Re: PR #47: binutils: drop gold

2023-08-02 Thread Dennis Gilmore via devel
I think it is fair to say it is a system wide change Dennis On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 1:40 PM Amit Shah wrote: > > > On Wed, 2023-08-02 at 10:50 -0500, Dennis Gilmore via devel wrote: > > Given https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS_GOLD and > >

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2023-08-02 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-72bc7cd989 apptainer-1.2.2-1.el7 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e594723d53 seamonkey-2.53.17-1.el7 1

Orphaned qodem

2023-08-02 Thread Richard Shaw
I have orphaned qodem. I haven't used it in years and was only interested during a brief revival of the good ole' BBS days many years ago. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qodem Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Self Introduction: Felix Maurer

2023-08-02 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:27 PM Felix Maurer wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > My name is Felix and I'm a software engineer from Germany. As long as > I'm working on software, I've always enjoyed contributing to the open > source projects I use. I have some experience creating RPMs for personal >

Self Introduction: Felix Maurer

2023-08-02 Thread Felix Maurer
Hi everyone! My name is Felix and I'm a software engineer from Germany. As long as I'm working on software, I've always enjoyed contributing to the open source projects I use. I have some experience creating RPMs for personal software. For Fedora, I plan to first work on unretiring the stgit

poppler soname bump in Rawhide

2023-08-02 Thread Marek Kasik
Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 23.08.0, which was released today, in the side tag "f39-build-side-70931". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in it and I will merge it to the main buildroot at Monday (7th of August) just before the branching. There are several API

Re: Script for installing TeXLive packages required by a document?

2023-08-02 Thread Blaise Pabon
Peace and blessings upon you, this is great. Years ago, managing Tex dependencies was the bane of my life. On Tue, Aug 1, 2023, 8:19 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > Would any Fedora TeXLive users have any scripts to figure out what > TeXLive packages a TeX/LaTeX document uses and install

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-08-02

2023-08-02 Thread Dusty Mabe
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-08-02/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-08-02-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-08-02/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-08-02-16.30.txt Log:

Re: Script for installing TeXLive packages required by a document?

2023-08-02 Thread Iñaki Ucar
This is very useful, so +1 to packaging it. I don't know if there's a better solution. There is an R package called tinytex [1] that provides automatic installation of TeXLive packages in a user library. AFAIK, it just compiles the stuff, parses the logs for errors looking for "blablabla.sty not

Re: PR #47: binutils: drop gold

2023-08-02 Thread Amit Shah
On Wed, 2023-08-02 at 10:50 -0500, Dennis Gilmore via devel wrote: > Given https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS_GOLD and > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoldLinkerDefault it seems > reasonable that to remove the feature we have a change to ensure wide > notice and

Re: PR #47: binutils: drop gold

2023-08-02 Thread Dennis Gilmore via devel
Given https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS_GOLD and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoldLinkerDefault it seems reasonable that to remove the feature we have a change to ensure wide notice and documentation of the change Dennis On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:08 AM Amit Shah wrote:

Re: PR #47: binutils: drop gold

2023-08-02 Thread Amit Shah
CC'ing Siddhesh to get more eyes. On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:07 +0200, Amit Shah wrote: > (I realized I hadn't subscribed to f-devel with this email ID, and this > message didn't make it to devel. Resending.) > > On Thu, 2023-06-15 at 13:59 +0200, Amit Shah wrote: > > Hey Nick, > > > > I 

[Bug 2226085] perl-Glib: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f39: Failed test at t/g.t

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226085 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|NEW

Re: RFC authselect: mdns or mdns-minimal

2023-08-02 Thread Petr Menšík
I have created upstream pull request, which makes non-minimal plugins to behave like minimal plugins except it tries to find /etc/mdns.allow. If that file does not exist, it copies also reverse queries from minimal plugin. Here: https://github.com/lathiat/nss-mdns/pull/89 On 02. 08. 23 9:15,

Re: NTFS corruption with Fedora 37 and 38

2023-08-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 07:51:29PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 18:50:30 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Did you get to the bottom of what's really happening here? > > As in the message that opened this topic, it is suspected that there > has been a change to mount

