxpuck`. I'd expect `tuxpuck` to be
> installed and playable. I wouldn't have to reboot after
Hau idatzi du Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak
(2023 uzt. 12(a), az. (11:53)):
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:06 PM Mikel Olasagasti
> wrote:
> >
>
> (snip)
>
> >
> > > golang-github-moby-spdystreamgo-sig, mikelo2
> >
> > Builds fine in Koschei and no BZ
> >
> >
On 7/11/23 19:23, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Steffan
> mailto:jonathanstef...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> 2. All userspace is in RAM
>
>
> For example, let's install `dnf install tuxpuck`. I'd expect `tuxpuck`
> to be installed and playable. I wouldn't have
During the OCaml 5 rebuild I found there's a generic problem on s390x
& ppc64le (ie. the bytecode-only architectures) involving stripping of
OCaml binaries. A good example is supermin on s390x:
# uname -a
Linux e132ed8a0a9b4411b210e43e253581f0 6.4.0-59.fc39.s390x #1 SMP Mon Jun 26
11:55:15
Hi,
On Tuesday, 2023-07-11 08:17:07 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I think what happens is: somebody (anybody) can report a post, if it gets
> enough reports it gets proactively hidden before a moderator can review it.
> Do our moderators eventually review such posts to ensure they're truly
>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:06 PM Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
>
(snip)
>
> > golang-github-moby-spdystreamgo-sig, mikelo2
>
> Builds fine in Koschei and no BZ
>
> > golang-github-openapi-validate alexsaezm, go-sig
>
> Builds fine in Koschei and no BZ
This is usually an
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230711.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230712.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:7
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 13
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 119
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 3.89 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
gimp-help license was changed from GFDL and GPLv2+ to
GFDL-1.2-invariants-only as GPLv2+ is license used for scripts used during
build time only and those scripts are not part of final language/help
packages.
Best regards
Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat
Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2023/07/12 17:18:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:36 AM Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
I am not the maintainer of brltty, but just adding "BR: gcc" makes
brltty compile on all arches (against f39):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103255038
I am not sure to
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:36 AM Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
> I am not the maintainer of brltty, but just adding "BR: gcc" makes
> brltty compile on all arches (against f39):
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103255038
>
> I am not sure to what side-tag I should build brltty for
I'd submitted the side-tag for merging to f39 base:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-18495e9c7c
There are a bunch of packages missing, these will be handled after the side
merge. If I didn't miss anything, all of the failures were FTBFS already.
Since we have libicu72 in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182
Bug ID: 182
Summary: perl-Module-Reader-0.003003-18.fc39 FTBFS with Perl
5.38: t/memory.t fails on a different wording
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2023/07/12 7:35:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:06 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
Yes I think it's better if you could proceed with brltty.
Note I pushed a commit earlier today which excludes %{ix86} from the
OCaml subpackage. In OCaml 5 / Fedora 39 we are going to
55 matches
Mail list logo
