Hello team,
Due to a busy schedule, I am currently unable to investigate the issue
related to python-openshadinglanguage on both Rawhide and Fedora 39 due
to fmt10 compatibilty.
Could someone take a look at the issue and resolve it please?
Thank you.
Reference:
-
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-37fa993c81
clamav-0.103.9-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-db0eac64fb
chromium-116.0.5845.96-1.el8
2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231653
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-ed86ea7a17 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233885
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-984ad90082 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231653
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-cd56289774 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233072
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-02769b2cb4 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e2fcc4af81
llhttp-8.1.1-1.el9 python-aiohttp-3.8.5-1.el9
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f08c8f0812
chromium-116.0.5845.96-1.el9
you are absolutly right
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
On 23-08-2023 14:55, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 23. 08. 23 v 12:44 Sandro napsal(a):
On 20-08-2023 12:19, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
If you are workshop participant and have PR opened for longer than 14
days then let me know and I will merge it.
Here's the one I made during Flock workshop:
Hello,
Does anyone know how to contact juergh (Juerg Haefliger)? They are the
sole maintainer of a single package in Fedora (cloud-utils), which
hasn't seen any activity for almost 4 years.
I've filed a non-responsive check bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234606
Here are
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:39:07PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a heads-up: for the upgrade to DNF5 in F39, we unprotected the DNF
> package, which leaves all of our users vulnerable to a removal of DNF.
>
>
> We have one affected user here:
>
On 8/24/23 15:48, Adam Piasecki wrote:
Hello everyone,
I hope this message finds you all well!
My name is Adam Piasecki, and I've recently joined this mailing list to further
immerse myself in such a vibrant open-source community ;)
I joined Red Hat in 2022 as an intern, and ever since one
On 8/23/23 20:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-08-24/fesco.2023-08-24-17.04.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-08-24/fesco.2023-08-24-17.04.txt
Log:
Hello,
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 2:27:40 PM EDT Steven Presti wrote:
> * New Package Request: audit (spresti, 17:04:16)
> * LINK: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1362
> (spresti, 17:04:29)
> * LINK:
>
> just a note rpmfusion free and nofree not ready
>
>
What is the issue?
I branched rpmfusion repo two weeks ago
$ sudo repoclosure --check rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfree
Last metadata expiration check: 1:27:59 ago on Thu 24 Aug 2023 17:14:49 BST.
package:
Hello,
Just a heads-up: for the upgrade to DNF5 in F39, we unprotected the DNF package, which
leaves all of our users vulnerable to a removal of DNF.
And since the delaying of DNF5, we haven't re-protected it.
== Summary ==
New or revised (sub)package names are proposed for Kubernetes packages
in Fedora. The new names will better align Kubernetes with current
usage as documented upstream and improve alignment of package content
with current Fedora practices and standards.
See
== Summary ==
The python-sqlalchemy package is upgraded to major version 2. A
compatibility package python-sqlalchemy1.4 is added to the
distribution to cater for software which doesn’t yet use the new API,
this can be installed side-by-side. Other packages using SQLAlchemy
are identified and, if
== Summary ==
New or revised (sub)package names are proposed for Kubernetes packages
in Fedora. The new names will better align Kubernetes with current
usage as documented upstream and improve alignment of package content
with current Fedora practices and standards.
See
== Summary ==
The python-sqlalchemy package is upgraded to major version 2. A
compatibility package python-sqlalchemy1.4 is added to the
distribution to cater for software which doesn’t yet use the new API,
this can be installed side-by-side. Other packages using SQLAlchemy
are identified and, if
> just a note rpmfusion free and nofree not ready
>
>
What do you mean?
I branched rpmfusion two week ago, the repo deps look fine to me.
$ sudo repoclosure --check rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfreetanita999fly
Last metadata expiration check: 1:07:49 ago on Thu 24 Aug 2023 17:14:49
BTW, after removing python3-slip, python3-slip-dbus and python3-decorator,
both dnf5 and dnf produce no errors
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 6:35 AM Tom London wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 3:39 AM Nicola Sella wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mirek,
>>
>> dnf --releasever=39
No meeting this week.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 8:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2023-08-25 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-08-24 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
As far as I can tell it's mostly legacy removal and adoption of (now)
standardized types, such as "z_size_t" being replaced by "size_t"
There is a document here that tries to describe the different considerations:
https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/blob/develop/PORTING.md
"The zlib-ng native
Hello everyone,
I hope this message finds you all well!
My name is Adam Piasecki, and I've recently joined this mailing list to further
immerse myself in such a vibrant open-source community ;)
I joined Red Hat in 2022 as an intern, and ever since one thing has been
constant: my sincere belief
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 3:39 AM Nicola Sella wrote:
> Thanks Mirek,
>
> dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
>> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
>> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
>> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
>> --assumeno distro-sync
>>
>
On 8/23/23 04:12 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 1:41 PM Steven A. Falco mailto:stevenfa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 8/23/23 02:22 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm
OLD: Fedora-39-20230823.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20230824.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
I am performing an incompatible upgrade of the caddy package in EPEL
9. In accordance with the incompatible upgrade policy [0], I proposed
this upgrade just over a week ago on the epel-devel mailing list [1].
For reasons detailed in the previous email, it is no longer possible
to update the
I am retiring the caddy package from EPEL 7. In accordance with the
retirement policy [0], I proposed this retirement just over a week ago
on the epel-devel mailing list [1]. For reasons detailed in the
previous email, it is no longer possible to update the package with
the same major version,
This email announces that the llhttp package in EPEL9 will be upgraded
from 6.0.10 to 8.1.1[1], which breaks the ABI and bumps the SONAME
version, as discussed[2] and approved[3] under the EPEL Incompatible
Upgrades Policy[4]. At the same time, python-aiohttp will be upgraded
from 3.8.4 to
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2023-08-25 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10531/
___
devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234337
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 39 Branched 20230824.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
@Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho there is one
question I have due to the zlib-ng...
What is the difference between zlib-ng compiled with and without the
`ZLIB_COMPAT=ON` option? Are there any differences in the performance, or
is it only the names of the functions?
I'm interested in this
Thanks Mirek,
dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
>
Allow me to steal some testing. :)
I would like to point out that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231653
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-ed86ea7a17 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ed86ea7a17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hello,
I got quite a few issues, some of these are from third party repos, but
others do seem to be Fedora packages that are still FTBFS/FTI (a
majority are neuro-sig packages that we're aware of and working on):
Problem 1: package python3-cypy-0.2.0-12.fc38.noarch from @System requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231653
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231653
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On 8/23/23 18:34, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 08. 23 13:17, Sandro wrote:> This might be out of scope, but
would it also be possible to have it fail or
issue a warning if %pyproject_save_files -l marks a license, but the
packager also uses an explicit %license in %files. That would prevent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233885
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231653
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233885
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-984ad90082 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-984ad90082
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409444
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233072
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233885
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233765
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233072
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-02769b2cb4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-02769b2cb4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233072
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233885
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 01:04:36AM +0200, Łukasz Patron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Łukasz, a software engineer from Poland.
> In free time, I'm contributing to various OSS projects, mainly LineageOS.
>
> For Fedora, I plan to co-maintain WeeChat package and help with other
> packages that
54 matches
Mail list logo
