Thank you for the question. The next release will remove obsolete of dnf,
provide of dnf, conflict with dnf and symlink /usr/bin/dnf from DNF5 package in
rawhide. It means that if you have dnf5 installed on your system, dnf5 will
stay on your system. If you wish to install dnf package then you
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6237ba7467
apptainer-1.2.2-1.el9
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-35315f9dc7
chromium-115.0.5790.110-1.el9
The following builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224929
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224929
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Tree-1.16-1.fc39 |perl-Tree-1.16-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228222
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Mozilla-CA-20230801-1.
Just a question, do we have any mechanism to migrate users from
sshd.socket to sshd.service? Otherwise someone may suddenly lose access
to their headless systems after an upgrade.
在 2023/8/3 10:29, Dmitry Belyavskiy 写道:
Dear colleagues,
I've pushed a fresh build of OpenSSH to rawhide.
We
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 149286
--
You are receiving
I will take it.
чт, 3 авг. 2023 г., 19:24 Zdeněk Žamberský :
> Hello,
>
> review request (jedit):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228918
>
> reviewers welcome :)
> thanks
>
> --
> Zdeněk Žamberský
> OpenJDK QE
> Red Hat
> ___
> devel
Hello,
review request (jedit):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228918
reviewers welcome :)
thanks
--
Zdeněk Žamberský
OpenJDK QE
Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Prior to release 0.1.8, python-h5io used a bundled, amalgamated
versioneer.py under CC0-1.0 to generate a _version.py file under the
same license, so the package was licensed (BSD-3-Clause AND CC0-1.0).
With release 0.1.8, upstream no longer uses Versioneer, so the package
license is now
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 4:11 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> > I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or
> > build either. I wonder if it has something to do with this error I
> > just encountered while preparing an update for the package:
> >
> > $ git push
> >
> I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or
> build either. I wonder if it has something to do with this error I
> just encountered while preparing an update for the package:
>
> $ git push
> Source file '60-%{fontpkgname1}.conf' was neither listed in the
> 'sources'
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 1:15 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> Is it up to the packagers to rebuild these? I have a package on this
> list, but there is no commit in dist-git concerning the F39 Mass
> Rebuild.
I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or
build either. I
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Mozilla-CA` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
20230801 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mozilla-CA/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Mozilla-CA` that
you are following:
``
20230801 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mozilla-CA/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 7:14 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 06:47:58AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I was poking around trying to fix the FTBFS problem with direwolf and it
> > looks simple enough. As it has built before for years I assume it's
> related
> > to GCC 13.
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225452
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228222
--- Comment #4 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
I will update rawhide only (not needed in case of Fedora 38)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228222
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228222
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225452
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4-3.007-1
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230802.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230803.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:189
Upgraded packages: 117
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 13.35 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Review is up:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228841
Should be quite an easy one, if anyone wants to swap :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Tiny` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update run-requires for changing the default parameter from 0 to 1
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny/pull-request/2
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Tiny` that
you are following:
``
Update run-requires for changing the default parameter from 0 to 1
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny/pull-request/2
Hi all.
In some days (7 days al least), i will upgrade PETSc libraries to the
release 3.19.4 in Rawhide (waiting for PETSc-3.20).
All related dependencies will be rebuilt in a f39-side-tag build tree.
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 15:10:34 -0400, Blaise Pabon wrote:
> Peace and blessings upon you, this is great.
> Years ago, managing Tex dependencies was the bane of my life.
Haha, yeh, but all the work spot and others do to package TeXLive for us
makes it so much easier now :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 20:52:24 +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> This is very useful, so +1 to packaging it.
>
> I don't know if there's a better solution. There is an R package called
> tinytex
> [1] that provides automatic installation of TeXLive packages in a user
> library.
> AFAIK, it just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225452
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com
Status|NEW
Dear colleagues,
I've pushed a fresh build of OpenSSH to rawhide.
We decided to drop the sshd.socket unit from rawhide. We don't think
it's worth going through the changes process, but would like to
provide a heads-up.
See the details in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025716.
--
29 matches
Mail list logo