[Bug 2227759] perl-System-Info-0.064 is available

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227759 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED

dlmalloc CC0 license (was Re: Packaging a cross-compilation environment (wasi-libc))

2023-08-02 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
Bringing a year old thread back from the dead... On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 06:54:35AM -0700, Jan Staněk wrote: > Florian Weimer writes: > > You can try to replace the current version with dlmalloc 2.7.2, which > > still comes with the previous public domain dedication: > > > >

Re: Direwolf FTBFS: Need C help

2023-08-02 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 06:47:58AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > I was poking around trying to fix the FTBFS problem with direwolf and it > looks simple enough. As it has built before for years I assume it's related > to GCC 13. > > Here's the error: >

Direwolf FTBFS: Need C help

2023-08-02 Thread Richard Shaw
I was poking around trying to fix the FTBFS problem with direwolf and it looks simple enough. As it has built before for years I assume it's related to GCC 13. Here's the error: /builddir/build/BUILD/direwolf-1.6/src/direwolf.h:303:56: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string

[Bug 2228395] CVE-2023-31486 perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228395 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.084-1.fc39

[Bug 2228396] CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.32/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228396 --- Comment #1 from TEJ RATHI --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated

[Bug 2228398] CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.36/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228398 --- Comment #1 from TEJ RATHI --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated

[Bug 2228397] New: CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.34/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228397 Bug ID: 2228397 Summary: CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.34/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 38 Status: NEW

[Bug 2228396] CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.32/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228396 TEJ RATHI changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2228392 (CVE-2023-31486) Referenced

[Bug 2228395] CVE-2023-31486 perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228395 TEJ RATHI changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2228392 (CVE-2023-31486) Referenced

[Bug 2228398] New: CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.36/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228398 Bug ID: 2228398 Summary: CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.36/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 38 Status: NEW

[Bug 2228396] New: CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.32/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228396 Bug ID: 2228396 Summary: CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.32/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 38 Status: NEW

[Bug 2228397] CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.34/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228397 --- Comment #1 from TEJ RATHI --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated

[Bug 2228398] CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.36/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228398 TEJ RATHI changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2228392 (CVE-2023-31486) Referenced

[Bug 2228397] CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.34/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228397 TEJ RATHI changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2228392 (CVE-2023-31486) Referenced

[Bug 2228395] CVE-2023-31486 perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228395 --- Comment #1 from TEJ RATHI --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated

[Bug 2228395] New: CVE-2023-31486 perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228395 Bug ID: 2228395 Summary: CVE-2023-31486 perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny: insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 38 Status: NEW Component:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230802.n.0 changes

2023-08-02 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230801.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230802.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:26 Upgraded packages: 110 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 20.12 MiB Size of dropped packages

[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230802.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2023-08-02 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230802.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

[Bug 2228062] Upgrade perl-Calendar-Simple to 2.0.3

2023-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228062 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

2023-08-02 Thread Troy Dawson
The EPEL Steering Committee meeting has been canceled this week. If you need your EPEL fix, you can watch the "State of EPEL" presentation at Flock https://flock2023.sched.com/event/1Or5D/state-of-epel or any of the other great presentations at Flock. On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 9:00 AM wrote: >

Re: RFC authselect: mdns or mdns-minimal

2023-08-02 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
On 8/1/23 12:41, Petr Menšík wrote: Hi Zdenek, the current logic is: - with-mdns4: mdns4_minimal - with-mdns6: mdns6_minimal - with-mdns4 and with-mdns6? mdns_minimal If I understand your message correctly, you propose to keep this logic but use mdns4/mdns6/mdns instead of minimal and drop

Re: RFC authselect: mdns or mdns-minimal

2023-08-02 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
On 8/1/23 12:16, Petr Menšík wrote: Hi Pavel, With Avahi upstream maintainer hat on, I would say it still makes sense to have separate mdns*_minimal and mdns? modules. I would say mdns (non-minimal) should be rarely needed, because by default it should be used just for *.local names. I

Re: Tracker bug for approved change proposals

2023-08-02 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 01/08/23 19:03, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 7:00 PM Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho > wrote: >> I noticed that a few change proposals that have been approved still did >> not get a bug tracker, e.g.: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-17 >> >> As things have